- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Lsu and Stanford sure look alike with one glaring difference
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:11 am
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:11 am
Stanford 3rd down eff. 3 - 11
rushing 35 - 187
passing 13 - 20 -157
Do these stats look familiar? One thing Stanford has is a coach that understands how to be a physical power football team that has a plan to win games in a certain way and doesn't try to be something they are not. David Shaw knows how to manage his team and game situations. Yea they could of easily lost to Wisconsin but it seems he knows how to win games with a Miles type philosophy. Stanford has no off or on field distractions that hurt the team. They are a team on the rise while Lsu looks like a team in decline. Shaw is the epitome of what Les would like to be. I watched the Rose Bowl and they just resembled Lsu in their style of play minus the craziness from our coaching staff. We could be so much better with any brains at all. I'm not asking for a coach as intelligent as Shaw. Just half as intelligent would be nice. Just have some damn common sense and play the game the way it should be played. Is that too much to ask? Obviously it is, because it's the same old, same old story.
David Shaw >>>>> Les Miles
rushing 35 - 187
passing 13 - 20 -157
Do these stats look familiar? One thing Stanford has is a coach that understands how to be a physical power football team that has a plan to win games in a certain way and doesn't try to be something they are not. David Shaw knows how to manage his team and game situations. Yea they could of easily lost to Wisconsin but it seems he knows how to win games with a Miles type philosophy. Stanford has no off or on field distractions that hurt the team. They are a team on the rise while Lsu looks like a team in decline. Shaw is the epitome of what Les would like to be. I watched the Rose Bowl and they just resembled Lsu in their style of play minus the craziness from our coaching staff. We could be so much better with any brains at all. I'm not asking for a coach as intelligent as Shaw. Just half as intelligent would be nice. Just have some damn common sense and play the game the way it should be played. Is that too much to ask? Obviously it is, because it's the same old, same old story.
David Shaw >>>>> Les Miles
9
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:12 am to szeringue
SEC>>>>>>PAC 12
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:13 am to szeringue
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:14 am to szeringue
Come on....I don't like the results or how the offense has been run either, but do you realize if we would have had those run/pass stats and still lost people still would be furious? We had stats like that early in the season and people bitched.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:14 am to szeringue
The last time LSU hired a Stanford coach...
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:14 am to szeringue
Seriously. Light yourself on fire
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:16 am to szeringue
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:17 am to szeringue
It's Stanford. It's the PAC12. The numbers may look similar but put Stanford up against Bama or UF instead of Wisconsin, who is 8-6, and then they'd have leverage to talk about "national respect".
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:19 am to BeeFense5
quote:
Seriously. Light yourself on fire
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:21 am to SPEEDY
We just lost to an ACC team. This is not the time or place for SEC chest thumping. 
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:21 am to CajunSoldier225
quote:
It's Stanford. It's the PAC12. The numbers may look similar but put Stanford up against Bama or UF instead of Wisconsin, who is 8-6, and then they'd have leverage to talk about "national respect"
I'm glad we don't play in the ACC after last night.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:29 am to los angeles tiger
we scored 41 on Washinton
Stanford scored 13
but but but David Shaw knows offense
Stanford scored 20 points against an unranked team, we played a close game with a top 15 team.
Jesus people need to pull their heads out of their asses for 1 second.
Stanford scored 13
but but but David Shaw knows offense
Stanford scored 20 points against an unranked team, we played a close game with a top 15 team.
Jesus people need to pull their heads out of their asses for 1 second.
This post was edited on 1/2/13 at 4:08 am
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:32 am to SammyTiger
And Ole Miss got bent over by Texas while we barely got by.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:36 am to los angeles tiger
Is that what LSU fans want? is that your idea of great? lose 2 games, and then win by 6 points over an unranked team that was only there because of a bowl tie in?
Clemson was a good team, we got to play a good team in our bowl game. We didn't get handed a piss poor Big ten team.
Clemson was a good team, we got to play a good team in our bowl game. We didn't get handed a piss poor Big ten team.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:38 am to SammyTiger
Stanford would've beat Clemson and I don't think Stanford recruits at the level of LSU
This post was edited on 1/2/13 at 12:39 am
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:41 am to biglego
quote:
Lsu and Stanford sure look alike with one glaring difference
80 IQ points?
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:43 am to biglego
quote:
Stanford would've beat Clemson and I don't think Stanford recruits at the level of LSU
Their 20-14 win over an unranked,8-5 Wisconsin who is playing without their head coach makes you say that?
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:44 am to szeringue
quote:
Stanford has no off or on field distractions that hurt the team
To be fair you cant really blame this on the coach. LSU will never get the same quality people as Stanford gets.
Posted on 1/2/13 at 12:45 am to biglego
quote:
Stanford would've beat Clemson and I don't think Stanford recruits at the level of LSU
Posted on 1/2/13 at 1:33 am to SammyTiger
quote:
Their 20-14 win over an unranked,8-5 Wisconsin who is playing without their head coach makes you say that?
Wisconsin improved over the season and was better than the record indicated. And again do you think Stanford has the athletes LSU has? According to recruiting rankings they don't.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News