- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will current owners of assault rifles be grandfathered in if they are banned?
Posted on 6/15/16 at 10:05 am to Rover Range
Posted on 6/15/16 at 10:05 am to Rover Range
quote:
Do like i did.. Buy a Saiga 12 gauge with a 20 round drum mag from a random mechanic in Louisiana with absolutely no paper trail..
Then take it out on a boat, have a boating accident, lose the gun.
But then don't come and post about it on a public forum, because then the evidence of your plan will be easily found.
0
Posted on 6/15/16 at 10:05 am to Brazos
I lost mine in a boating accident last week...
Posted on 6/15/16 at 10:10 am to Brazos
If Elizabeth Warren gets her way they will come and take them, but that isn't likely to happen yet. If you get one, stock up on ammo. I think it is more likely that they tax ammo to the point of being ridiculous expensive before they show up to take it away. It's how the government handles things they don't like, see cigarettes.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 10:13 am to Ash Williams
quote:
What's an "assault rifle?"
A scary looking black gun
Posted on 6/15/16 at 10:19 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
You been to the doctor lately?
Why in the world would anyone answer anything other "Sorry Doc, no clue what you're talking about... what's a gun?"
Posted on 6/15/16 at 10:20 am to fillmoregandt
quote:
A scary looking black gun
ah
so something like this would be banned then?
Posted on 6/15/16 at 10:35 am to ithad2bme
quote:
s of assault rifles be grandfathered in if they are banned?
If Elizabeth Warren gets her way they will come and take them, but that isn't likely to happen yet. If you get one, stock up on ammo. I think it is more likely that they tax ammo to the point of being ridiculous expensive before they show up to take it away. It's how the government handles things they don't like, see cigarettes.
this.... they will over tax or ban actual ammo - ammo is not protected under 2nd amendment
Posted on 6/15/16 at 10:36 am to Clames
quote:
They will have to grandfather in existing stocks
why would they have to do this?
Posted on 6/15/16 at 10:41 am to choupiquesushi
The Gov didnt do so back in Clinton days. Not taking anything away from current owners. Never will. But they will make buying new things harder, very expensive, and damn near impossible. Taxing firearms and ammo, making paper work on handing down firearms, etc. Over time no one will have the stock pile they once had.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 10:47 am to Ash Williams
quote:
What's an "assault rifle?"
Posted on 6/15/16 at 10:55 am to Brazos
I have a DR15 platform based rifle.... DR = Defense Rifle 
Posted on 6/15/16 at 10:55 am to YouAre8Up
quote:
What's an "assault rifle?"
[/URL][/img]Posted on 6/15/16 at 10:56 am to YouAre8Up
what makes that an assault rifle and not the rifle i posted above?
Posted on 6/15/16 at 10:59 am to Brazos
They're not banning anything. Just the typical bullshite attempts.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 10:59 am to choupiquesushi
quote:
arms
noun
arms plural noun: 1. weapons and ammunition; armaments
Yes ammunition is protected by the 2nd amendment. as shown the definition of arms is "weapons and ammunition.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 11:46 am to choupiquesushi
quote:
ammo is not protected under 2nd amendment
Please explain why you think this is a true statement. One that's been debunked on this board more than a few times recently.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 11:58 am to choupiquesushi
quote:
ammo is not protected under 2nd amendment
wrong
Posted on 6/15/16 at 12:04 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:quote:
They will have to grandfather in existing stocks
why would they have to do this?
Because confiscation would be a bloodbath the likes of which this country has not seen since the 1860's.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 12:13 pm to Crawdaddy
quote:
But they will make buying new things harder, very expensive, and damn near impossible. Taxing firearms and ammo, making paper work on handing down firearms, etc. Over time no one will have the stock pile they once had.
Correct.
Posted on 6/15/16 at 12:22 pm to Darth_Vader
I think 7 is a fine age to start shooting, but the thought of your daughter telling her first grade classmates how santa's elves built her a real gun is just funny to me. 
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News