Started By
Message
locked post

public ban on the use of tobacco

Posted on 7/9/14 at 11:43 am
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 11:43 am
This was mentioned in the drug legalization thread, but I think its worth of its own discussion.

Currently, we severely curtail the use of alcohol publicly. There are limits to where you can drink and how much. In CO, you cannot publicly consume cannabis.

What about a partial ban of smoking outside of your personal property? No smoking in parks (drinking beer in parks is illegal where i live but not enforced), no smoking in front of door entrances (like california), no smoking on gov't grounds, no smoking on patios of bars. We could have designated smoking areas in clusters of businesses.

Personally I would love this from not having to deal with the smoke but its really anti-freedom IMHO.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 11:45 am to
it is anti freedom

it is unconstitutional in terms of forcing private enterprises to comply
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 11:46 am to
Lots of major cities have gone this route (including prohibitions at indoor public establishments) and I support it whole-heartedly. I remember the days of going out on the weekend and coming home smelling like smoke. Don't miss them.

I believe the last 5 hotels I stayed in were 100% smoke free.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 11:46 am to
frick that.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 11:50 am to
I used to smoke cigarettes, and still have one every now and then, and they absolutely should be cutailed in public use. They're nasty, but they sure can be delicious sometimes.
Posted by UGATiger26
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2009
9055 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 11:51 am to
No problem at all with indoor smoking bans in public buildings.

On private property, I agree that smoking should be banned indoors, but that's personal preference.
Should be up to the discretion of the business owner. If people don't like that smoking is allowed indoors, then they can take their business elsewhere.

Outdoor smoking bans are dumb, and are really just symbolic gestures that say "We care about health, and don't like smoking. Yay!"

People who toss their butts on the ground should get cited for littering though.
This post was edited on 7/9/14 at 11:55 am
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36129 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 11:52 am to
quote:

No smoking in parks


quote:


Personally I would love this from not having to deal with the smoke


The obvious compromise is to designate certain areas of a park to allow smoking.

The smoking lobby isn't interesting compromise, though, and it means 20 years from now tobacco will basically be non-existent in public.
This post was edited on 7/9/14 at 11:53 am
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54257 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 11:54 am to
Thought there for a minute you were talking about all tobacco. My snuff lip was starting to quiver.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
127204 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 11:55 am to
quote:

No smoking in parks (drinking beer in parks is illegal where i live but not enforced), no smoking in front of door entrances (like california), no smoking on gov't grounds, no smoking on patios of bars. We could have designated smoking areas in clusters of businesses.
Support.
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27250 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

What about a partial ban of smoking outside of your personal property? No smoking in parks (drinking beer in parks is illegal where i live but not enforced), no smoking in front of door entrances (like california), no smoking on gov't grounds, no smoking on patios of bars. We could have designated smoking areas in clusters of businesses.



This is already happening. There is a complete smoking ban on the Ole Miss campus (including the outside)
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
7450 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 12:07 pm to
I smoke but rarely in public and never in front of kids. Really the only time I smoke in public is outside a bar where others are smoking. I dont have a problem with any of the bans except on personal property.
This post was edited on 7/9/14 at 12:11 pm
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112749 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 12:09 pm to
Just an FYI... when the Superdome first opened in New Orleans back in the 70s they allowed smoking even though it was indoors. By the second half you cook look up at the roof and see huge clouds of cigarette smoke.

During that same era I also went to baseball games at the Astrodome and did not notice any smog in the air. Don't know if they banned cigarettes from the beginning or maybe they had a better ventilation system.
Posted by GoBigOrange86
Meine sich're Zuflucht
Member since Jun 2008
14486 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 12:29 pm to
Statists gon' state.
Posted by tigersownall
Thibodaux
Member since Sep 2011
15394 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 12:47 pm to
This is why I live in south Louisiana. frick all this hippie shite. Its bad enough they are banning it on college campuses.
Posted by The Third Leg
Idiot Out Wandering Around
Member since May 2014
10061 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 1:05 pm to
We are gonna look back and hate ourselves when all these poors stop smoking and live longer.

We don't need bans, we need to let nature take it's course. Smoking has been deemed lower class behavior by way of American Propagandist efforts.

This fact has forced middle and Upper Class Americans to discard the vice. We should leave it as is and idealize the smoking behavior in circles of poverty while pushing massively subsidized birth control for poors, funding it all with an increased tobacco tax.

Stop breeding poverty, people.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
91194 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 1:14 pm to
I'm glad I live where I live. Just about all bars, casinos, and even a few restaurants still allow smoking inside. There are no bans it's up to the businesses, as it should be. But then again there is a high percentage of people in the delta who smoke, probably more smoke than don't smoke
Posted by GoBigOrange86
Meine sich're Zuflucht
Member since Jun 2008
14486 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 2:15 pm to
I recall, well before Tennessee banned smoking in restaurants, that numerous restaurants were ending smoking on their premises entirely of their own volition. That's just like government, though. Wait until a movement gains traction then try and pass a law and act like it was all your idea anyway.
Posted by UsingUpAllTheLetters
Stuck in Transfer Portal
Member since Aug 2011
8514 posts
Posted on 7/9/14 at 3:40 pm to
I don't even smoke, but frick that. That's just another shaming tactic.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram