- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Halle Berry Ordered to Pay 16k/month in Child Support
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:17 am to Jack Daniel
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:17 am to Jack Daniel
quote:And it's not even debatable.
Go through a divorce with a kid involved in Louisiana and come get back with me about which way the laws are slanted
0
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:20 am to boosiebadazz
Dude screws Halle Berry AND gets paid! Sounds like a win-win situation to me. 
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:21 am to boosiebadazz
quote:and what state was this in? Im not guessing LA.
Remember this the next time you bitch about family law being slanted in favor of the woman...
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:21 am to boosiebadazz
Family law is slanted towards the spouse that makes less money, not necessarily women. It just so happens that the vast majority of the time the woman makes less money.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:23 am to boosiebadazz
My coworker got screwed. Her kids used to live with her, ex got them every other weekend (and usually pawned them off on his parents)
But because she made more....she has to pay him child support
But because she made more....she has to pay him child support
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:27 am to Jack Daniel
It's awful all over. There are judges, male judges, who have gone on the record saying they'd rather put children in the custody of drug addicted jobless mothers over stable fathers just because it's the mother. it's an awful 1950's mindset that family courts have, that and the mindset that all fathers are deadbeats waiting to happen (not to mention the wallet rape of "what she's accustomed to AND women outright lying to courts...). Hopefully a new generation of family courts will turn that tide a little more each year.
people make fun of mens rights, and i agree, generally we got it pretty good, ha, but in family courts, mens rights are almost non existent.
people make fun of mens rights, and i agree, generally we got it pretty good, ha, but in family courts, mens rights are almost non existent.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:27 am to boosiebadazz
quote:Family law is slanted in favor of the woman. This anecdote changes nothing.
Remember this the next time you bitch about family law being slanted in favor of the woman.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:30 am to boosiebadazz
She's a multimillionaire with continued earnings...it would have been double if she were a man.
It's slanted big time
It's slanted big time
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:31 am to Seymour
quote:
Family law is slanted towards the spouse that makes less money, not necessarily women. It just so happens that the vast majority of the time the woman makes less money.
Agreed. Now does the man make more money in the majority of cases? Sure. Is that what leads to this diea that the law is somehow slanted in the favor of women, solely based on their sex? Sure.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:31 am to boosiebadazz
You're adorable.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:32 am to jbgleason
quote:
Hey, a plane crashed once. Planes aren't safe.
well, when's the last time a car fell out of the sky?
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:32 am to junkfunky
I know, right?
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:33 am to lsunurse
My old boss has 3 kids with his ex wife. They have joint custody. He keeps them just as much as she does and he still pays $1000 a month in child support. Yea.....it's slanted.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:36 am to boosiebadazz
The people that bitch about the law being slanted in favor of women are ex-husbands that made more money than their ex-wife and then got dragged over the coals.
That being said, the law likely needs to be changed from the idea that the spouse earning less should remain in the same position because it's impossible for one to remain the same without negatively affecting the livelihood of the other. When you have to pay for two homes, you have more bills. Both spouses should have to take a hit in lifestyle, not just one, especially in no-fault divorces.
That being said, the law likely needs to be changed from the idea that the spouse earning less should remain in the same position because it's impossible for one to remain the same without negatively affecting the livelihood of the other. When you have to pay for two homes, you have more bills. Both spouses should have to take a hit in lifestyle, not just one, especially in no-fault divorces.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:37 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Remember this the next time you bitch about family law being slanted in favor of the woman...
What rock do you live under?
quote:
According to some estimates, only about 10 percent to 15 percent of divorced or single fathers have sole custody of their children. The remaining fathers have either joint custody or no custody of their children.
LINK
quote:
According to 2010 Census records, of the 400,000 people receiving spousal support, only 3 percent were men.
LINK
Why don't you do a little research before you post
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:38 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Remember this the next time you bitch about family law being slanted in favor of the woman...
Big ole lulz.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:38 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
and support is based on the standard of living and the relative income of the parties
lulzy. A sample size of 1.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:40 am to boosiebadazz
Gabriel Aubrey 
Got to sex Halle Berry , got to spray her guts 
, and gets custody and paid 16k 
Give that man a golf clap.
Got to sex Halle Berry , got to spray her guts , and gets custody and paid 16k Give that man a golf clap.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:44 am to olemissfan26
quote:boosiebadazz..... more like boosielazyazz, amirite.
Why don't you do a little research before you post
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:47 am to CarRamrod
quote:
boosielazyazz
Page 2 of 8
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News