- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What did the Clintons do that caused the Russians to help Trump
Posted on 7/24/19 at 10:31 am
Posted on 7/24/19 at 10:31 am
It’s well documented that the Clintons are/have been in comfortable relationships with powerful Russians.
What did they do to sour this relationship?
What did they do to sour this relationship?
Posted on 7/24/19 at 10:33 am to Eli Goldfinger
She tried to prevent Putin from being re-elected, didn’t she?
Posted on 7/24/19 at 10:34 am to ezride25
Hillary wanted to get into a proxy war/hot war with them in Syria.
Posted on 7/24/19 at 10:37 am to TigerNutwhack
They interfered in the Russian election. The irony!
Posted on 7/24/19 at 10:43 am to Eli Goldfinger
quote:
Russians to help Trump
Posted on 7/24/19 at 10:44 am to Eli Goldfinger
quote:
with powerful Russians
they were tied to SOME Russians
Posted on 7/24/19 at 10:49 am to Eli Goldfinger
Consider the following; it is widely known that the Clintons are for sale, she was a key driver of restored diplomatic relations with Russia as SOS, Republicans were hawkish on Russia pre-2016, and she signed off on the uranium one deal. Why on earth would Russians NOT want her elected? All they needed to do was pay Bill to give speeches and they would have had anything they wanted.
Posted on 7/24/19 at 10:58 am to Eli Goldfinger
The Russians felt that Trump would weaken the US more than the Clinton's would.
Posted on 7/24/19 at 11:01 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
The Russians felt that Trump would weaken the US more than the Clinton's would.
I wouldn't say "weaken"
You could argue that their mentality was to get him elected to cause the most disruption, but not "weaken"
Besides, what's the evidence that they specifically did things only to prop up Trump?
Posted on 7/24/19 at 11:12 am to upgrayedd
quote:
the most disruption
In terms of international influence, disruption = weaken.
quote:
Besides, what's the evidence that they specifically did things only to prop up Trump?
That would be, the, uh, well, I believe that's included in the, uh, well...
...Could you repeat the question?
quote:
Besides, what's the evidence that they specifically did things only to prop up Trump?
I'll have to refer you to the report.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News