Started By
Message
locked post

Skalski hit in our game last year was targeting, last night's call is total crap!

Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:46 pm
Posted by Smell the crawfish
In enemy territory
Member since Nov 2018
1542 posts
Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:46 pm
If a player can't knock the crap out of a player in the rib area and not get called for targeting, why don't we just play two hand touch. Skalski did lead with his helmet, but he's the one risking injury. I understand hitting in the head and neck area is dangerous for the defenseless player, but he nailed Fields in the rib area, just like it's been done for decades. Stalski didn't deserve to get kicked out after simply making a hard hit.
This post was edited on 1/2/21 at 12:48 pm
Posted by okietiger
Chelsea F.C. Fan
Member since Oct 2005
42275 posts
Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:47 pm to
He tackles like someone with no brain cells left but agreed it was a weak call.
This post was edited on 1/2/21 at 12:49 pm
Posted by ProjectP2294
South St. Louis city
Member since May 2007
76210 posts
Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:48 pm to
I’m not reading your whole post because the title is enough for me to know you are an idiot
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
18452 posts
Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:48 pm to
Leading with the crown is targeting. It's not a grey area. Skalski is a punk who does it way too often. If he broke his neck pulling that shite, he and his family would sue the school and NCAA.
Posted by bayouboo
Member since Jan 2007
3650 posts
Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:48 pm to
The rule is in place so he doesn’t break his own neck.
Posted by Bayoubengal205
Member since Nov 2016
1195 posts
Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:49 pm to
He broke a very strict rule. And has a history of it throughout his entire college career. Got what he deserved.
And the rule is in place to protect the defender just as much as the guy getting hit.
Posted by MakeMoney
Guck Foodell
Member since Aug 2008
4322 posts
Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:50 pm to
YOU CAN NOT LEAD WITH THE CROWN OF THE HELMET
Posted by Chipand2Putts
trembling hills
Member since Apr 2012
1767 posts
Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:50 pm to
The rule is in place to protect those making the hits as much as those getting hit. That type of hit is exactly what the rules committee is trying to prevent. It was a textbook example of how not to tackle someone. He didn’t get a penalty for drilling a guy in the ribs. He got ejected for leading with the crown of his helmet.
Posted by Bosethus68
We Call It Dat Boot
Member since May 2011
5388 posts
Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

Leading with the crown is targeting


Why doesn’t it get called on RBs, WRs, OLine, DLine, FBs on EVERY play. There needs to be an intent factor
Posted by geauxtigers33
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2014
13735 posts
Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:51 pm to
He launched leading with the crown of his helmet that is targeting. The rule is the dumbest rule in sports, but the interpretation of it last night was correct.

The fact that it leads to removal of players from a game is absolutely ridiculous.
Posted by tjtiger9
MS
Member since Aug 2005
4012 posts
Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:51 pm to
I’m going say it loud for the people in the back...IT WAS TARGETING!! He led with the crown of the helmet. It doesn’t have to be to the head or neck.
The dude has a history of doing this. They are not only trying to protect the offensive player, but the tackling player so he doesn’t break his neck.
Posted by michael corleone
baton rouge
Member since Jun 2005
6506 posts
Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:53 pm to
Posted it after our game last year —-he has a reputation. The refs watch him as a result of the reputation. He has been ejected at least 4 times in the last two years. He and the Clemson coaches know all of this, despite so he continues to launch and lead with the crown of the helmet.
Posted by oOoLsUtIgErSoOo
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2006
26411 posts
Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

I’m not reading your whole post because the title is enough for me to know you are an idiot


The other 500 stupid threads he usually starts on here should have given that away a long time ago.
Posted by MJforPrez
Member since Dec 2020
445 posts
Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

If he broke his neck pulling that shite, he and his family would sue the school and NCAA.


I hate Skalski, he is 100% a dirty player (“hard hitter” my arse) and I jumped for joy when he got ejected, but, I am relieved for the kid that he didn’t wake up paralyzed today.

He took his dad’s advice on “always making them feel the hit” a little too keenly. Just imagine what his Dad would be thinking beyond the grave right now, if his son broke his own neck trying to heed that advice.
Posted by Bayoubengal205
Member since Nov 2016
1195 posts
Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

Targeting and Making Forcible Contact With the Crown of the Helmet ARTICLE 3. No player shall target and make forcible contact against an opponent with the crown of his helmet. This foul requires that there be at least one indicator of targeting (See Note 1 below). When in question, it is a foul. (Rule 9-6) (A.R. 9-1-3-I)

LINK
Posted by Smell the crawfish
In enemy territory
Member since Nov 2018
1542 posts
Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:56 pm to
Running backs lead with their head all the time and they also strike defenders in the face mask all the time when they stiff arm a defender, but nothing is called. However, if a OL/DL hits in the mask area, it's a penalty!
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
17380 posts
Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Skalski did lead with his helmet, but he's the one risking injury. 

Not supposed to use your helmet as a weapon. Football organizations from top to bottom are basically saying learn to tackle or gtfo.
Posted by oOoLsUtIgErSoOo
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2006
26411 posts
Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

They are not only trying to protect the offensive player, but the tackling player so he doesn’t break his neck


Yeah, but according to the glue sniffing OP, if he is launching with only a risk of injury to his own self it should be ok.
Posted by Smell the crawfish
In enemy territory
Member since Nov 2018
1542 posts
Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:59 pm to
No, it's not! It's put there to protect a defenseless player! The defender is not a defenseless player, so don't tell me it's put in there to protect the defender! This is the protect the offensive player, period!
Posted by PillPusher
Gulf Coast
Member since Oct 2009
5928 posts
Posted on 1/2/21 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

but he's the one risking injury.


Is he though? Because he seemed to injure Fields pretty good on the play. Could have broken his ribs.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram