- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Global warming huh?
Posted on 2/15/21 at 1:02 pm to LSU2a
Posted on 2/15/21 at 1:02 pm to LSU2a
quote:Why the arbitrary 30 years when the planet is millions of not billions of years old?
Climate is the average weather over thirty years
If
quote:then 30 years is < .00027% of billions of years.
Three days of weather = ~.00027 % of a climate period.
1
Posted on 2/15/21 at 1:13 pm to Sidicous
quote:
quote:
Climate is the average weather over thirty years
Why the arbitrary 30 years when the planet is millions of not billions of years old?
If
quote:
Three days of weather = ~.00027 % of a climate period.
then 30 years is < .00027% of billions of years.
Ask climatologist. I would imagine that it has something to do with statistical sample size and the major oscillation patterns. Obviously if you determine climate with too large of a sample size, say uh millions of years, it would be pointless as we know that the climate has change drastically over those time periods.
Posted on 2/15/21 at 1:19 pm to Tigers1984
regional temps have nothing to do with global temps idiot
Posted on 2/15/21 at 1:59 pm to LSU2a
quote:
Climate is the average weather over thirty years. Three days of weather = ~.00027 % of a climate period.
That’s retarded. What you should be looking at are trends. 30 years ago is irrelevant.
Posted on 2/15/21 at 2:02 pm to MJforPrez
quote:
That’s retarded. What you should be looking at are trends. 30 years ago is irrelevant.
How would you account for natural variability if you don't establish a minimum sample size?
Posted on 2/15/21 at 2:07 pm to LSU2a
Man can control the weather.
Gender is a choice.
A diaper on your face protects from a virus.
2 masks are better than 1.
Science!
Gender is a choice.
A diaper on your face protects from a virus.
2 masks are better than 1.
Science!
Posted on 2/15/21 at 2:11 pm to LSU2a
quote:This is the reason. Statistics can say whatever a statistician wants given enough leeway with data manipulation.
I would imagine that it has something to do with statistical sample size
When the planet was warmer dinosaurs thrived, plant life was huge, Carbon levels of the atmosphere were much higher. Carbon levels of the Oceans was higher also (sea and air interact after all) making them more acidic and sea life was also abundant and huge.
It's all relative. I definitely do not advocate for returning to prehistoric levels of carbon. People already are huge enough and obviously have pea sized brains to support DemProgFilth.
Posted on 2/15/21 at 2:16 pm to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
regional temps have nothing to do with global temps idiot
How do you determine a “global temp”?
Posted on 2/15/21 at 3:04 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
or that we have even the slightest hope of controlling it..
or the slightest hope of even knowing what to set the temperature at if we could.
It is the ultimate scam pulled humanity-wide
There's a lot of truth here. It's funny too how the US and a scant few other countries are the ones who really pay the price for the accords they pass for this bullshite!
Posted on 2/15/21 at 3:07 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
How do you determine a “global temp”?
You don't but that fricks up their narrative and ability to lead you by the nose. What I can't get over are these chicken little poons who are all uptight about this garbage. Hey poons, look at your Dear Leader Obama who decided it was perfectly fine to by a house on the coast. You really thing he buys into the Climate Change hoax? That is what you all are calling it these days correct? I have to ask because that changes to fit the weather.
Posted on 2/15/21 at 3:07 pm to LSU2a
So when the left is going hysterical over a heat wave, a tornado outbreak or an active hurricane season . . .
Posted on 2/15/21 at 3:09 pm to 1MileTiger
quote:
The more people keep making this declaration every time it's cold, the more we look like idiots.
I don’t think you see how stupid you look when you worry about what others think of you as much as you do.
Posted on 2/15/21 at 3:23 pm to Eeyore
quote:
Man can control the weather.
Gender is a choice.
A diaper on your face protects from a virus.
2 masks are better than 1.
Science!
I don't think anyone is saying man controls the weather. They are saying that we can influence the climate by doing things like altering the atmosphere and modifying ecosystems. Just look at what dumping chlorofluorocarbons did to the ozone layer.
Posted on 2/15/21 at 3:28 pm to Sidicous
quote:
This is the reason. Statistics can say whatever a statistician wants given enough leeway with data manipulation.
Ah so because some people twist or cherry pick statistics then we shouldn't use statistics at all. You probably don't see the need for statistics in the sophisticated portions of our economy but I'll just let you know that statistics is critical to today's society.
Also, you might want to know that the use of 30 years to determine climate was determined long before human caused climate change was even a concept.
quote:
When the planet was warmer dinosaurs thrived, plant life was huge, Carbon levels of the atmosphere were much higher. Carbon levels of the Oceans was higher also (sea and air interact after all) making them more acidic and sea life was also abundant and huge.
It's all relative. I definitely do not advocate for returning to prehistoric levels of carbon. People already are huge enough and obviously have pea sized brains to support DemProgFilth.
Climatologist aren't saying that changing the climate is the issue, its the rate of change. If you artificially alter the atmosphere in such a way as to alter the climate faster than ecosystems can adapt then you disrupt and destroy those ecosystems.
Posted on 2/15/21 at 3:32 pm to Tigers1984
Hundreds gather to protest global warming!
Posted on 2/15/21 at 3:34 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
Turbines are frozen. Windmills are not working and leaking. They are buying natural gas out the wazoo, driving prices to twice historical records.
Government
Raping
Everyone
Everyday
Needlessly
Green energy for a better tomorrow.
Posted on 2/15/21 at 3:36 pm to Tigers1984
Go ahead and make fun of this crisis but U.N. Predicts Disaster if Global Warming Not Checked.
Time is running out!!! Or it already ran out...or something.
Time is running out!!! Or it already ran out...or something.
Posted on 2/15/21 at 3:43 pm to LSU2a
quote:
Climate is the average weather over thirty years. Three days of weather = ~.00027 % of a climate period.
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
LSU2a just proved it.
Posted on 2/15/21 at 3:44 pm to LSU2a
quote:
Climatologist aren't saying that changing the climate is the issue, its the rate of change.
Didn’t NOAA admit that they changed the data and that the changes made it seem as though the climate was warming at an incredibly fast rate (hence the term “global warming”).
If you artificially alter the atmosphere in such a way as to alter the climate faster than ecosystems can adapt then you disrupt and destroy those ecosystems.
So why did China and India (easily the world’s two largest polluters) get (ironically...or maybe not) a 30 year pass at the Paris climate accords?
.
Posted on 2/15/21 at 3:47 pm to Tigers1984
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News