Started By
Message

How would an NFL team in London even work?

Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:08 am
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
22486 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:08 am
Would they play the first 8 games on the road all in the US and then the last 8 in London, and have a facility in the US?

Or would they have a normal schedule, and just basically be guaranteed to never be good due to travel constraints?
Posted by lsusportsman2
Member since Oct 2007
27232 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:09 am to
Another stupid fricking suggestion by Roger Goodell the genius. This would never ever work.
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
65876 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:13 am to
Absolutely terrible idea.

When going to the West coast they'd be on a plane for 10-12 hours.
Posted by PAGator
Member since Jul 2015
2339 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:14 am to
I honestly don't think anyone wants this. The British really don't care. Americans don't want it. It's just one of the "Longhorn Network" fallacies- just because you have a bunch of people without a product, doesn't mean people will buy that product once you introduce it to them
Posted by O
Mandeville
Member since Oct 2011
6471 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:14 am to
quote:

How would an NFL team in London even work?


It wouldn't.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166500 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:15 am to
does sitting on a plane an extra 3-4 hrs 8 times a year really make that big of a difference?

for any other team, its a max once a year travel exception, east coast teams really ain't very much further than Seattle flying to miami.
Posted by KindaRaw
Member since Jun 2014
3963 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:21 am to
Shite like this is why Roger needs to step down. Guy is such an imbecile.
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27104 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:21 am to
The only way I could see this working is that they would need some United States base of football operations and travel to London on Friday I suppose.

It's a stupid idea all around.
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:22 am to
They have to give us a couple of Premiership Rugby teams in exchange.
Posted by SwaggerCopter
H TINE HOL IT DINE
Member since Dec 2012
27232 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:30 am to
Now that Tottenham Hotspur is linked with the NFL, I am becoming more open to the idea. I'm not sure we'd get the team though, as we tend to have a lot of Sunday Premier League games due to Europa League on Thursdays.
Posted by bigpetedatiga
Alexandria, LA
Member since Aug 2009
8628 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:31 am to
It would work horribly!

You don't seem them trying to be a soccer team across the globe!

Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40191 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:32 am to
quote:

How would an NFL team in London even work?
Would they play the first 8 games on the road all in the US and then the last 8 in London, and have a facility in the US?

Or would they have a normal schedule, and just basically be guaranteed to never be good due to travel constraints?


Really are you too dense to figure it out? All you have to do is build a practice center that is big enough for 2 teams or build 2 practice centers or work out a deal with one of the many pro soccer teams and use their facilites for the visiting team. Have a visting team play an east coast team and then play to London after that game. Spend the week and practice in London and then fly home. It should not be a major problem unless it is a west coast team in which case you let them play on monday night the following week so they have an extra day to get over jet lag. The flight from Miami to Seattle is 7 hours. London to any east coast city is 8-9hrs and london to dallas is 10 hours and London to Chicago is 9 hours and these are flights on charter jets its not like they are flying Spirit or anything.


Then keep up the US practice facility of the relocating team and schedule 2-3 week road trips when they play in the US.
Posted by Palm Beach Tiger
Orlando, Florida
Member since Jan 2007
29872 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:49 am to
I personally do not think it would be as bad as people on here are saying. Its a 6 hour flight to the northeast. The games would sell out. And london is a world mega city that would be getting a shiny new toy. The endorsement deals alone should attract big stars that have any brains.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162258 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:51 am to
quote:

Would they play the first 8 games on the road all in the US and then the last 8 in London, and have a facility in the US?


That would make the most sense

But you could argue they'd have a significant home field advantage.

Only way I could see it working would be they play 8 games in the U.S. (and would have to have a facility here), have a bye week after week 8 and return to London.

To make it fair to the other teams they would only play there after their own bye week on a Friday or Saturday to give them ample time to return home.

Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85137 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:51 am to
I think Montreal, Toronto, or Calgary will get a team before London, despite no evidence that the NFL is leaning that direction.

I know Canada has the CFL, but I liken Canada getting an NFL team to the US getting an English Premiere League team - people would flock to the superior product.
This post was edited on 9/16/15 at 11:57 am
Posted by Dr. Jones
Member since Jun 2013
160 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:53 am to
London? No shot. Canada? Maybe.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111147 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 11:57 am to
I hope it happens.

Whether it works or fails horribly, it'll be great to watch.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64379 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 12:12 pm to
I posted in one of these threads one time that you'd almost need a full division to really make it work logistically although I think that would be pretty stupid. You'd need 3 regional all inclusive training facilities in US and 1 or 2 in Europe for travelling teams.

-3 away games for euro teams would be in Europe, this would then require only 5 more games in America which could be done in two 2 game trips and other trip.
-the cross conference and cross division opponents could play their 2 euro away games back to back and be done.
-the other 2 same placing conference teams would be the other two teams with the potential of travel.

TLDR Basically the European teams would get 11/16 games in Europe between their home and the other 3 European teams and the American teams going there could knock out their 2 away games against the European teams in one stretch.

Posted by brgfather129
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Jul 2009
17108 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 12:12 pm to
Is this the thread where all the logistics experts who can't figure out how to pick up Johnny from karate AND Billy from soccer practice give us the inside scoop on the issues with NFL international expansion?
This post was edited on 9/16/15 at 12:13 pm
Posted by shawnlsu
Member since Nov 2011
23682 posts
Posted on 9/16/15 at 1:29 pm to
This is where the Saints will end up. London > L.A.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram