Started By
Message

re: It’s pretty much fact the earth flooded around 12,000 years ago (younger dryas)

Posted on 1/11/19 at 4:07 pm to
Posted by Bow to Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
1830 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 4:07 pm to
Are you hypothesizing that they work jointly?

Mars doesn’t have an electromagnetic field and is neither getting farther or closer (so I’m told), so it cannot be entirely based on electromagnetism.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57437 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

Right, but I posted a few pages back that even if all ice on Earth converted to water, sealevel would only rise about 225 ft according to national geographic.


ONLY 225? Ok. Thanks for proving my point.

Did they discuss the change in temperature and climate as well resulting from this rise in water levels over 225 feet?

Changing weather patterns? Coastal erosion and collapse?

It’s a 100% fact several standing cities and structures have been discovered hundreds of feet under water all over the world. How’d they get there?
Posted by Bow to Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
1830 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

It’s a 100% fact several standing cities and structures have been discovered hundreds of feet under water all over the world. How’d they get there?


Agreed. The 225ft is somewhat irrelevant. There was obviously more ice and lower sea levels in the past. People will always live close the the seas.
Posted by Fourteen28
Member since Aug 2018
1156 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

It’s pretty much fact


Thanks for the link

ETA:
quote:

It’s a 100% fact several standing cities and structures have been discovered hundreds of feet under water


Link?
This post was edited on 1/11/19 at 4:31 pm
Posted by League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
10340 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Right, but I posted a few pages back that even if all ice on Earth converted to water, sealevel would only rise about 225 ft according to national geographic.

Well, that's meaningless, since the current school of thought is that the Earth was completely covered by a crust. Mountains, seas, canyons would not have existed. As the water trapped below the crust was heated by the core, it broke forth. Causing the separation of land masses, pushing the mountains up, and folding them on top of other layers, and also carving out the canyons.

225 feet would have easily flooded the existing Earth, and then immediately retreated into the canyons that were formed when the land masses shifted away from its origin.
Posted by IceTiger
Really hot place
Member since Oct 2007
26584 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

Perhaps the earth actually orbited on a different axis (and revolved around the sun much faster) before the comet hit us 13,000 years ago. This would explain 2 things:

1. People across all cultures lived several hundred years (because of the increased revolution)


Occam's Razor says it's more likely a gene failure, mutation, modification...

Than...

A sufficiciently massive comet powerful enough to hit Earth...
Enough to keep it on the same orbital path, but would slow it down 1/15th it's speed...

Because that event is no where in the tune outside the least likely probability in the universe.

Think, dude, we sell glow in the dark fish in grocery stores and have lab grown the most genetically fast racehorses of all time...
That's a much simpler explanation...supposing Sumerians, Jews, Indians and Egyptians were right about having long lived humans in their era.
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 4:51 pm to
A global event did happen.

Results of the event are not what you say.
Posted by IceTiger
Really hot place
Member since Oct 2007
26584 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

Link?

There's a thing called "research", but here's a nudge...

Dwarka sank 9500ish years ago
Posted by Fourteen28
Member since Aug 2018
1156 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 4:53 pm to
This is OP's thread. The burden of links lies on him.
Posted by IceTiger
Really hot place
Member since Oct 2007
26584 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

A global event did happen


It's looking like a building sized comet hit greenland...

Causing all the problems
Posted by IceTiger
Really hot place
Member since Oct 2007
26584 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

This is OP's thread. The burden of links lies on him.

You live by shitty made up rules, die by shitty made up rules
Posted by genuineLSUtiger
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
73023 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

2. Places like Antarctica being tropical


Massive pole shift caused it to reposition to more frigid latitudes.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57437 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

Massive pole shift caused it to reposition to more frigid latitudes.


That’s exactly what I said.

My explanation is the pole shift was caused by an impact
Posted by genuineLSUtiger
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
73023 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 5:19 pm to
You microdosing that psilocybin yet? It looks like it is paying off if so.
Posted by Geauxboy
NW Arkansas
Member since Oct 2006
4856 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 5:29 pm to
Earth is roughly 6,000 years old and day/night has always been 24 hours.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 5:35 pm to
quote:


The flood stories permeate the entire world from Japan to Africa to North America


But where did the water come from
Posted by Sasquatch Smash
Member since Nov 2007
24078 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

The nighttime of lighter gravity (where the Kings saw nothing but the constellations) created a culture where the stars were a sign of something we, as humans, are tied to...


Haven’t read this whole thread nor am I an expert on astronomy/astrology throughout history, but wouldn’t the constellations (the night’s sky) have had to change if this comet changed the axis of the earth? Antediluvian Egyptian’s would have looked at different stars than those we see now and those for which I’m sure there is a record in their hieroglyphs.

quote:

demigods - it seems they may have actually existed before the flood.


Is this thread all the evidence you’re using to support this position?
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11091 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

Haven’t read this whole thread nor am I an expert on astronomy/astrology throughout history, but wouldn’t the constellations (the night’s sky) have had to change if this comet changed the axis of the earth? Antediluvian Egyptian’s would have looked at different stars than those we see now and those for which I’m sure there is a record in their hieroglyphs.


Personally, I do not think the axis changed

Look at the similarities of Earth, Mars, Saturn



The impact of the proximity of Saturn (the old sun) would have potentially altered the physical conditions on Earth

https://saturndeathcult.com/the-sturn-death-cult-part-1/a-timeless-age-in-a-purple-haze/






Dancing Right In Front Of Me"

Maybe I should have shown you a clearer plainer truth
That doesn't care about summer and less about youth
Now in this silence what more is there to do
Something has broken in me and in you

In watchful dependence a satellite spins
Cautiously circling the space that I'm in
It's bouncing me signals - distorted by time
And I'm stuck here waiting for the stars to align

Dancing right in front of me, all the lives I once could see
Slipping to and slipping fro, disappearing
Who's to know where they have gone - just out of sight
Into the shadows of my night
Who started out as stars in my eyes

There's a wide horizon, go on now take a chance
Your star is shining it lights a brighter path
It's all there inside you, take one day at a time
Reeling, freewheeling, I want to watch you fly
Posted by genuineLSUtiger
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
73023 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 6:23 pm to
TPA you are too good for the people on the OT. Comprehension of esoteric subjects here is on about a third or fourth grade level.
Posted by GetmorewithLes
UK Basketball Fan
Member since Jan 2011
19104 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

increased revolution speed lead to lighter gravity.


wrong. Increased revolution speed would lead to higher gravity.

Also if gravity effects were different then animal strengths would adjust accordingly. Like people who spend too much time in low/zero gravity can barely support themselves when returned to normal gravity.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram