Started By
Message

Beauty and the Beast Disney Agenda

Posted on 3/3/17 at 8:55 am
Posted by Columbia
Land of the Yuppies
Member since Mar 2016
3138 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 8:55 am
I'm curious to hear grown up discussion on this. Disney has decided to add a Gay influence in their recent adaptation of the the Beauty and the Beast classic. I was planning on taking my girls to see this, but I'm not for pushing this type of agenda on our children. My views and beliefs are considered outdated these days, but curious to hear others opinions.


Disney Agenda
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27104 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:01 am to
I'm not bothered by what I am sure is several seconds of a scene that will in all likelihood be forgotten about.

This same "outrage" came up in How to Train your Dragon 2 and it turned out to be nothing.
This post was edited on 3/3/17 at 9:11 am
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:01 am to
You will no doubt be shamed on here as being backwards, but this addition is unnecessary like most of the token gay characters we are beginning to see on commercials and tv. There's no point other than giving a tip of the cap to the "gay community". It serves no purpose to include this stuff in movies targeting children.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84041 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:02 am to
Younger children (3-6) that haven't reached the age of reason are really impressionable, don't know the consequences of their actions, and will copy things they see. Or just be completely confused. If your child can reason (generally ages 7 and up), then you can explain what happened and why.

I personally don't care for children's movies pushing specific social agendas but that's where we are in society.
This post was edited on 3/3/17 at 9:03 am
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
47946 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:04 am to
quote:

add a Gay influence


Anyone that has seen the original knows this is not an add.
Posted by Burt Reynolds
Monterey, CA
Member since Jul 2008
22443 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:04 am to
This movie is a complete cash grab and embarrassment to Disney. It is the exact same movie as the cartoon. Same songs and characters. Just like Jungle Book, they are cashing in on the naivety of this generation's youth.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83686 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:08 am to
LINK

this is utterly gay as frick, but no "in your face" gay "agenda" or whatever

this, like most of the Disney gay stuff, a complete overreaction
Posted by gatorhata9
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2010
26177 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:10 am to
quote:

I'm curious to hear grown up discussion on this.


Who gives a flying frick?

quote:

I was planning on taking my girls to see this, but I'm not for pushing this type of agenda on our children


How about you wait and see if it's really as bad as you think


Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
51875 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:11 am to
quote:

. I was planning on taking my girls to see this, but I'm not for pushing this type of agenda on our children.
that it's ok to be gay?
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
47946 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:12 am to
quote:

I was planning on taking my girls to see this, but I'm not for pushing this type of agenda on our children


I think you can go in fairly confident that they have no plans to show any actual sodomy taking place.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56701 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:18 am to
I wasn't going to see it anyway, so it's not out of my way not to see it now. I never even saw the cartoon.

It's not about inclusion, though, imo. When you cater to such a small segment of the populace, there is definitely an agenda, and since Hollywood's gay percentage is sky high, I'd say that agenda is just typical outlier self-normalization. Since it's Disnaey, I look forward to their forthcoming pedo normalization.
Posted by nes2010
Member since Jun 2014
6795 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:27 am to
Two pages and no one has accused you of being a closeted homosexual yet. I'm pleasantly surprised.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:39 am to
Your kids probably wouldn't care unless you made a big deal about it. But I respect your choice to parent how you see best.


My daughter can't wait to see it. She has a friend in school who was adopted by a lesbian couple. It's no big deal to her, and we've never made it one. Just told her sometime 2 women or 2 men love each other. She's 10.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
110008 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 9:45 am to
Jesus Christ, what do you think Elsa's song was about: Let It Go

That's jump off the page gay. Disney has always had gay characters, and the one they're just coming out and saying is was always suspected to be among them. I think your daughters can handle LeFou just having a huge man crush on Gaston.

If you've let them watch "The Hunchback of Notre Dame", where the villain's musical number is about him justifying raping and murdering a girl, then they should be able to see this.
Posted by SpqrTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2004
9290 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 10:02 am to
I don't doubt that there is a movement among content creators to normalize homosexuality on our screens. You can see it in commercials, TV, movies. It's all pretty obvious. I find it more irritating than offensive, because I seem to encounter gay people on screen more than I actually do in real life.

In this case, the instance seems so short and inconsequential to the plot that I really won't give it much thought or care when I see it.

I'll just remain irritated by the "token" presence of homosexuality in the movie. As I've said many times on this board, "token" diversity is not diversity. When it's not plot-essential, it's just pandering. And that should be irritating to everyone. If you really care about advancing the cause of homosexuality, lobby for a real story about people who are homosexual from Disney. Don't be satisfied by a gay kiss in a throwaway scene, or innuendo. If homosexuality is your cause, then promote it for real. Lefou being "gay" in Beauty in the Beast isn't a win. It's just an odd inclusion. If that makes some people happy, fine. But it seems pretty cheap to me.

TLDR version: If you're going to start a movement, start it for real, or shut the frick up. Either way, I'll be irritated by you, but at least I will respect you. Bother me when Ariel is openly gay, not when Lefou is gay.
Posted by DayBowBow
Member since Jun 2011
5049 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 10:02 am to
Something tells me that if they would have just released the movie without saying "pay attention we put a gay scene in there" most people would never notice it.

If you don't have to explain away the fact that it's essentially a movie about kidnapping and bestiality then I doubt your children will ask about LeFou making goo-goo eyes at Gaston or telling him he loves him when he dies.
Posted by TexasTiger1185
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2011
13074 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 10:29 am to
Them having a couple guys kiss is not an agenda. It is reality, there are homosexuals all around you and your children.
Posted by Speedy G
Member since Aug 2013
3911 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 10:30 am to
What are you scared of? There are many gay people in the world. Why do you feel the need to hide that from your children?
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 12:55 pm to
As someone else said in another thread, people are not worried about the overly obvious beastiality but gay makes them mad.
Posted by Indfanfromcol
LSU
Member since Jan 2011
14741 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

I was planning on taking my girls to see this, but I'm not for pushing this type of agenda on our children.



I wonder if this is how people acted after integration happened in the 50s?

Having some type of gay influence in any movie shouldn't be taboo at this point. Why does it need to be an agenda? Why not make a positive spin and say that you should be respectful of people's decisions even if you don't agree with them?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram