Started By
Message

re: Accuser’s Lawyer: It’s Not Her Job To Corroborate Her Story

Posted on 9/18/18 at 12:12 am to
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 12:12 am to
quote:

Her only “job” is to tell the truth. She has no obligation to find other witnesses to the satisfaction of Republican senators or this message board. That’s a fool’s errand.


Well, if she wants to be taken seriously, she does. Otherwise call the vote.
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
31622 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 3:07 am to
this all started with Title 9 (sorry, Romans: IX) bullshite on campuses. Use guilty until proven innocent to further whatever agenda you happen to be pushing on any given day, and let the bodies fall where they may.
This post was edited on 9/18/18 at 3:08 am
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 3:21 am to
She’s pushing for the FBI to investigate. It’s not her job to find evidence; it’s theirs. I’m sure she’s willing to assist in that, but no, it’s not her job.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53533 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 3:26 am to
It's not the job of the FBI to go on wild chases. They are too busy getting docs to make public!
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
80335 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 3:32 am to
quote:

First step for the lawyer getting the woman not to appear next Monday?


Yeah.

That ludicrous claim is just setting it up. She’s not gonna show.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124607 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 4:52 am to
quote:

Debra Katz, the attorney for the woman accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, said that it is not her client’s job to corroborate her claims.
In fairness, though that is indeed the #metoo philosophy, it really is not what Katz was saying.

She is saying it isn't Ford's responsibility to interview witnesses, it is the responsibility of investigators. That's actually true.

But even if this thing went down exactly as she describes, there would be no other witnesses. After all, she claims she skulked out without talking to anyone after the supposed attack.

This post was edited on 9/18/18 at 4:55 am
Posted by tigger1
Member since Mar 2005
3477 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 5:04 am to
Let me see here, super left wing professor, hates Trump, donates all the time to the demarcated party, mother of the Judge was the one who heard her mother and father's case in the 90's, and she does not have to prove anything.

Yes set up all the way and there should be no more hearings.

Can not remember the night, the party, where the party took place etc., for if she names a date, place and time easier to track her story down.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
22787 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 5:53 am to
quote:

She’s pushing for the FBI to investigate. It’s not her job to find evidence; it’s theirs. I’m sure she’s willing to assist in that, but no, it’s not her job.


It’s not her job to tell the FBI what to investigate
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124607 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:18 am to
quote:

Judge was the one who heard her mother and father's case in the 90's
Much is being made of Kavanaugh's mother being a Judge overseeing the Blasey foreclosure action. Much is also being made of her finding in favor of the Blaseys. Neither is conclusive regarding motivation. It may just be one hell of a coincidence. Another coincidence is Blasey's brother being a lawyer at a firm where he or his colleagues almost certainly would have crossed paths with Kavanaugh and his mother.

This post was edited on 9/18/18 at 6:26 am
Posted by Macfly
BR & DS
Member since Jan 2016
8171 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:21 am to
quote:

Debra Katz, the attorney

Her job is to create doubt and to hell with the truth.
Posted by Mulat
Avalon Bch, FL
Member since Sep 2010
17517 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:24 am to
quote:

If Kav wanted to play hardball and sue her for defamation it damn sure would be her job. If this thing gets derailed She better be prepared for that lawsuit.


I sincerely hope that this is headed this way, bankruptcy for all involved would be wonderful
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:29 am to
Of course it isn’t. But it’s an issue the FBI handles; they perform the background checks on Supreme Court justice nominees.
Posted by Nguyener
Kame House
Member since Mar 2013
20603 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:30 am to
quote:

Accuser’s Lawyer: It’s Not Her Job To Corroborate Her Story


Plaintiff Lawyer gonna plaintiff lawyer
Posted by SupaG
Down the Bayou
Member since Sep 2018
76 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:31 am to
quote:

it is not her client’s job to corroborate her claims


Yes, it is.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
22787 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:33 am to
quote:

Of course it isn’t. But it’s an issue the FBI handles; they perform the background checks on Supreme Court justice nominees


And they’ve done their job. They didn’t discover this because it’s completely fabricated and unworthy of investigation. It was brought out as a Hail Mary when the Dems failed to stop Kavanaugh in other ways. Not the FBIs job to help
Score political points for Dems..at least it isn’t now that Comey is gone.
Posted by burdhead
WOMP WOMP!!
Member since Apr 2017
6008 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:35 am to
quote:

VOR
you work very hard to be an imbecile, don't you?...congratulations!!!! your hard work is paying off
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6571 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:36 am to
quote:

But it’s an issue the FBI handles; they perform the background checks on Supreme Court justice nominees.
Then you are aware that kavanaugh has been checked by the fbi 6 times already during his career advancement.
Posted by HueyP
Lubbock
Member since Nov 2008
3155 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:44 am to
quote:

We all know this is fake. We all know this is an obvious political attack. It's so obvious and the Democrats will pay for this politically.

No they won’t. Their voting base gobbles this propaganda up. It wouldn’t surprise me if this charade worked perfectly. I’m wondering if the republicans have the guts to call this out.
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:47 am to
Without knowledge of this accusation? Yes.
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
73633 posts
Posted on 9/18/18 at 6:52 am to
We are witnessing some of the most ridiculous shite in history.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram