- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
So is overtly misleading (aka, lying to) the FISA court to obtain a warrant not illegal?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:38 pm
I’m hearing this from the MSM defenders. It’s highly unethical but not illegal.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:40 pm to GumboPot
quote:
I’m hearing this from the MSM defenders. It’s highly unethical but not illegal.
I'm pretty sure paying media to run fake stories and then using said fake stories as "corroboration" is breaking a few laws.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:41 pm to GumboPot
lying to judges is now not illegal.
perjury must not exist anymore.
perjury must not exist anymore.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:41 pm to GumboPot
It's perjury at the very least.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:42 pm to GumboPot
quote:
It’s highly unethical but not illegal.
That's the standard we're looking for in the highest levels of federal law enforcement IMO
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:42 pm to GumboPot
The fisa court is set up that way for a reason
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:42 pm to notsince98
quote:Where did we learn that someone paid the media to run fake stories?
I'm pretty sure paying media to run fake stories and then using said fake stories as "corroboration" is breaking a few laws.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:42 pm to CptBengal
And yet, Flynn is in trouble for lying to the FBI. How ironic!
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:42 pm to beaverfever
quote:
It's perjury at the very least.
How so?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:42 pm to GumboPot
Fraud on the court, multiple times. Plus perjury when combined with testimony to Congress
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:43 pm to BogeyGolf
quote:Steele supposedly leaked some stuff to yahoo news, and yahoo news was then used as a second, independent source in the fisa application.
Where did we learn that someone paid the media to run fake stories?
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:43 pm to Damone
quote:
That's the standard we're looking for in the highest levels of federal law enforcement IMO
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:43 pm to BogeyGolf
Yeah I don't know why the DNC would pay the media to run fake stories when they'll do it for free. Haven't heard that.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:43 pm to GumboPot
Why even require an affidavit, then? Hell, why get the Judge/Court involved at all? Just make anything they want, fair game on anyone's whim who wants it. That's basically what they're saying here.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:44 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:Yeh I read that, but I haven't ready anywhere that someone paid the media. That would be a different level. Media usually runs stuff free or sometimes pays to run stuff to get ratings. To me they are just being pawns in the game but weren't paid.
Steele supposedly leaked some stuff to yahoo news, and yahoo news was then used as a second, independent source in the fisa application.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:45 pm to beaverfever
quote:
It's perjury at the very least.
Remember the Dems believe the ends justify the means. They can break any law they want because it’s for their cause.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:45 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Why even require an affidavit, then? Hell, why get the Judge/Court involved at all? Just make anything they want, fair game on anyone's whim who wants it. That's basically what they're saying here.
Exactly. It makes no sense.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:45 pm to GumboPot
Perpetrating a fraud on the Court is direct contempt of court and is a crime.
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:45 pm to Y.A. Tittle
it really is crazy
it's like with the Mike Brown/BLM stuff. they are actively arguing for lowering due process protections against the civilian population
they're trying to justify using an unverified, partisan piece of opposition research paid for by the political opponent of the proposed target, and all the LEO have to do is swear the document exist (and leave out all the bad characteristics)
it's like with the Mike Brown/BLM stuff. they are actively arguing for lowering due process protections against the civilian population
they're trying to justify using an unverified, partisan piece of opposition research paid for by the political opponent of the proposed target, and all the LEO have to do is swear the document exist (and leave out all the bad characteristics)
Posted on 2/2/18 at 1:46 pm to GumboPot
Kind of like collusion then I guess.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News