Do you foresee the SEC going to a 9-game conference schedule?

quote:

---

Will the conference be ok with just 3 OOC games in a 12-game schedule

---

Yes.

From a SOS standpoint should be no problem. Having quality depth will be just that more important playing an extra SEC game each year though.

I'm afraid they might - which is a major reason I'm against the idea of expanding to 14 or 16 teams

9 games sucks because:

1) an odd number of games makes for uneven # of home and away games in conference - an unfair advantage or disadvantage from year to year
2a) you lose an ooc game you could use to make money - a good part of the rationale for expansion is making more money. When home games net you a few million dollars you now have to generate a lot more money (per school) to justify the expansion
2b) this loss of an ooc game probably also means fewer interesting ooc matchups because teams will have lost profit from the previously standard ooc cupcake, will have 9 conference games to get beat up playing, and will probably not see any return on playing a tough/storied opponent out of conference
3) you will still play many opponents very infrequently - LSU for example will rarely get to play UGA, UT, and the mystery 14th team from the opposite division. Having a megaconference is more like have two conferences that share a conference championship game than having a conference with two divisions

quote:

---

1) an odd number of games makes for uneven # of home and away games in conference - an unfair advantage or disadvantage from year to year
2a) you lose an ooc game you could use to make money - a good part of the rationale for expansion is making more money. When home games net you a few million dollars you now have to generate a lot more money (per school) to justify the expansion
2b) this loss of an ooc game probably also means fewer interesting ooc matchups because teams will have lost profit from the previously standard ooc cupcake, will have 9 conference games to get beat up playing, and will probably not see any return on playing a tough/storied opponent out of conference
3) you will still play many opponents very infrequently - LSU for example will rarely get to play UGA, UT, and the mystery 14th team from the opposite division. Having a megaconference is more like have two conferences that share a conference championship game than having a conference with two divisions

---

you're leaving out the big one...
A lower percentage of your conference will become bowl eligible every year, thereby decreasing that revenue stream.

I oppose a 9 game conference schedule unless the season is expanded in the future.

All I know is this having Florida as a permanent opponent is for the fricking birds.

For baseball, I think the schedule would remain at 30 games.

You play 18 games against your divisional foes, and then 4 series a year against teams in the opposite division. A rotation would have to be set up similar to football.

If the SEC does go to a 9-game conference schedule, it will probably reduce the amount of neutral site/away games out-of-conference. The possibility of playing only 6 home games every other year probably won't sit well with most schools.

9 conf games & 3 out of conference games vs 8 conf games & 4 out of conference games will please people until that 9th conf game and subsequent loss(which wouldn`t have happened with a lesser opponent) starts costing the conference BC$ appearances. With scholarship limitations etc. every schools winning %...OVER THE LONG HAUL...will suffer if a ninth conference game is added to their schedule.

Basketball has done away with the divisional setup starting this season. This years schedule will still use the divisions as a guide but the standings will not be split into divisions. I would imagine after expansion the divisions could be gone altogether in basketball.

quote:

---

80% would be impossible with a 14 team, 9 game schedule

---

Not really. Even 100% is still possible.

Assume everyone wins their home games and all of their OOC games. 7 teams would go 4-5 in conference and 3-0 OOC for a 7-5 record, and 7 teams would go 5-4 and 3-0 for an 8-4 record. Is that likely to happen? No, but having the vast majority of the conference bowl-eligible would be likely, especially with the cakewalk OOC schedule that everyone would likely line-up.