Started By
Message

re: Let’s get this clear once and for all: the internet is NOT a utility

Posted on 12/15/17 at 1:57 pm to
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38352 posts
Posted on 12/15/17 at 1:57 pm to
Jesus, you can’t be this dense, dude.
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24633 posts
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:00 pm to
Leave the lord your god out of this karla
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38352 posts
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:01 pm to
Don’t you have a global warming meeting you’re late for?

ETA better than having Obama as my god!

How’s it feel knowing Trump wipes his arse everyday with your god’s legacy?
This post was edited on 12/15/17 at 2:03 pm
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24633 posts
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:03 pm to


Don't you have an online debate to lose where when you start spiraling you challenge everyone to produce their net worths and want to compare tax returns?

Tick tock slum lord
Posted by bonhoeffer45
Member since Jul 2016
4367 posts
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

As for discussing how a market can work sans the underlying traits...I would like for you to describe to us which markets currently operate as perfectly competitive markets?


As already stated, very few, but many come close. You see that in food and restaurant industries and a large majority of consumer goods. Few, if any of those markets meet the exact definition of perfectly competitive, but most come close, which is in part why we see it fit to minimally regulate them. Perfect Competition is a construct to understand what an ideal market looks like. Which is all that it was used for in the initial post. Despite the triggered people wanting to dumb down the post to more easily attack.

That is why the vast majority of the post was talking about how the ISP market fares with regards to the underlying characteristics that govern highly competitive markets. When markets severely lack those characteristics you increase the odds of certain types of market failures. Which we see in this space. A space that is often basically a natural monopoly or oligopoly and has been subject to an enormous amount of regulatory capture. Providing a good that is increasingly vital and requires use of numerous shared resources to operate.

The guiding premise of some detractors like Shorty has been that this market is not functionally unique in any notable way to require regulation like NN. That it has adequate competition and choice so it does not necessitate that sort of action. Which both ignores the actual facts of history that led to NN, but more importantly, doesn't align well with the facts. The facts neither you nor he have addressed in terms of the underlying market characteristics. If this market is not unique and thus deserving of a different economic calculus, you have failed to provide ANY convincing case so far. Because from where I am standing, based on the evidence I see, the ISP space is notably different from the vast majority of consumer goods and services.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83630 posts
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Don't you have an online debate to lose where when you start spiraling you challenge everyone to produce their net worths and want to compare tax returns?



or telling posters that he/she wishes their children will get their heads sawed off

#neverforget

Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37574 posts
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

Don’t you have a global warming meeting you’re late for?


She does but she's snowed in
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38352 posts
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:05 pm to
Nah. Just liberal Pitts like yourself that love Obama so much; but are secretly angry that everything he built is being destroyed by a Cheeto- stained reality tv star!



What time does your shift end at Chili’s man?
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24633 posts
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:05 pm to
Hes crying and downvoting now. Guess his little posse stopped backing him up.


REEEEEEE
Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37574 posts
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

w/o NN it will be charged based off consumption


Is that bad?
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24633 posts
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

What time does your shift end at Chili’s man?



Cuck translation - "REEEEEEEE"
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38352 posts
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

or telling posters that he/she wishes their children will get their heads sawed off


Is that what happens when you Knight so hard for Islam?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

As already stated, very few, but many come close. You see that in food and restaurant industries and a large majority of consumer goods. Few, if any of those markets meet the exact definition of perfectly competitive, but most come close, which is in part why we see it fit to minimally regulate them. Perfect Competition is a construct to understand what an ideal market looks like. Which is all that it was used for in the initial post. Despite the triggered people wanting to dumb down the post to more easily attack.




It is so transparent that the boards whining about this shite recognized their argument was tripping up on the competition element and had to come up with something.

Come on. Spill. 2 weeks ago, your responses to competition arguments ALL revolved around "but those aren't really competitors cause they're not the same duh duh duh"..............and demanding I prove they were the same. LOL

Now, suddenly, you discover your "let's talk about the construct around perfectly competitive markets as a framework".

:rotflmao:
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

Hes crying and downvoting now.
Why do people up or downvote?
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48672 posts
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

As already stated, very few, but many come close


Quantify "close". And quantify "severely lack". How many of the elements listed must be met to meet your definitions. Then I'll be happy to discuss the details. I find it more productive to get the parameters out of the way before diving into the details. Not that you would ever do this, but some of the less honest posters tend to change their argument midstream.
Posted by Freder
Member since Aug 2014
809 posts
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

Jesus, you can’t be this dense, dude.


I’m just trying to understand your logic
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38352 posts
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

I’m just trying to understand your logic


If you cannot understand how gas is considered a utility; logic won’t help.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

Quantify "close". And quantify "severely lack". How many of the elements listed must be met to meet your definitions.


Bless your heart. Good luck.

quote:

Not that you would ever do this, but some of the less honest posters tend to change their argument midstream.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83630 posts
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Is that what happens when you Knight so hard for Islam?


apparently it is what happens when you ask if Trump had reviewed the vetting processes because you actually agreed with it

Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48672 posts
Posted on 12/15/17 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

I’m just trying to understand your logic


Nah. I don't have a dog in that hunt, but you are being obtuse. Intentionally. If you aren't, then you are as dense as the other poster indicated.
Jump to page
Page First 12 13 14 15 16 ... 19
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 14 of 19Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram