- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How did they justify the Steinle verdict?
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:55 pm
How in the world did they end up not guilty??
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:56 pm to pwejr88
Jury nullification.
It's an FU to Trump. That's all.
Similar to O.J.
It's an FU to Trump. That's all.
Similar to O.J.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:56 pm to pwejr88
Not guilty of murder but guilty of involuntary manslaughter
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:56 pm to pwejr88
They already justified it. It's Trump's fault! Because it's FU California. No other justification needed, in their eyes.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:57 pm to pwejr88
The new words to people should be “don’t go to California because they don’t care about your safety“.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:57 pm to pwejr88
Mind blowing , sickening. frick that jury.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:57 pm to pwejr88
Smoke, mirrors, and stupidity
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:58 pm to pwejr88
The jury was stacked with a bunch of people named ghanesh patel and chi xi wu.
They chose to use their position to virtue signal about immigration rather than bring justice to a 5 time deported cretin.
They chose to use their position to virtue signal about immigration rather than bring justice to a 5 time deported cretin.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:58 pm to pwejr88
People have an unnatural and evil hatred of Trump. Its incredible.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:59 pm to pwejr88
Her family should sue the ever living frick out of the city. They released the fricker instead of turning him into ICE and he goes off and kills someone?
frick that. Sue the city dry
frick that. Sue the city dry
Posted on 11/30/17 at 9:01 pm to pwejr88
Get the gringa.
What a victory for the left! gutter trash gets away with it
They would like him to be able tovote.
What a victory for the left! gutter trash gets away with it
They would like him to be able tovote.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 9:01 pm to pwejr88
I've had some great times in Cali, mostly SoCal, but I think it may be time to trigger the San Andreas and kiss those morons goodbye.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 9:02 pm to pwejr88
The public defense Attorney for the Illegal Alien called out Trump in an interview with the media after the verdict & called it a vindication for immigrants. It was complete & utter arrogance to the 3rd degree & this guy should be beaten severely. If I am Kate's family I am going out for blood. If they don't they are better people than I am.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 9:22 pm to pwejr88
quote:
How did they justify the Steinle verdict?
It's a "technicality"...her losing her wonderful life at 33 years...is a technicality of legal concept. Too bad for her...good luck for the illegal criminal alien murderer. San Francisco!...WOOT!!
*Dumb pigs*
Posted on 11/30/17 at 9:25 pm to pwejr88
How?? Maybe by being in the courtroom and listening to the testimony. Whadda ya think?
Posted on 11/30/17 at 10:03 pm to pwejr88
Simple. The science said that it was an accident. This should have never gone to trial. The bullet hit the ground and bounced up.
Gun accidents happen all of the time. Remember when Chaney shot that guy. He didn't have a trial because it was an accident
Gun accidents happen all of the time. Remember when Chaney shot that guy. He didn't have a trial because it was an accident
Posted on 11/30/17 at 10:07 pm to pwejr88
quote:
How did they justify the Steinle verdict?
Evidence was presented in court that the bullet had ricocheted before hitting Steinle
Posted on 11/30/17 at 10:40 pm to pwejr88
They tried to charge for too much. They would have been able to nail him for manslaughter.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 11:24 pm to pwejr88
it was an idiotic prosecutors fault.
The jury was to decide between Murder 1 and involuntary manslaughter.
California (no surprise here) has some bizarrely fricked up laws.
The following quote is not my opinion, it is from California Code and Findlaw:
if my understanding of the law in California is correct, and the Prosecutor chose to give the jury murder 1 or involuntary manslaughter then that prosecutor is a fricking retard and deserves all of the hatred and blame, and I wouldn't bat an eye if he dies. He basically picked two charges that require intent for a case that had a defendant with an easily provable lack of intent.
The problem is murder 1 requires malice and intent. A good defense attorney can get him out of murder 1. Involuntary manslaughter in California can be taken off the table if the defendant can show "a lack of knowledge or reasonable mistake" however I find it unbelievable that that stupid fricking jury all agreed that firing a gun into a crowded pier is a reasonable mistake or you lack the knowledge that firing a gun into a crowd can kill someone.
The jury was to decide between Murder 1 and involuntary manslaughter.
California (no surprise here) has some bizarrely fricked up laws.
The following quote is not my opinion, it is from California Code and Findlaw:
quote:
quote:
In California, Homicide during the commission of a felony often results in a murder charge rather than a manslaughter charge. Murder 1 requires intent and malice.
When a killing occurred during the commission of a crime that is not a felony, the prosecutor must prove that the defendant had a criminal intent to commit the underlying unlawful act. If the defendant did not intend to engage in the crime that resulted in homicide, the state may be unable to prove involuntary manslaughter. The defendant may be able to establish a lack of intent by showing a reasonable mistake or lack of knowledge.
if my understanding of the law in California is correct, and the Prosecutor chose to give the jury murder 1 or involuntary manslaughter then that prosecutor is a fricking retard and deserves all of the hatred and blame, and I wouldn't bat an eye if he dies. He basically picked two charges that require intent for a case that had a defendant with an easily provable lack of intent.
The problem is murder 1 requires malice and intent. A good defense attorney can get him out of murder 1. Involuntary manslaughter in California can be taken off the table if the defendant can show "a lack of knowledge or reasonable mistake" however I find it unbelievable that that stupid fricking jury all agreed that firing a gun into a crowded pier is a reasonable mistake or you lack the knowledge that firing a gun into a crowd can kill someone.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News