Started By
Message

Why would any parent push their child to play RB?

Posted on 9/20/17 at 11:42 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
432038 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 11:42 am
i meant to maek this thread a few weeks ago and just posted this question in another thread, but it's legit

RBs are abundant and have very short pro careers

almost no RBs get that major contract (Lev Bell's holdout is what made me think of this thread)

if you're athletic enough to play RB, then you can play LB, DB, WR, or DE (depending on your frame, but you have a ton of options). each of these positions not only allows a better chance to a pro career (as there are multiple of each position starting on every team), but you also drastically increase the money to be made

*ETA: RB has the 3rd lowest franchise tag cost (ahead of S and TE) of any outfield player in the NFL
This post was edited on 9/20/17 at 11:44 am
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
113094 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 11:45 am to
It's probably more from the coaches than the parents.


And i don't think it's as much of a given that you would be an elite defender because you were an elite RB.
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
38536 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 11:45 am to
The parents don't always have a say-so, and a lot of running backs were raised by a mom or grandma that doesn't take into account things like earnings per position.

The best athletes play QB or RB in youth sports, the culture of winning at that level is long and deep rooted. "Hey, this kid can fly, let's put him at corner and totally negate him from any action"

You don't see youth coaches with that mindset

And despite the knowledge that a kid can make more money if he's a good corner, kids still want the glory. Running backs get to score touchdowns and get their name in the paper
This post was edited on 9/20/17 at 11:48 am
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
26046 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 11:50 am to
I doubt parents have much to do with it, but most coaches (and parents) aren't thinking about pro development when their kids are in 6th grade.
Posted by Master of Sinanju
Member since Feb 2012
11491 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 11:56 am to
Up until college, a lot of these guys are playing on both sides of the ball and on these lower levels you put you stud at QB or RB.

Once they are being recruited, a lot of these players don't want to give up the ball. They see it as a demotion to play LB.
This post was edited on 9/20/17 at 11:57 am
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
60838 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 12:04 pm to
It's the star position in 99.9% of offenses before college. QB isn't anywhere close to as important pre-high school. Once they get to a higher level of play, they don't want to give up that star role they've had their entire lives. We see it all the time. Trying to explain to parents/kids they would be much more likely to get a scholarship at safety or CB than RB. There are just so many RBs out there, but fewer true D1 CBs.
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
23836 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 12:12 pm to
If this was true everyone that isn't a 5 star or high 4 star RB would do it by college
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42817 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 12:18 pm to
That's like saying a coaching job in the SEC is bad. Even Vandy and Kentucky pay millions of dollars. If you can play RB and make some cash, do it. It beats working in a factory.
Posted by TROLA
BATON ROUGE
Member since Apr 2004
12991 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 12:46 pm to
How many of these kids switch to RB after the potential of playing at a higher level is displayed? Not many I'd presume, as youth coaches into High School are going to put their best athletes at the positions that garners the most opportunity to win.. RB/QB are those positions in youth football. Id be willing to bet that most WR's played RB at some point in lower levels only to move to the WR once their full size was realized and or the team had a better RB.
Posted by BowlJackson
Birmingham, AL
Member since Sep 2013
52881 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

if you're athletic enough to play RB, then you can play LB, DB, WR, or DE


A) RB gets more glory than any of those positions. Some people care about that.

B) just because you can play RB, doesn't mean you can play those positions. Not every RB has the hands to play WR, or the hips to play DB, can hit like a LB, or moves to play DE. And a lot of guys that play offense just don't have the same mind set that defensive guys play, you need a mean streak and to love to hit people.
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
158134 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

S and TE


Joxy scrambling mf'er

But i think some of it has to do with the glamour of the position. Young S, for instance, thought it was cool as shite to pretend to be Emmitt or Barry Sanders in his front yard, but once i got to jr high i had tWant to be Deion. Some parents probably don't mind thinking of their chirrens as the next great rb, or realizing they are bound to at least enjoy themselves based on how much action they'll get since not many youth teams are out there slingin it.
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
15775 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 1:08 pm to
I understand the point, but RB is the glory position. I remember playing youth football, no one would care that I had 5 pancakes and 5 tackles while playing both sides. But my rb friend, everyone would be in love with him because he scored three touchdowns. That is just the matter of the game.

If we are being honest. About 95% of football players want to play the offensive skill positions. Eventually most give that dream up. (Lineman realize they're too fat, DB's realize they can't catch and don't like getting hit, and LB's realize they have absolutely 0 vision.)

Usually by college this sort of thing weeds itself out. Everyone who is not in their best position will usually end up changing. But, that is not always the case.
Posted by theducks
Where The Blazers Play
Member since Aug 2013
13845 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 1:10 pm to
Start at RB or ride the bench at WR.

Which is more appealing
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34629 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 1:38 pm to
With all due respect, I think you lawyers sometimes get caught up in everything being 100% about money

This post was edited on 9/20/17 at 1:43 pm
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
113094 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 1:54 pm to
Yo Jake, your O thread on the rant is getting posts whacked like crazy
Posted by brg0320
Member since May 2009
3295 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 5:27 pm to
With everyone on this board complaining about how boring football has gotten, can you imagine if we started playing the most athletic skill kids at every other position and the least athletic at RB?

Let's talk about how boring that would be
Posted by tigeroarz1
Winston-Salem, NC
Member since Oct 2013
3492 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 5:42 pm to
Gimme the ball, gimme the ball! RB is the rudimentary offensive position in football.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 9/20/17 at 6:37 pm to
Cant throw well.
Cant catch.
Has terrible hand eye coordination.
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
19001 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 12:05 am to
What other positions can someone 5'10 220 lbs play?
Posted by offshoretrash
Farmerville, La
Member since Aug 2008
10259 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 3:30 am to
Reggie Bush made decent money in the NFL but I've wondered how good of a cb he could have been with his size and speed.

I would never encourage my kids to play rb, neither are rb size anyway.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram