Matt Canada's offense is 10th in the SEC

remember when a majority of this board thought we'd finish 3-9

Ugh.


I hate us sometimes

A 37-7 loss will frick up any differential. Thanks Etling.

quote:

---

How do you expect to compete in the West when you're being outscored by every other team?

---

Well with the fact that we'll finish 4-4 at worst and 6-2 at best with the latter being the more likely outcome, I'd say OP is a little bitch

Great. It could be 14th. Remember that Coach O called one game so the Troy game is not on Canada.

Well, 3 teams in the W rank higher in Scoring Offense but at the same time have losses to us. 2 have wins over us.

I would say your metric, ranking as far as scoring offense, as far as "competitiveness" is not a good metric to determine that.

If it was a good metric we would be, frankly, last in the W.

We are in the upper 50% in West standings while at the same time in the lower 50% in the West ppg. While not contrarian, it is a far cry from being indicative.

In fact, this means that our D is faring better, on the average, against SEC opponents that most perceive. Fact of the matter only two SECW teams have a better scoring defense than us. Those are our only two conf losses. So it can be inferred that we are indeed winning conf games on the back of our defense.

That and our wins have been closer in point differential than our losses. Which is the real point, despite all my bullshite above.

quote:

---

How do you expect to compete in the West when you're being outscored by every other team?

---

Mizzou is averaging almost 38 ppg. Maybe you'd like to go cheer for them instead.

Our QB is Danny Etling. The offense is built around his skill set, which is very limited. It’s not rocket science

I'm willing to see how he does in year 2. A year in his system and a QB who isn't Danny Etling.