Started By
Message

re: Jones' Ejection Hit

Posted on 9/21/15 at 9:54 am to
Posted by TenTex
Member since Jan 2008
15949 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 9:54 am to
Because of the data indicating how many football players are having brain issues later in life I believe it might be time to remove hitting as part of the game. The purpose of a defense is to stop the advancement of the football. Sound tackling works well stopping advancement of the football. Football fans now applaud the violence associated with hard hitting. It might be time to eliminate hard hitting for health and safety reasons.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83695 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Nkemdiche's hit on Bama's QB looked much worse that Jones' hit FWIW


only because Bama's QB was running

and the Ole Miss player never left his feet
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67601 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 9:55 am to
quote:

textbook ejection material under the new rules.


suck
Posted by Duckie
Tippy Toe, Louisiana
Member since Apr 2010
24314 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:03 am to
quote:

Tight call. But it was a fair call.


and not a smart play by him when we are up by so much.
Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
54282 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:04 am to
quote:

I just didnt think it was a hit worthy of an ejection.


Most definitely was worthy. He launched towards the head. No brainer.
Posted by guedeaux
Tardis
Member since Jan 2008
13625 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:05 am to
quote:

Left his feet


not really





quote:

made contact above the neck


barely.

I think this hit should be used to show the errors inherent in the targeting rule.
Posted by white_mj
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
460 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:06 am to
quote:

quote:
Left his feet


not really



^This.....to me it looked as though he was just running through the QB not "launching" into the other players head.

Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
54282 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Launch—a player leaving his feet to attack an opponent by an upward and forward thrust of the body to make contact in the head or neck area



The term barely is not in the rules. It was targeting.

Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:07 am to
quote:

under the new rules.


quote:

suck


Disagree. We have learned a LOT more about concussions and their cumulative effects. It is good to protect from head shots in this type of circumstance.

AU had a player that was ejected in the game before the LSU one (1st half, so could play against LSU)

It was the one that hit Jeter and knocked the wind out of him.

As Gary said...the defender learned his lesson, put a huge hit on the receiver, but the "injury" was breath knocked out...not concussion.


It is fair and it is taught. Jones will learn that next time, he'll drop lower and hit the QB in the sternum and not the head.

It wasn't malicious. But, it was the correct call. I don't need to see college kids getting hit in the head to be entertained.

Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
67138 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:09 am to
quote:

It was targeting.


100% of the time.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:10 am to
Right call

Bad rule
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67601 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:11 am to
quote:

We have learned a LOT more about concussions and their cumulative effects.


Do you stand a better chance of getting knocked out/concussion hitting a player up high or by a knee or thigh to the head?

quote:

AU had a player that was ejected in the game before the LSU one (1st half, so could play against LSU) It was the one that hit Jeter and knocked the wind out of him. As Gary said...the defender learned his lesson, put a huge hit on the receiver, but the "injury" was breath knocked out...not concussion.


so he was ejected the week before and still targeted the following week? he didn't learn shite b/c that hit was illegal under the new rules also...hitting a defenseless player

Posted by SaintInBham
Birmingham
Member since Sep 2015
859 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:11 am to
It's the result of the QB and all the linemen can cross the line of scrimmage before the throw play.

It's the right call by the rules, but I'm convinced that's what you're going to see come out of that play.
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
62427 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:13 am to
quote:

Right call. It was worth it imo


The problem I have with the rule is that the qb was out of the pocket and running towards the line of scrimmage. This same qb already had a 65 yard td run, had already stayed on his feet and completed a pass even though a safety had him completely wrapped up and was pulling on him. Later in the game the qb was allowed to flip a pass to the endzone after having 99% of his body across the line of scrimmage. Any one ever seen a qb pump fake a pass before? How is the defense supposed to commit to the tackle and then pull up a split second after the ball is released?

I'm sure by the rule, it was the correct call. But it's a terrible rule for defensive players.

Posted by Will2nd
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2009
3948 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:14 am to
quote:

He left his feet and had time to pull off the hit after the ball was thrown.


It was a bang-bang play. He never left his feet. The targeting had more to do with hitting high than anything else, IMO.
This post was edited on 9/21/15 at 10:16 am
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
33974 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:15 am to
quote:

I still am having trouble seeing this as "Targeting"


It was a hit to the head. Easy call.
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11283 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:16 am to
call was correct but the rule is dumb, should not be an ejection or suspension. 15 yards max.
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
33974 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:16 am to
quote:

no way that should be worth an ejection. 15 yards maybe.


I disagree. This kind of rule might save football as we know it.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:17 am to
quote:

Do you stand a better chance of getting knocked out/concussion hitting a player up high or by a knee or thigh to the head?


The one getting HIT

quote:

so he was ejected the week before and still targeted the following week? h




He did NOT "target" the LSU receiver. THAT was the point. He hit the LSU tight end exactly as he should...INSTEAD of the head.

It was a perfect example of
learning his lesson"
This post was edited on 9/21/15 at 10:18 am
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
33974 posts
Posted on 9/21/15 at 10:21 am to
quote:

The problem I have with the rule is that the qb was out of the pocket and running towards the line of scrimmage. This same qb already had a 65 yard td run, had already stayed on his feet and completed a pass even though a safety had him completely wrapped up and was pulling on him. Later in the game the qb was allowed to flip a pass to the endzone after having 99% of his body across the line of scrimmage. Any one ever seen a qb pump fake a pass before? How is the defense supposed to commit to the tackle and then pull up a split second after the ball is released?


Why the hell was Deion Jones trying to knock the crap out of him instead of tackling him?

As another poster said, a lot of the "dangerous" plays could be cleaned up with fundamental tackling.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram