- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump lost Pennsylvania Monday
Posted on 10/20/20 at 12:26 am to SCLibertarian
Posted on 10/20/20 at 12:26 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
Trump ain't no angel.
Let's see what happens. I'll bet you that the VAST, VAST, VAST majority of ballots that come in between Nov. 4 and Nov. 6 will come from HEAVY Dim precincts and will run HEAVILY in favor of Biden.
Posted on 10/20/20 at 12:27 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
Trump ain't Romney and he ain't McCain. If the Dems are doing this, so will he.
This. I think they just burned a GOP ballot box in Cali today they are so mad
Posted on 10/20/20 at 12:27 am to jmcwhrter
Nah here’s what will happen...
If the election comes down to Pa... rnc will sue, and it’ll go to the Supreme Court again, but this time ACB will be there and it’ll be rules only ballots in by 11/3 will count
If the election comes down to Pa... rnc will sue, and it’ll go to the Supreme Court again, but this time ACB will be there and it’ll be rules only ballots in by 11/3 will count
Posted on 10/20/20 at 12:36 am to MMauler
quote:
Because we're not COMPLETE F*CKING SCUMBAGS.
This is the Dims M.O. They invented ballot harvesting. They used to drive people in buses and have them vote at several precincts, but ballot harvesting is easier and makes it much harder to get caught.
I’m more conservative than 95% of this board, but this is a retarded argument. Republicans cheat (see North Carolina 9th district). Difference is Republicans sick at it and Dems are pros.
Maybe we get out shite together.
Posted on 10/20/20 at 12:43 am to MMauler
I, too, was initially scared at the possibility, but to pull off massive fraud like that is much harder than it sounds.
First, the list of names have to be verified as having not voted this year (and not dead) which won't be known until after polls close. Time consuming.
2nd, the ballot has to be filled out and signed with that person's name. Time consuming.
3rd, the post-mark has to be skillfully/credibly imperfect. Time-consuming.
4th, there will be poll watchers to verify & convince of fraud-less activity. Otherwise, the cabal of ballot-makers & ballot-counters could just make up numbers.
5th, a truckload of 20,000 imperfect post-marked ballots suddenly all arriving over 3 days would be highly scrutinized & contested.
Is it possible? yes. Improbable? most likely.
First, the list of names have to be verified as having not voted this year (and not dead) which won't be known until after polls close. Time consuming.
2nd, the ballot has to be filled out and signed with that person's name. Time consuming.
3rd, the post-mark has to be skillfully/credibly imperfect. Time-consuming.
4th, there will be poll watchers to verify & convince of fraud-less activity. Otherwise, the cabal of ballot-makers & ballot-counters could just make up numbers.
5th, a truckload of 20,000 imperfect post-marked ballots suddenly all arriving over 3 days would be highly scrutinized & contested.
Is it possible? yes. Improbable? most likely.
Posted on 10/20/20 at 12:44 am to David_DJS
quote:
Republicans cheat (see North Carolina 9th district)
That was someone who cheated in HIS OWN race.
We're talking a national election where it's the sycophants who have to take all of the risks.
HERE, it's pretty universal that it's the Dims that get caught IF ANYONE EVER LOOKS OR INVESTIGATES.
Posted on 10/20/20 at 12:50 am to LSUFreek
quote:
4th, there will be poll watchers to verify
Verify WHAT?
The Dims just need a list of those who didn't vote. The fraudulent ballots will come from that lists. There's no way to show or verify that the people on the voter rolls who didn't vote at the precinct on November 3rd didn't send in their ballots on November 3rd, 4th, 5th or 6th.
quote:
5th, a truckload of 20,000 imperfect post-marked ballots suddenly all arriving over 3 days would be highly scrutinized & contested.
This will be coordinated and will happen all over the state at heavy Dim precincts.
WHY DO YOU THINK THAT THE DIMS TOOK THIS ALL THE WAY TO THE SUPREME COURT?
Do you really think that they just want to make sure that "every ballot is counted" -- whether it be Republican or Democrat?
Do you really believe that Dims are against Voter I.D. because they believe it's racist? If so, you must believe like the Dims that blacks are too stupid, lazy and ignorant to figure out the simple task of getting a state issued I.D. card -- something that they need to get through life with.
Massive f*cking Voter Fraud is what the Dims do. Anyone over the age of 18 should already realize this.
This post was edited on 10/20/20 at 12:53 am
Posted on 10/20/20 at 3:25 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
Trump ain't no angel. If you don't think he's got Roger Stone and some other nefarious folks in places like PA, I think you're underestimating him.
He’s been one step ahead of the dems for years. I’m not ready do stop giving him the benefit of the doubt just yet.
