- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Patrick Peterson non-interception vs. Quinn Sharp missed field goal: which call was worse?
Posted on 1/22/18 at 6:51 pm
Posted on 1/22/18 at 6:51 pm
Posted on 1/22/18 at 6:54 pm to karmew32
I was incensed at pp7 call.
I laughed at okie state.
You are right though.
I would have started j lee though.
I laughed at okie state.
You are right though.
I would have started j lee though.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 6:55 pm to karmew32
Bama ended up scoring on that drive. That play was a game changer
With that said, I would have preferred OSU won that game allowing us to play them.
With that said, I would have preferred OSU won that game allowing us to play them.
This post was edited on 1/22/18 at 6:56 pm
Posted on 1/22/18 at 7:06 pm to karmew32
There is nothing in that video that says to me he DEFINITELY made that kick.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 7:07 pm to karmew32
Pretty clear to me Peterson didn’t have 3 feet inbounds.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 7:08 pm to karmew32
The PP7 call was more outrageous knowing that they reviewed it and still got it wrong even with a clear divot in the ground where his foot was.
But i’m biased obviously.
But i’m biased obviously.
This post was edited on 1/22/18 at 7:58 pm
Posted on 1/22/18 at 7:28 pm to karmew32
I’m just saying that even the guys on fox nfl Sunday were talking about the PP no call. It would’ve been ruled a INT in the pros.
But the FG was a more important play.
But the FG was a more important play.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 7:38 pm to karmew32
Interception. Ritter might as well have lubed up, bent over, and let Nick penetrate him.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 8:10 pm to karmew32
The worse call is obviously the interception. I don't see anything conclusive about the kick being good or not.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 8:21 pm to karmew32
quote:
karmew32
Cry more LSU pussy
Posted on 1/22/18 at 8:23 pm to karmew32
My memory is fuzzy, but the PP INT didn't bug me that much, because it wasn't like we were moving the ball when we had it - much less scoring.
Allowing the INT just prolongs the inevitable.
Somebody correct me if I'm remembering this wrong.
Allowing the INT just prolongs the inevitable.
Somebody correct me if I'm remembering this wrong.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 8:40 pm to karmew32
the PP7 int was bad, but I've seen multiple worse reversals/non-reversals in the NFL this season alone.
Its not really comparable to the missed fg in question, because they made the right call on that one.
Its not really comparable to the missed fg in question, because they made the right call on that one.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 8:50 pm to karmew32
PP7 was not only an egregious call, but it was upheld on review on spite of clear and convincing evidence. It was Al Riveron level bad.
This post was edited on 1/22/18 at 8:50 pm
Posted on 1/24/18 at 7:29 am to karmew32
LSU fans intentionally ignore the fact that had Peterson's attempt been ruled an interception they still have to march down the field and score a TD to win the game.
While certainly possible, it was still more unlikely than not, given LSU's QB and the situation.
So even had they gotten the call, they still likely lose anyway.
While certainly possible, it was still more unlikely than not, given LSU's QB and the situation.
So even had they gotten the call, they still likely lose anyway.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News