- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
White House Ukraine Expert Vindman Sought to “Correct” Transcript of Trump Call
Posted on 10/29/19 at 9:09 pm
Posted on 10/29/19 at 9:09 pm
quote:
WASHINGTON — Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, told House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that the White House transcript of a July call between President Trump and Ukraine’s president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to include them failed, according to three people familiar with the testimony.
The omissions, Colonel Vindman said, included Mr. Trump’s assertion that there were recordings of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. discussing Ukraine corruption, and an explicit mention by Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, of Burisma Holdings, the energy company whose board employed Mr. Biden’s son Hunter.
Colonel Vindman, who appeared on Capitol Hill wearing his dark blue Army dress uniform and military medals, told House impeachment investigators that he tried to change the reconstructed transcript made by the White House staff to reflect the omissions.
Failing NYT
28
Posted on 10/29/19 at 9:12 pm to Sentrius
LOL swamp rat
Posted on 10/29/19 at 9:13 pm to Sentrius
Mickey Goldmill and Big Scrub TX said that the transcript does not exist and the actual phone call is exactly what Schiff says it is.
Posted on 10/29/19 at 9:13 pm to Sentrius
Looks great for trump if true
Posted on 10/29/19 at 9:13 pm to Sentrius
So the Dems want to change the Federal evidentiary rules regarding Hearsay
-Cool
-Cool
This post was edited on 10/29/19 at 9:15 pm
Posted on 10/29/19 at 9:14 pm to Sentrius
quote:
The omissions, Colonel Vindman said, included Mr. Trump’s assertion that there were recordings of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. discussing Ukraine corruption, and an explicit mention by Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, of Burisma Holdings, the energy company whose board employed Mr. Biden’s son Hunter.
None of this stuff changes the nature of the phone call, regardless of whether you thought the original transcript[t was damning or not.
We already know that the trascript is not verbatim. It says it on the bottom.
What would including these details have changed about the transcript?
This post was edited on 10/29/19 at 9:16 pm
Posted on 10/29/19 at 9:15 pm to Sentrius
Yet still no quid pro quo, correct?
Posted on 10/29/19 at 9:31 pm to Sentrius
If an Active Duty Officer is WITHOUT permission from his CO testifying to Privileged or Classified information then he should be stripped of all rank and court martialed before being either imprisoned or dishonorably discharged or both. Also applies if his CO has forbidden cooperation in an unauthorized activity.
His CO would be the CiC, POTUS.
This former Lt. Col. now pvt. should be headed to Ft. Leavenworth until adjudicated.
His CO would be the CiC, POTUS.
This former Lt. Col. now pvt. should be headed to Ft. Leavenworth until adjudicated.
Posted on 10/29/19 at 9:31 pm to Sentrius
He is lying
Posted on 10/29/19 at 9:35 pm to Sentrius
So wait????
The dems, trying to get peach mints, instead find out we have recordings of Biden’s corrupt rear end talking about a company he is already on the record saying he knows nothing about???
lol!!!!!!!
The dems, trying to get peach mints, instead find out we have recordings of Biden’s corrupt rear end talking about a company he is already on the record saying he knows nothing about???
lol!!!!!!!
Posted on 10/29/19 at 9:35 pm to Sentrius
Wait, the first “whistleblower” said the transcript was complete. Now this guy says it’s not???
Well alrightee then
Well alrightee then
Posted on 10/29/19 at 9:45 pm to Sentrius
Lol sure.
So we are hearing about these words and phrases. What were they?
I expect they must amount to high crimes and misdemeanors. So why aren’t they being shared?
shite is getting old. If it was impeachable it would have been front page news. More selective leaking to try to shape a bullshite narrative.
So we are hearing about these words and phrases. What were they?
I expect they must amount to high crimes and misdemeanors. So why aren’t they being shared?
shite is getting old. If it was impeachable it would have been front page news. More selective leaking to try to shape a bullshite narrative.
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:04 pm to The Funnie Five
quote:
Mickey Goldmill and Big Scrub TX said that the transcript does not exist and the actual phone call is exactly what Schiff says it is.
Liar
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:13 pm to Sentrius
LOL
Posted on 10/29/19 at 10:20 pm to Sentrius
quote:
included Mr. Trump’s assertion that there were recordings of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. discussing Ukraine corruption,
There are.
quote:
and an explicit mention by Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, of Burisma Holdings, the energy company whose board employed Mr. Biden’s son Hunter.
Which was the company being investigated by the prosecutor fired by Biden himself. The one he discusses on tape.
All NYT has done is report that the this Col stated the record should read that there are tapes of Biden bragging about having the prosecutor fired by directly threatening billions in aid.
They can put whatever slant they want on it. Theres nothing here except Biden. Mentioning something everyone already knows isn't impeachable last I checked.
Posted on 10/29/19 at 11:09 pm to Sidicous
quote:
His CO would be the CiC, POTUS.
I'm pretty sure his CO would be the first General Officer in his chain of command.
Posted on 10/29/19 at 11:36 pm to Sentrius
How does a swampy rad like that hang on in a new admin? A liar being quoted by a lying publication. Ok there are likely recordings of Biden discussing corruption and there are recordings of Trump decrying corruption since that's his job. Great! And so what if the words Burisma Holdings were mentioned by THE PRESIDENT of UKRAINE. He's not the subject of an impeachment. What a frigging joke this whole episode is.
The Bidens were corrupt. Trump wanted the corruption stopped. That's the story. And that is the Dems case here? What the actual hell!
The Bidens were corrupt. Trump wanted the corruption stopped. That's the story. And that is the Dems case here? What the actual hell!
Posted on 10/29/19 at 11:38 pm to Sentrius
quote:
White House Ukraine Expert Vindman Sought to “Correct” Transcript of Trump Call
Can you give the Cliff's on this. Does this mean that important information was left off the original transcript or is Vindman trying to inject additional information on the transcript? Is he suggesting that information has intentionally been left off?
Posted on 10/30/19 at 1:45 am to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
White House Ukraine Expert Vindman Sought to “Correct” Transcript of Trump Call
Can you give the Cliff's on this. Does this mean that important information was left off the original transcript or is Vindman trying to inject additional information on the transcript? Is he suggesting that information has intentionally been left off?
He's basically saying if he had been allowed to alter the Transcript he could have made Orange Man Bad....
Posted on 10/30/19 at 1:48 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Looks great for trump if true
How can it be good for Trump if there was conversation not included in the transcription?
Page 1 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News