- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hobby Lobby decsion offers fodder for Democrat "War On Womenz" meme.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:04 pm
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:04 pm
?@WhiteHouse
?@WhiteHouse
Senator Harry ReidVerified account
?@SenatorReid
@NancyPelosi
@NancyPelosi
quote:
RT if you agree: Women—not their bosses—should be able to make their own health care decision
?@WhiteHouse
quote:
"President Obama believes...women should make personal health care decisions for themselves." —@PressSec: LINK #HobbyLobbyions. #HobbyLobby #NotMyBossesBusiness
Senator Harry ReidVerified account
?@SenatorReid
quote:
It's time that five men on the Supreme Court stop deciding what happens to women.
@NancyPelosi
quote:
Allowing CEOs to limit the medical procedures available to employees is a gross violation of workers’ religious rights. #NotMyBossBusiness
@NancyPelosi
quote:
SCOTUS took an outrageous step against women's rights, setting a dangerous precedent that permits corporations to choose which laws to obey.
This post was edited on 6/30/14 at 12:09 pm
33
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:07 pm to GumboPot
I'm hearing War on Women, and War on Poor/Middle Class.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:09 pm to GumboPot
Considering how narrowly this decision was tailored, it's apparently only a "war on womenz" working for "closely held companies" with religious convictions.
If they feel that strongly about it, they should protest by not accepting checks from that company.
If they feel that strongly about it, they should protest by not accepting checks from that company.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:11 pm to GumboPot
People that vote for congressmen in hope that said congressmen will overturn SCOTUS decisions are doomed to disappointment.
Pro-life proponents should have learned that lesson long ago.
Pro-life proponents should have learned that lesson long ago.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:11 pm to GumboPot
quote:
President Obama believes...women should make personal health care decisions for themselves
No he doesn't. If he did, he wouldn't have told insurance companies what benefits they were required to offer.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:11 pm to GumboPot
quote:
RT if you agree: Women—not their bosses—should be able to make their own health care decision
couldn't women opt out of their employers health care?
quote:
It's time that five men on the Supreme Court stop deciding what happens to women.
so throw out the constitution?
quote:
Allowing CEOs to limit the medical procedures available to employees is a gross violation of workers’ religious rights. #NotMyBossBusiness
so you think that companies should pay for the most expensive insurance coverage just so a women can have every medical procedure known to man covered?
quote:
SCOTUS took an outrageous step against women's rights, setting a dangerous precedent that permits corporations to choose which laws to obey.
not really.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:12 pm to teke184
It's amazing out deceptive Obama and the WH are especially with this comment:
Like this decision has anything to do with women's healthcare choices.
quote:
Women—not their bosses—should be able to make their own health care decision
Like this decision has anything to do with women's healthcare choices.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:14 pm to GumboPot
yep a women has a choice to be on her employers insurance or not. This ruling doesn't take away that choice.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:15 pm to Tigerlaff
quote:
If he did, he wouldn't have told insurance companies what benefits they were required to offer.
That's what Obamacare does. It requires a certain level of coverage.
This post was edited on 6/30/14 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:15 pm to GumboPot
quote:When THEY PAY FOR IT they can make whatever choice they like.
RT if you agree: Women—not their bosses—should be able to make their own health care decision
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:17 pm to GumboPot
When I got the AP "ding" for breaking news on my phone and I saw the decision, I knew we were in for another round of "the war on women" 
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:19 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Senator Harry ReidVerified account
?@SenatorReid
quote:
It's time that five men on the Supreme Court stop deciding what happens to women.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:20 pm to a want
quote:
When I got the AP "ding" for breaking news on my phone and I saw the decision, I knew we were in for another round of "the war on women"
95% of the electorate do not understand the nuances of this decision so hell, why not? If you're a Dem, milk that cow until she's dry.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:21 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Would the exemption (Hobby Lobby)…extend to employers with religiously grounded objections to blood transfusions (Jehovah's Witnesses); antidepressants (Scientologists); medications derived from pigs, including anesthesia, intravenous fluids, and pills coated with gelatin (certain Muslims, Jews, and Hindus); and vaccinations[?]…Not much help there for the lower courts bound by today's decision.
Part of Ginsberg's dissent. I don't know the actual answer, but should it not be "yes"?
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:21 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
When THEY PAY FOR IT they can make whatever choice they like
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:25 pm to GumboPot
quote:
@NancyPelosi
quote:
SCOTUS took an outrageous step against women's rights, setting a dangerous precedent that permits corporations to choose which laws to obey.
L O fricking L.
The only difference between that CEO and the POTUS is that if the POTUS doesn't want to follow the current healthcare law, he gets to change it unilaterally with the unanimous consent of the Dems.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:26 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Part of Ginsberg's dissent. I don't know the actual answer, but should it not be "yes"?
Agree. The answer should be yes. However in practice IDK how this particular question will play out.
Obamacare has the potential to collapse with a "yes" answer.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:28 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Would the exemption (Hobby Lobby)…extend to employers with religiously grounded objections to blood transfusions (Jehovah's Witnesses); antidepressants (Scientologists); medications derived from pigs, including anesthesia, intravenous fluids, and pills coated with gelatin (certain Muslims, Jews, and Hindus); and vaccinations
It might even extend to gay wedding cakes!
ONOZ!
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:28 pm to GumboPot
That OP reflects a pretty sweet melt that I wasn't really expecting from such a narrow ruling.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 12:29 pm to 90proofprofessional
Nice gif.
Page 1 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News