- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Nadler on the floor: I have not heard one substantive defense to the Preseident's crime
Posted on 12/18/19 at 1:41 pm
Posted on 12/18/19 at 1:41 pm
How does one raise a substantive defense to a crime that was made up?
25
Posted on 12/18/19 at 1:42 pm to arseinclarse
What crime?
Posted on 12/18/19 at 1:44 pm to arseinclarse
quote:
Nadler on the floor
My first thought: I thought they wobbled, but didn't fall down.
This post was edited on 12/18/19 at 3:20 pm
Posted on 12/18/19 at 1:44 pm to arseinclarse
HE DIDN'T DO ANTHING.
It doesn't get any more substantive than that. It's their job to make the case that he did something wrong, not his to prove that he didn't.
It doesn't get any more substantive than that. It's their job to make the case that he did something wrong, not his to prove that he didn't.
Posted on 12/18/19 at 1:45 pm to arseinclarse
How can one give a defense to a moving target when you aren’t allowed to call witnesses or present evidence?
Posted on 12/18/19 at 1:46 pm to arseinclarse
quote:
How does one raise a substantive defense to a crime that was made up?
Not to mention there wasn't even
made up substantive evidence to go with it. Actually the evidence presented was more substantive as evidence that a crime wasn't committed to begin with. Trump does have better evidence than what was presented though, thought he has transcripts of the phone call along with witnesses that were directly listening in.
This post was edited on 12/18/19 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 12/18/19 at 1:46 pm to Godfather1
quote:
It's their job to make the case that he did something wrong
You would think so, but the House of Representatives can impeach whenever they feel like for whatever they feel like. It's a purely partisan power that has only been used legitimately one time and that was back in 1998. Andrew Johnson, even though he was a douche, was railroaded by Radical Republicans in 1867-68.
Posted on 12/18/19 at 1:46 pm to arseinclarse
Nor has he heard one substantive piece of evidence to it
Posted on 12/18/19 at 1:46 pm to arseinclarse
I have not heard a crime to defend.
Posted on 12/18/19 at 1:47 pm to arseinclarse
I hope he shites himself...
Posted on 12/18/19 at 1:47 pm to arseinclarse
That fat piece of crap is delusional
Posted on 12/18/19 at 1:48 pm to arseinclarse
quote:
How does one raise a substantive defense to a crime that was made up?
Isn't the burden of proof on the accuser? Didn't Nadler go to law school?
Posted on 12/18/19 at 1:48 pm to Pechon
To reference A Few Good Men, Nadler missed the day they taught law in law school
Posted on 12/18/19 at 1:48 pm to teke184
He Obstructed Justice by Abusing his Power and he Abused his Power by Obstructing Justice. How much more circular do I need to get because the Democrats have laid this out ad-nauseum. Sometimes I just don't think people listen to the Democrats arguments close enough. 
Posted on 12/18/19 at 1:49 pm to arseinclarse
This is just a rich as “I have not seen or heard any exculpatory evidence.... “
Because you know, Dems prefer you’re guilty unless you can prove your innocence.
Because you know, Dems prefer you’re guilty unless you can prove your innocence.
This post was edited on 12/18/19 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 12/18/19 at 1:50 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
Andrew Johnson, even though he was a douche, was railroaded by Radical Republicans in 1867-68.
Even that at least had some basis in that Johnson arguably broke a law (albeit a bullshite law that had been ramrodded thru and was later declared unconstitutional).
Posted on 12/18/19 at 1:50 pm to Ag Zwin
quote:
Nadler on the floor My first thought: I thought they wobbled, but didn't fall down.
Gravity does not recognize politics.
Posted on 12/18/19 at 1:51 pm to MrLSU
Girls will be boys and boys will be girls.
It’s a mixed up muddled up world.
It’s a mixed up muddled up world.
Posted on 12/18/19 at 1:52 pm to arseinclarse
quote:
Nadler on the floor: I have not heard one substantive defense to the Preseident's crime
Well, duh. Of course not. You would not allow any defense witnesses to appear and testify.
This post was edited on 12/18/19 at 1:54 pm
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News