Started By
Message

re: So is overtly misleading (aka, lying to) the FISA court to obtain a warrant not illegal?

Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:48 pm to
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46686 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

lying to judges is now not illegal. perjury must not exist anymore.


Y’all evidently haven’t been paying close attention, we had a presidential candidate destroy subpoenaed evidence, smashed cell phones, lie about it and walked free, does any of this FBI corruption surprise you?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119554 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

they're trying to justify using an unverified, partisan piece of opposition research paid for by the political opponent of the proposed target, and all the LEO have to do is swear the document exist (and leave out all the bad characteristics)


So that’s how they are parsing it.

The FBI swore that the dossier exists.

They did not aware to its content.

But the judge probably issued the warrant based on the content.
Posted by beaverfever
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2008
32871 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

How so?
Lying to a federal court. They said they had probable cause and they didn't. They said they had multiple sources and they didn't. They swore to the legitimacy of their evidence and it was bullshite.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425837 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

The FBI swore that the dossier exists.

They did not aware to its content.

if they swore to the contents, THEN that's illegal

i'm assuming there aren't real allegations of criminal behavior...like the best case scenario
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
18157 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

Where did we learn that someone paid the media to run fake stories?


I think they were leaks from upcoming memos that said DOJ/Fusion paid 3 media folks to run fake stories.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20982 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

So is overtly misleading (aka, lying to) the FISA court to obtain a warrant not illegal?


I find it interesting that judges in a secret court are supposed to believe every word spoken to them without question, as this line of thinking implies.

Its almost like the law was setup to allow the govt to have the appearance of impartiality while literally agreeing with one side, unopposed 99% of the time.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80548 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:59 pm to
Seems like all of this could be cleared up if we saw the source documents, no?
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20982 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

if they swore to the contents, THEN that's illegal



Lets go over how they would get prosecuted...

You think a US attorney is going to be following up every affidavit made by an affiant in a secret court that only the judges and affiants know about?

Because if a prosecuting attorney doesnt even know if theres been an application made, how can he prosecute for perjury, etc?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425837 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

Seems like all of this could be cleared up if we saw the source documents, no?

oh i want it all released
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83694 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:02 pm to
you think the memo is enough to spark a broader investigation?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425837 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:08 pm to
for Congressional Republicans? why not
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 2:57 pm to
it's not only perjury, it's freaking treason. a group of highly placed political operatives tried to take over the executive branch of the govt by undermining the election. they underestimated the opposition to their actions because honestly, they didn't really try to hide it.

and the bit about the fbi acknowledging the contents of the dossier, you wouldn't even be in front of a fisa court unless you believed the contents were actionable. moreover, that doesn't justify paying foreign operatives, using the msm, other perjury, etc. so that line of reasoning is stupid.
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
45615 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 3:01 pm to
As a former prosecutor who asked for judges to sign off on many an arrest order (easy btw...they wholly depend on the prosecutor being a just and principled person), if I ever had used fraudulent evidence to obtain an arrest order, I would not only have been fired, disbarred, sued, but also arrested myself.
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
45615 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 3:02 pm to
But I was a lowly prosecutor.

I wasn’t above the law like some other people.

Cough
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99663 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

That's the standard we're looking for in the highest levels of federal law enforcement IMO


They probably even sprinkled a little crack on it for good measure.

Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92877 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

So is overtly misleading (aka, lying to) the FISA court to obtain a warrant not illegal?


Maybe not but I would think that overtly misleading (aka, lying to) the FISA court to obtain a warrant with the intent of stealing the presidential election would be..
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

if I ever had used fraudulent evidence to obtain an arrest order, I would not only have been fired, disbarred, sued, but also arrested myself.
so it's not "illegal" per se. just unethical.

but were you ever trying to steal the presidential election? see, that's not illegal. whatever lowly crimes you were pursuing, oh yeah. that's way worse.
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48699 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 3:49 pm to
If it is not in clear violation of multiple criminal laws, and there are not at least 10 cases of conviction that have all been upheld on appeal, then whatever a Democrat or his agent does is LEGAL !!

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram