- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/1/13 at 9:45 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
I proved he has big runs early as well.
those are little runs.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 9:48 am to Chad504boy
quote:
those are little runs.
Yea, 20+ yards is really mundane.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 9:48 am to Chad504boy
if we can't all agree that Ingram is at best an average back, then there is nothing we can agree on
Posted on 10/1/13 at 9:49 am to saintsfan92612
quote:da fuq?
all agree
This post was edited on 10/1/13 at 9:50 am
Posted on 10/1/13 at 9:50 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Yea, 20+ yards is really mundane.
16 and 23 avg to 19.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 9:53 am to Chad504boy
quote:
16 and 23 avg to 19.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 10/1/13 at 9:56 am to saintsfan92612
quote:
if we can't all agree that Ingram is at best an average back, then there is nothing we can agree on
And that the offensive line can't block for ANYBODY in run formations and in short yardage situations. Unless it is the 4th quarter of a blowout victory.
Except Chad, who thinks Mark Ingram is Troy Davis 2.0 and somehow the offensive line tranformed to Hall of Fame material to a dumpster fire in 6 days.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 10:04 am to lsutigers1992
Didn't you post this exact same shite last night? Anybody with half a brain could see Ingram has been the worst back on the team over the last three years. Get the frick over it.
This post was edited on 10/1/13 at 10:05 am
Posted on 10/1/13 at 10:10 am to Chad504boy
quote:
*=None of Mark Ingram's carries came when the OLINE has played the worst two games in over 7 years time*
I'm sure you have some way of proving that the last two games were the worst in 7 years? Are you saying the Oline played well the first two games?
Posted on 10/1/13 at 10:14 am to Alatgr
quote:
Didn't you post this exact same shite last night? Anybody with half a brain could see Ingram has been the worst back on the team over the last three years. Get the frick over it.
And you're the JACKASS who refuses to see that a guy who gets 4.5 a carry is reduced to complete crap when he gets Mark Ingram carries in Mark Ingram situations.
There's a constant here, and it AIN'T Mark Ingram.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 10:16 am to lsutigers1992
quote:Dude, what?
And you're the JACKASS who refuses to see that a guy who gets 4.5 a carry is reduced to complete crap when he gets Mark Ingram carries in Mark Ingram situations.
There's a constant here, and it AIN'T Mark Ingram.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 10:22 am to OldSouth
quote:
Dude, what?
EXACTLY. And we're the ones who don't get it.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 10:33 am to lsutigers1992
To explain it to the retards:
Pierre Thomas has had to assume the Mark Ingram "feature I formation RB"/"short yardage RB" role the last 2 weeks (for the first 3 quarters until Robinson mops up). His stats:
15 carries, 29 yards.
Pierre Thomas has had to assume the Mark Ingram "feature I formation RB"/"short yardage RB" role the last 2 weeks (for the first 3 quarters until Robinson mops up). His stats:
15 carries, 29 yards.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 10:34 am to OldSouth
quote:
OldSouth
I'm convinced 1992 and lunchbox are the dumbest posters to ever type a post on saints talk.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 10:40 am to lsutigers1992
quote:So you're saying "we're using him wrong". Got it.
To explain it to the retards:
Pierre Thomas has had to assume the Mark Ingram "feature I formation RB"/"short yardage RB" role the last 2 weeks (for the first 3 quarters until Robinson mops up). His stats:
15 carries, 29 yards.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 10:44 am to Chad504boy
1992 what is your objective here?
you start these threads twice a week, what are you trying to achieve?
I mean the fans have seen it and now coaches have, Mark Ingram cant run behind an average or poor oline. He offers nothing in the receiving game if he did he would be out there.
you start these threads twice a week, what are you trying to achieve?
I mean the fans have seen it and now coaches have, Mark Ingram cant run behind an average or poor oline. He offers nothing in the receiving game if he did he would be out there.
Posted on 10/1/13 at 10:55 am to lsutigers1992
So I guess now it's Pierre's fault.
Our O line is overrated
Our O line is overrated
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)