- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/11/19 at 6:45 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Examining these quotes, they’re right. Most people are just loud winds blowing through trees. Making a lot of noise but saying nothing. Most ideas shouldn’t be entertained.
But social media has now broadcast everyone’s every single thought to the masses if desired
But social media has now broadcast everyone’s every single thought to the masses if desired
Posted on 2/11/19 at 6:54 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Yes, absolutely. I like this. I don't even need to make an argument when you do it for me. I'll just let you dig your own hole.
Oh. Now I get it. You’re just trolling.
Carry on loser.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 6:57 am to Robin Masters
quote:
Oh. Now I get it. You’re just trolling.
Nope.
Just pointing out that this...
quote:
Theory = idea that just hasn’t yet been proven wrong.
...is wrong.
You're not trolling or you wouldn't be melting about others trolling. Unless there's some other reason that you posted that, the obvious answer is that you don't actually know what a theory is.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 7:00 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
You're not trolling or you wouldn't be melting about others trolling. Unless there's some other reason that you posted that, the obvious answer is that you don't actually know what a theory is.
Nope. You’re wrong.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 7:00 am to mattloc
Have always been fascinated by pictures of animals trapped in amber, or fossilized tree sap. Almost invariably, these are dated to tens of millions of years, and look almost exactly like their modern day descendants.
Looks like a scorpion to me.
Looks like a lizard.
Looks like a baby bird.
Looks like a bee.
Looks like a flea.
Looks like a spider.
Looks like a scorpion to me.
Looks like a lizard.
Looks like a baby bird.
Looks like a bee.
Looks like a flea.
Looks like a spider.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 7:02 am to Robin Masters
quote:
Oh. Now I get it. You’re just trolling.
Yeah don’t respond. Over 40000 posts the guys just obstinant with no facts to support his obstanance. It’s his schtick. My 8 year old has weapons grade oppositional obstinance, it’s all an act.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 7:04 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
You're not trolling or you wouldn't be melting about others trolling. Unless there's some other reason that you posted that, the obvious answer is that you don't actually know what a theory is.
Oh for god's sakes. You really are a simpleton.
Once upon a time Plate Tectonics was a ludicrous idea.
Once upon a time, Lord Kelvin confidently stated the earth was only 100 million years old, and no one dared to question the august gentleman.
There have been lots of theories. Lots of them were ideas that were proven wrong.
You are not a man. You are a man who has turned himself into a bot.
I demand you change your handle to "MindlessBuckeye."
Posted on 2/11/19 at 7:06 am to ItNeverRains
quote:
Yeah don’t respond. Over 40000 posts the guys just obstinant with no facts to support his obstanance. It’s his schtick. My 8 year old has weapons grade oppositional obstinance, it’s all an act.
Thx
I guess I never noticed him before. Cheers.
This post was edited on 2/11/19 at 7:08 am
Posted on 2/11/19 at 7:30 am to DisplacedBuckeye
I'm not sure who is asserting what here, but accepting theory as absolute, or settled science, is not science at all. OTOH, denying theory as vast probability is not science either. See quantum theory as an example of both.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 7:45 am to NC_Tigah
These threads are always so much fun 
A good book for people on both sides in this thread to read is “Wonderful Life” by Stephen Jay Gould. It’s on the Burgess Shale. Gould was a science professor at Harvard
A good book for people on both sides in this thread to read is “Wonderful Life” by Stephen Jay Gould. It’s on the Burgess Shale. Gould was a science professor at Harvard
Posted on 2/11/19 at 7:46 am to Perfect Circle
quote:Have you seen a T.rex in amber?
Have always been fascinated by pictures of animals trapped in amber, or fossilized tree sap. Almost invariably, these are dated to tens of millions of years, and look almost exactly like their modern day descendants.
Looks like a scorpion to me.
Looks like a lizard.
Looks like a baby bird.
Looks like a bee.
Looks like a flea.
Looks like a spider.
If you did, would it look like an owl?
Have you seen an owl in amber dating back to the time of T. rex?
OTOH pine trees have scarcely changed over the last 140 million years.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 7:50 am to ItNeverRains
quote:
no facts
So you don't know what a theory is, either?
Posted on 2/11/19 at 7:51 am to Sunbeam
quote:
Sunbeam
Jesus Christ.
I always wonder how some of you made it through high school.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 7:52 am to Nguyener
quote:
Intellegent Design
When I consider how unlikely it is that life arose spontaneously, I have to conclude that a designer is behind the entirety of creation.
All the catechism classes in the world are wasted on me. The randomness of spontaneous life is the clincher for me.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 8:07 am to NC_Tigah
I think it's generally accepted that Australopithecus was an early ancestor of modern humans. What is unclear, however, is the tremendous development in brain size from Australopithecus to the early Homo ancestors. How, and why, are humans so much smarter than any other creature on the face of the earth, including his early forebears?
Posted on 2/11/19 at 8:09 am to NC_Tigah
I'm not saying flora and fauna doesn't adapt and change physically, but if these organism change this infinitesimal amount over tens of millions of years, how did we go from monkeys to humans in just 3 million years?
Is evolution partial to higher order intelligence; do higher order animals evolve faster?
Is evolution partial to higher order intelligence; do higher order animals evolve faster?
Posted on 2/11/19 at 8:10 am to m2pro
quote:
Nearly everyone who gets swept up in these debates fears whatever the truth is.
Make no mistake, there's a Devine Creator......, the Almighty is a living God. To believe for one second that the complex nature of this undefinable reality came from some spontaneous and random series of events takes much more faith than believing in the Creator. Remember what God told Moses when Moses asked God,
Exodus 3:13
And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them?
Exodus 3:14
And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.
What answer would a man give if asked that question? I can assure you it wouldn't be,
"I AM"
Posted on 2/11/19 at 8:10 am to mattloc
quote:
1,000 doctoral scientists
Phds in theology don't count
Posted on 2/11/19 at 8:11 am to mattloc
quote:
Over 1,000 doctoral scientists
Well if the measuring stick for climate change was "over 1000 scientists we surveyed agree" then surely, the left will accept this on face value.
Page 5 of 29
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News