- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: St. George keeps changing their budget.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 10:09 am to sec13rowBBseat28
Posted on 2/6/14 at 10:09 am to sec13rowBBseat28
quote:The SG promoters called the magnet school parents "segregationists."
Where did I insult the thousands of magnet school parents?
And that is really ironic since the main reason the SG promoters want to carve out a new school district is so they can have a majority white school district.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 10:09 am to BigJim
quote:And look what members of the metro council wanted to do to the St George fire department board.
There are potential solutions (like a series of charter schools created by the EBRPSB but under the management of a St. george board).
Posted on 2/6/14 at 10:11 am to sec13rowBBseat28
quote:Yeah, so? Did it pass? No, it didn't. It didn't even make it to the point of a discussion. Democracy in action.
And look what members of the metro council wanted to do to the St George fire department board.
If you're trying to make it look like SG is being treated unfairly, you shouldn't use examples where SG won on an issue.
This post was edited on 2/6/14 at 10:14 am
Posted on 2/6/14 at 10:14 am to sec13rowBBseat28
Wasn't accusing you of anything, my friend.
quote:
Why the need by some to insult the thousands of Magnet parents?
Posted on 2/6/14 at 10:46 am to LSURussian
I thought that the vote was deferred due to Boe's absence. I didn't realize it had been shut down completely. If so metro council finally got one right.
I still don't have much faith in the council though, you have (in my opinion) 6 members who will automatically vote no on anything that has the phrase St. George or unincorporated anywhere in it.
I still don't have much faith in the council though, you have (in my opinion) 6 members who will automatically vote no on anything that has the phrase St. George or unincorporated anywhere in it.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 11:40 am to LSURussian
quote:
Yeah, so? Did it pass? No, it didn't. It didn't even make it to the point of a discussion. Democracy in action. If you're trying to make it look like SG is being treated unfairly, you shouldn't use examples where SG won on an issue.
So key opponents of SG tried to stack the board of the SG Fire District for political reasons, but sense they failed it was OK, and no harm no foul???
Not in my mind. It was a clear example of how people in city government will go to any means to protect their interests even if it hurts mine.
Stuff like that only serves to illustrate why people want the city of SG. They want to get away from these people who could care less about what we in the suburbs face every day.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 11:49 am to doubleb
quote:And you believe Bodi White and Lionel Rainey will always only look out for your best interests?
It was a clear example of how people in city government will go to any means to protect their interests even if it hurts mine.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 11:51 am to magildachunks
quote:
Yea, these people are ready to run their own town.
Yea, just like these fine experts are ready to run their town:
Posted on 2/6/14 at 11:52 am to hawkster
And posters tell me I'm off base when I say SG is all about race?!? 
Posted on 2/6/14 at 11:53 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
SpidermanTUba
Just imagine how great this country would be if liberals were as hard on their government as the people they were against.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 11:54 am to LSURussian
quote:
And you believe Bodi White and Lionel Rainey will always only look out for your best interests?
Don't put words in my mouth.
White doesn't represent me, and I could care less about who Rainey is. In reality White represents a very small part of what would be SG in the Senate.
You and Asgard are trying to tarnish the issues here by slamming people. That crap doesn't work with me.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 11:56 am to doubleb
quote:Where did I 'slam' you?
You and Asgard are trying to tarnish the issues here by slamming people.
quote:What crap does work with you?
That crap doesn't work with me.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 12:00 pm to LSURussian
quote:
And posters tell me I'm off base when I say SG is all about race?!?
You forgot about bias towards Italians, I guess.
Race or not, the fine ladies in this group are the ones who have proposed the ridiculous new legislation concerning residency, etc, in an immature and blatantly self-serving attack on St. George proponents. If that is not a clear, official documentation of the lack of ability to govern, I don't know what is.
If it is about race, it's about the racism of these women on the parish council.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 12:02 pm to hawkster
quote:Like Livingston Parish has done for years? And New Orleans?
the fine ladies in this group are the ones who have proposed the ridiculous new legislation concerning residency
Posted on 2/6/14 at 12:11 pm to LSURussian
quote:
Where did I 'slam' you?
You are slamming white and Rainey to cloud the issues.
quote:
What crap does work with you?
Facts, and constructive criticism.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 12:11 pm to LSURussian
quote:
Like Livingston Parish has done for years? And New Orleans?
Opposition to becoming more and more like New Orleans is certainly a motivation for the St. George movement.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 12:13 pm to LSURussian
quote:
And New Orleans?
Well we know New Orleans is a model of good government, right?
Posted on 2/6/14 at 12:13 pm to hawkster
quote:
Race or not, the fine ladies in this group are the ones who have proposed the ridiculous new legislation concerning residency, etc, in an immature and blatantly self-serving attack on St. George proponents. If that is not a clear, official documentation of the lack of ability to govern, I don't know what is.
Yeah, that was a stupid move (that both Delgado and Holden opposed-BTW). That said, I generally like Tara Wicker. She usually has more sense.
But please don't delude yourself. Should it ever get created, the St. George city council will have it's share of idiots as well. Every elected body does.
Only it will be less noticeable since right now the Advocate covers the Metro council relatively well. Not saying you won't be able to find out what is going on, just that it won't be as readily accessible.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 12:17 pm to BigJim
quote:
But please don't delude yourself. Should it ever get created, the St. George city council will have it's share of idiots as well. Every elected body does.
No doubt about that.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 12:36 pm to LSURussian
Livingston and New Orleans are not the issue here, the future of Baton Rouge and potentially St. George is. I think the previous posters point is that if you have half of the metro council that has made up their minds on any given topic before even discussing it, how is anything supposed to get done?
As far as name calling, I've seen it on both sides so far. What stands out to me is that while I've seen a few pro SG people make some stupid comments, the name calling from ELECTED OFFICIALS on the other side is more appalling to me. Not to mention the level of insults and generalizations coming from those against incorporating.
As far as leadership of the incorporation, I'm not a big Jenkins fan and I admit I don't know enough about Rainey or White to make an informed opinion. But I can say that I am firmly against anything that TogetherBR supports from what I've seen of them. I have heard from multiple people that the majority of the organizers and speakers at the recent event are from that group, any truth to that?
In the interest of full disclosure I currently have a home for sale in the St. George area. I am still undecided on whether or not I support the breakaway but heavily leaning for based on everything that's happened the past few months. I think the best thing to happen would be for the issue to come to vote and for us to hear a civilized debate from both sides. However Better Together had better rein in some of their supporters, I fear this is dividing the city and causing irreparable damage, regardless of how it turns out.
As far as name calling, I've seen it on both sides so far. What stands out to me is that while I've seen a few pro SG people make some stupid comments, the name calling from ELECTED OFFICIALS on the other side is more appalling to me. Not to mention the level of insults and generalizations coming from those against incorporating.
As far as leadership of the incorporation, I'm not a big Jenkins fan and I admit I don't know enough about Rainey or White to make an informed opinion. But I can say that I am firmly against anything that TogetherBR supports from what I've seen of them. I have heard from multiple people that the majority of the organizers and speakers at the recent event are from that group, any truth to that?
In the interest of full disclosure I currently have a home for sale in the St. George area. I am still undecided on whether or not I support the breakaway but heavily leaning for based on everything that's happened the past few months. I think the best thing to happen would be for the issue to come to vote and for us to hear a civilized debate from both sides. However Better Together had better rein in some of their supporters, I fear this is dividing the city and causing irreparable damage, regardless of how it turns out.
Popular
Back to top


0





