- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: White House Ukraine Expert Vindman Sought to “Correct” Transcript of Trump Call
Posted on 10/30/19 at 1:49 am to Covingtontiger77
Posted on 10/30/19 at 1:49 am to Covingtontiger77
quote:
So the Dems want to change the Federal evidentiary rules regarding Hearsay
Colonel Vindman was on the phone call.
0
Posted on 10/30/19 at 1:52 am to texridder
quote:
How can it be good for Trump if there was conversation not included in the transcription?
This guy sought to alter the official record with his own interpretation of the call. Its absolute bullshite
Posted on 10/30/19 at 2:12 am to More&Les
quote:
This guy sought to alter the official record with his own interpretation of the call. Its absolute bull shite
You are clueless. Do you think he would testify against Trump and in front of Congress if it wasn't true?
SMH.
What about the ellipses in the transcription?
Posted on 10/30/19 at 4:04 am to texridder
Yes he would dipshit
Posted on 10/30/19 at 5:24 am to texridder
quote:
You are clueless. Do you think he would testify against Trump and in front of Congress if it wasn't true
Because no one has ever lied to congress and again, he might very well believe his interpretation that doesn't change a thing. Also, you do understand, Trump didn't create or alter the Transcript, correct?
This guy sought to have it altered through the same official channels that created it and all other official POTUS communication transcripts and was told to pound sand.
This guy is a tds infected deep state clown who should have his career demolished as a result of his multiple breaches of military code...
This post was edited on 10/30/19 at 5:27 am
Posted on 10/30/19 at 6:30 am to texridder
quote:
You are clueless. Do you think he would testify against Trump and in front of Congress if it wasn't true?
Seriously? Well let’s see
Would congress put a senile, stuttering, man who can’t remember major points in his own report to lead a special counsel investigation? A special counsel investigation that cost tens of millions and turned up absolutely nothing? A special counsel investigation that was filled with hacks that have expressed complete bias against the subject of the investigation? And this stuttering man embarrass himself and show himself as a horrible choice as the lead of the investigation?
Would someone be drug in front of Senate committee to testify against a Supreme Court nominee who cannot remember basic facts, name a single corroborating witness, identity the exact location, or provide anything else but a sobbing story in which she cant prove a single thing?
Would a congressional house committee chairman open a public hearing, and put on the record, a completely false account of a transcript that he admittedly replaced with his own lies? In a hearing related to the impeachment of a sitting President??
Would the head of the FBI be complicit in certifying a fake dossier as fact to a FISA court judge? To spy on a presidential campaign?
And you believe that is out of the realm of possibility?
This post was edited on 10/30/19 at 6:31 am
Posted on 10/30/19 at 6:32 am to Sentrius
He’s full of shite. Unless there is an actual recording of the call backing up his claims, then he is pulling that out of his arse.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 6:48 am to Sentrius
President Pelosi?
Posted on 10/30/19 at 7:41 am to texridder
quote:
texridder
Ladies and Gentlemen, we have a believer. A true believer!!!
>Posted on 10/30/19 at 7:43 am to Sentrius
He's only mad because his foreign policy goals aren't the same as the president's, and we all know the Constitution puts all matters regarding FP into the hands of Deep State bureaucrats. M PEACH!
Posted on 10/30/19 at 7:46 am to Sentrius
quote:
Vindman
Seems shady as all get out. I'm surprised Mueller didn't go after him...
Posted on 10/30/19 at 7:47 am to SSpaniel
DixRider believed Chrissy Blowsey as well.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 7:52 am to Jbird
I don't understand why anyone here engages Tex.
These pedo loving, terrorist supporting traitors on the left need to be left alone.
These pedo loving, terrorist supporting traitors on the left need to be left alone.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:20 am to texridder
quote:
What about the ellipses in the transcription?
:lol: those damn ellipses..
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:21 am to Jbird
quote:
DixRider believed Chrissy Blowsey as well.
Most likely still does.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:22 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:Ask him to link the post in which you allegedly said this. (Clearly it does not exist).quote:Liar
Mickey Goldmill and Big Scrub TX said that the transcript does not exist and the actual phone call is exactly what Schiff says it is.
I will never understand the pleasure these people seem to get from telling blatant lies about other posters. IRL, it would get them ostracized by friends, coworkers and assorted acquaintances. Here, it gets them upvotes.
Online culture is strange. It is almost like anti-social misfits think that anonymity allows them to discard all normal rules of social discourse.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:22 am to bayouvette
quote:
those damn ellipses..
They could have been for anything.
Rather than type "Trump takes drink of water", "Clearing of throat" or "Ukranian president comments on how hot Ivanka is" they put in ellipses.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:27 am to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:Exactly.quote:Can you give the Cliff's on this. Does this mean that important information was left off the original transcript or is Vindman trying to inject additional information on the transcript? Is he suggesting that information has intentionally been left off?
White House Ukraine Expert Vindman Sought to “Correct” Transcript of Trump Call
if you believe that these omissions were actually items discussed during the conversation, SOMEONE does not want an accurate transcript. But whom? And why? Trump sycophants will obviously believe one thing, and others will believe something else. We will never know the answer
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:29 am to More&Les
quote:Not at all. Part of what he wanted to add cuts one direction, and part of what he wanted to add cuts the other. (funny sidenote. Apple dictation software capitalized “One Direction,”. Some at Apple likes bad music.)quote:He's basically saying if he had been allowed to alter the Transcript he could have made Orange Man Bad....
White House Ukraine Expert Vindman Sought to “Correct” Transcript of Trump Call
Can you give the Cliff's on this. Does this mean that important information was left off the original transcript or is Vindman trying to inject additional information on the transcript? Is he suggesting that information has intentionally been left off?
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:31 am to Covingtontiger77
quote:What relevance does any of this have to the rules of evidence? People correction deposition errors all the time, and those transcripts involve a stenographer.
So the Dems want to change the Federal evidentiary rules regarding Hearsay
This post was edited on 10/30/19 at 8:32 am
Page 2 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News