- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should have been a interception
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:31 am to lrlafayette
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:31 am to lrlafayette
I did not see it either, but the talking heads did. LSU got jobbed so far as officiating is concerned.
1
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:34 am to tLSU
Correct. Incomplete pass was the correct call in this situation
I thought overall, the refs did a really good job officiating the game. The blatant calls were made, and the ticky tack shite was not called. That’s how big games are supposed to be officiated
I thought overall, the refs did a really good job officiating the game. The blatant calls were made, and the ticky tack shite was not called. That’s how big games are supposed to be officiated
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:35 am to LSUStar
quote:
I did not see it either, but the talking heads did. LSU got jobbed so far as officiating is concerned.
I don’t think you know what this means
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:37 am to Mr. Hangover
Dude ball hit the ground. And even if it didn't stingley was out of bounds before he got possession. 3rd down conversation yalls receiver didn't catch that ball. We can play the what if game all day. What if texas kicks field goals instead of slamming sam and Ingram into the teeth of the defense? What if keontay does dropped a wide open td?
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:39 am to lrlafayette
Regardless of whether the ball touched the ground or not. The next step in the review was he had his foot out of bounds before he had control of the ball. Incomplete on that point as well.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:39 am to lrlafayette
Incompletion.
He was out of bounds before he possessed it.
He was out of bounds before he possessed it.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:40 am to notiger1997
They made the right call. Ball hit the ground.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:42 am to Hook Em Horns
quote:
What if texas kicks field goals instead of slamming sam and Ingram into the teeth of the defense?
one FG...that was all part of the same series of plays. If you kick the first FG there is no goaline interception to set up a second goaline chance for FG.
Even if you had those two FG's thats 6 points, you lost by 7
quote:
What if keontay does dropped a wide open td?
Then there are no FGs at all and if we are getting back dropped TD passes LSU also dropped a touchdown pass.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:43 am to nitwit
Man some of the rant just kills me with the conspiracy theories all the time. Yall have a great football team. Texas just surprised lsu and the fans. Yall thought we were the texas of Charlie strong era. That team is long gone. No quit in this team.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:44 am to lrlafayette
If it had been ruled an INT on the field, it probably stands.
But there was no way during replay to definitively determine that it didn't touch the ground so they weren't going to flip it to a INT via replay.
I really didn't have an issue with the decision.
But there was no way during replay to definitively determine that it didn't touch the ground so they weren't going to flip it to a INT via replay.
I really didn't have an issue with the decision.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:46 am to lrlafayette
Should have been incompletion with offensive pass interference for a push off.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:48 am to rohinaz
quote:
Ball hit the ground. 1 camera angle had it clearly
There was definitely not one camera angle that showed it hit the ground “clearly”
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:50 am to LSUZombie
There absolutely was. It wasn't hidden behind a limb, it wasn't in the corner of the screen. It was front and center and the ball clearly hit the ground.
Not a single reasonable person would disagree.
Not a single reasonable person would disagree.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:56 am to LSUcajun77
Wasn't it called an interception on the field? Losing view of the ball for a split second on replay shouldn't be enough to overturn the call on the field. It has to be conclusive and it wasn't.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 2:10 pm to tLSU
quote:
An angle very clearly showed half the ball on the ground. Are you trolling?
No, it absolutely didn't "clearly" show that, it showed the ball against the receiver's thigh, in Stingly's hand very near the ground but it did not apear to touch, plus, Stingly "clearly" already had possession
Posted on 9/8/19 at 2:22 pm to Mr. Hangover
I know what it means. It means that UT oline could hold all game long with impunity. That's what it means.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 2:22 pm to More&Les
You are so "clearly" wrong. Watch a game replay and then come back here.
Posted on 9/8/19 at 2:25 pm to Gris Gris
I can’t believe some are still trying to say it didn’t hit the ground.
I mean this should be up for debate.
I was watching with four other people and somehow we all saw the replay with that one good angle and all of us acknowledged that it hit the ground
I mean this should be up for debate.
I was watching with four other people and somehow we all saw the replay with that one good angle and all of us acknowledged that it hit the ground
Posted on 9/8/19 at 2:41 pm to notiger1997
Same here. Everyone agreed it was an incompletion. That's not what we wanted to believe, of course, but it was obvious on the replays. It was almost a fantastic play. Still was, really, since it was incomplete.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News