Posted on 10/20/20 at 4:58 am to LSUFreek
quote:
Nah, relax. It's been stated they have to be post-dated by Nov 3rd.
quote:You are badly underestimating what is afoot.
I, too, was initially scared at the possibility, but to pull off massive fraud like that is much harder than it sounds.
Think about it. Who would even consider submitting a proposal that NON-POSTMARKED ballots turning up days after the election be counted?
The answer ... someone who knows how to take advantage of such a system. All one needs to do is payoff a couple of postal workers running the route between a major post office and the mail-in vote repository.
It wouldn't even put the mailman in much jeopardy. Parties would identify an address for package delivery along the route. Mailman leaves truck to deliver the package. Democrat thug slips a 3ft stack of ballots in the truck while the mailman is doing the delivery.
Insofar as postmark requirements, creating an imitation postmark is incredibly simple ( LINK). The extraordinarily lax standards of "illegible or nonexistent postmarks" means mail with a simple computer generated counterfeit pm would easily pass muster.
Posted on 10/20/20 at 5:30 am to BFIV
Yep, Roberts just gave them precedent. Those downplaying this don't understand the infrastructure of cheating the left has been putting into place for years. This is what the curiously lopsided polls are for. This is what all of the "Will Trump leave office peacefully" rhetoric in the media is about. They know this will be a race where cheating will be obvious. They don't care. Trump will try and contest and they'll start screaming about how he never planned to leave office and how the polls were proved correct and all that jibber-jabber.
We're playing by Chinese rules in this country. They intend that Trump lose this election, no matter what.
We're playing by Chinese rules in this country. They intend that Trump lose this election, no matter what.
Posted on 10/20/20 at 6:00 am to BFIV
Republicans need to play the same game and show up with sacks of ballots.
Posted on 10/20/20 at 6:43 am to AUCom96
Do y’all think Roberts is compromised or just part of the swamp himself? Mixture of both?
Posted on 10/20/20 at 6:49 am to Whodat4300
Both. We sorely need to dig deeper into why he was flying around on the Pedo Express and expose him for what he is.
Posted on 10/20/20 at 6:52 am to LSUFreek
quote:
, too, was initially scared at the possibility, but to pull off massive fraud like that is much harder than it sounds.
First, the list of names have to be verified as having not voted this year (and not dead) which won't be known until after polls close. Time consuming.
2nd, the ballot has to be filled out and signed with that person's name. Time consuming.
3rd, the post-mark has to be skillfully/credibly imperfect. Time-consuming.
4th, there will be poll watchers to verify & convince of fraud-less activity. Otherwise, the cabal of ballot-makers & ballot-counters could just make up numbers.
5th, a truckload of 20,000 imperfect post-marked ballots suddenly all arriving over 3 days would be highly scrutinized & contested.
Is it possible? yes. Improbable? most likely.
All of this assumes that the counters are acting with integrity. History shows that in Dim heavy districts this is not the case.
Posted on 10/20/20 at 6:52 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
Trump ain't Romney and he ain't McCain. If the Dems are doing this, so will he.
Bingo!
Posted on 10/20/20 at 6:53 am to BFIV
quote:
"We emphasize that voters utilizing the USPS must cast their ballots prior to 8:00 p.m. on
Election Day, like all voters, including those utilizing drop boxes, as set forth supra. We
refuse, however, to disenfranchise voters for the lack or illegibility of a postmark resulting
from the USPS processing system, which is undeniably outside the control of the
individual voter." Page 37 of the link..
It's funny how not taking up a case to not make a judicial ruling is effectively a ruling.
Posted on 10/20/20 at 6:53 am to MMauler
Those ballots have to be requested and its in the system of who received one. If they already have 20 thousand received, then what benefit does it give them to sit on them ?
Dont melt
Dont melt
Posted on 10/20/20 at 6:57 am to MMauler
quote:
Let's say that ACB is sworn in on October 27th.
Can the Republicans file a Motion for Reconsideration so that ACB can have a vote prior to November 3?
pretty sure that would be no since roberts, as chief justice, is the one who decides what cases they will or wont hear and when
Posted on 10/20/20 at 7:01 am to LSUFreek
quote:
It's been stated they have to be post-dated by Nov 3rd
Post-marked
And the USPS typically does NOT put a postmark on pre-metered/prepaid mail (for example, like the envelopes for mail in ballots).
In fact, if mail is not postmarked, there's is usually no mark at all to indicate it actually went through the mail. Which makes the whole "if received by 11/6" hilarious (as it is based in the presumption that to be received by 11/6 it would have to have been mailed on or before 11/3).
frick Roberts
Posted on 10/20/20 at 7:08 am to AnyonebutSteelers
It happened in Florida with the Bush-Gore fiasco. They kept finding disproportionate numbers of Gore votes each day. The courts finally put a stop to it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News