- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Louisiana lawmakers advance bill to shield how athletic departments spend public money
Posted on 4/16/26 at 8:17 am
Posted on 4/16/26 at 8:17 am
quote:
BATON ROUGE, La. (Louisiana Illuminator) – Opponents of a bill to shield how Louisiana’s public universities spend their revenue on college athletes warn it’s a slippery slope, as it would be the first time the state hides how public money is spent from public view.
The House and Governmental Affairs Committee advanced House Bill 608 by Rep. Tehmi Chassion (D-Lafayette) on a 9-3 vote Tuesday. The bill would create a new public records exemption to conceal how much public money universities pay directly to student athletes. The payments are allowed under new “revenue-sharing” rules implemented after the NCAA settled a lawsuit last year brought by student-athletes seeking compensation.
Chassion’s bill was amended in the House Education Committee earlier this month to also exempt how much colleges spend on individual teams. LSU’s athletics department has since come under fire from its fans who have criticized the university for not investing enough money in its baseball roster.
Following the backlash, LSU athletics director Verge Ausberry committed to increasing the baseball team’s revenue-sharing percentage.
Members of the committee seemed to not understand the difference between revenue sharing — which is paid directly from universities to athletes with public money — and name, image and likeness deals, which are between student athletes and private companies. NIL deals are already exempt from disclosure under existing public records law.
The money used to pay student athletes comes from public sources. It is a mix of funding from self-generated revenue such as ticket sales, state dollars and, at some campuses, student fees.
There are currently no exemptions in Louisiana law for sharing records with the public that show how state money is spent.
LINK
This seems like some BS here.
Unless I’m mistaken, if RaginCajun03 is being paid by Louisiana Tech as a part time tutors, whether through Tech’s athletic department for study hall or student services, and someone wanted to find out how much he was being paid by the school, they could file a FOIA request and find out that he’s being paid $11.25/hr. Correct?
But what this bill seems to do is make it to where if someone wanted to find out how much money LA Tech was paying QB Leroy Hebert, that would be exempt.
Maybe I’m missing something here?
I do agree that true NIL payments, between a business/booster and an athlete, should never be made public unless those two private parties agree to it.
Posted on 4/16/26 at 8:32 am to ragincajun03
Less transparency is bad
Posted on 4/16/26 at 8:39 am to ragincajun03
If a politician wants to hide or shield you from you looking at something in louisiana you can 100% be sure that there is some frickery going on and theyre stealing your money.
Posted on 4/16/26 at 8:42 am to ragincajun03
If LSU has to divulge exactly how our shared revenue is divided, and other states do not have to do this, it will put LSU at a competitive disadvantage.
Posted on 4/16/26 at 8:43 am to ragincajun03
Landry doing landry things.
This post was edited on 4/16/26 at 8:44 am
Posted on 4/16/26 at 8:47 am to SouthEndzoneTiger
quote:
If LSU has to divulge exactly how our shared revenue is divided, and other states do not have to do this, it will put LSU at a competitive disadvantage.
So if other states want to hide from taxpayers how public university dollars are being spent, then Louisiana should hide from its taxpayers as well?
Posted on 4/16/26 at 8:51 am to ragincajun03
quote:
So if other states want to hide from taxpayers how public university dollars are being spent, then Louisiana should hide from its taxpayers as well?
its not taxpayer dollars. the athletic department is not funded with any taxpayer dollars and zero taxpayer dollars are going to rev share payments
essentially this is journalist making the argument that because they use land and facilities that are taxpayer funded everything in the athletic department is now public funds.
its bullshite and essentially trying to LSU football. that is all this is about
LSU uses zero public funds to pay the athletes and no you nor the journalist have any right to know what the starting QB is being paid vs the starting left guard. im sorry we dont.
Posted on 4/16/26 at 8:53 am to ragincajun03
quote:
So if other states want to hide from taxpayers how public university dollars are being spent, then Louisiana should hide from its taxpayers as well?
Taxpayers? That's really a complicated term. LSU self generates their own revenue, but once it is earned it becomes named "state money", and is then subject to public record laws. How they choose to spend their money is their business, IMO. They earned it.
Posted on 4/16/26 at 9:03 am to ragincajun03
I support the bill.
As a whole the tax payers know how much money is being spent (hard cap set) and where the money is going (earmarked for student athletes only). I really don’t think we need more transparency than that as LSU will distribute that money in a way that make the most sense for the athletic department.
I see the divulging of this information used as a way to cause internal strife, where outside pressures try to force LSU to allocate larger portions of the Rev sharing to programs that don’t generate revenue (heavy pressure for increases in women’s sports)
As a whole the tax payers know how much money is being spent (hard cap set) and where the money is going (earmarked for student athletes only). I really don’t think we need more transparency than that as LSU will distribute that money in a way that make the most sense for the athletic department.
I see the divulging of this information used as a way to cause internal strife, where outside pressures try to force LSU to allocate larger portions of the Rev sharing to programs that don’t generate revenue (heavy pressure for increases in women’s sports)
Posted on 4/16/26 at 9:07 am to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
I see the divulging of this information used as a way to cause internal strife, where outside pressures try to force LSU to allocate larger portions of the Rev sharing to programs that don’t generate revenue (heavy pressure for increases in women’s sports)
That’s the only point I see in regards to this bill, but even at that, seems to me LSU or any other state university can simply draw I direct line from revenue generated from ticket sales, media contracts, etc to payout for those sports, and just say, “Hey, if you think these other sports should receive more money, then start buying tickets and sponsorships”.
I know that wouldn’t be enough for single digit IQ idiots, but should be enough of an explanation and response for anyone with a functioning brain.
This post was edited on 4/16/26 at 9:08 am
Posted on 4/16/26 at 9:30 am to SouthEndzoneTiger
quote:
If LSU has to divulge exactly how our shared revenue is divided, and other states do not have to do this, it will put LSU at a competitive disadvantage.
That’s the logic behind pretty much all of the state-level legal issues around NIL, eligibility, etc. nowadays. State laws being written/rewritten for competitive advantage, state AG’s filing lawsuits against the NCAA over disputes… I get it, but I also hate it. Where does it end?
That’s a somewhat rhetorical question - it’s pretty clear to me that it ends with collective bargaining. But this current model where everyone is working to change their own rules for competitive advantage is just.. shitty, IMO.
Posted on 4/16/26 at 9:35 am to SouthEndzoneTiger
quote:
If LSU has to divulge exactly how our shared revenue is divided, and other states do not have to do this, it will put LSU at a competitive disadvantage.
Maybe for one or two years until other states decide that LA has discovered a great way to hide corruption and transfers of money and joined in a version of "Don't ask 'cause we won't tell."
Posted on 4/16/26 at 9:38 am to lsu777
quote:
LSU uses zero public funds to pay the athletes and no you nor the journalist have any right to know what the starting QB is being paid vs the starting left guard. im sorry we dont.
You could say the same thing about coaching or administrator contracts. Why do we have any “right” to know what Lane Kiffin is being paid?
On the other hand, ULL’s athletic department has received an average of $16.5 million per year of direct institutional support (read: university money) over the past 3 years. Does the same logic apply to their athletic department / revenue sharing?
Posted on 4/16/26 at 9:41 am to SouthEndzoneTiger
quote:
LSU has to divulge exactly how our shared revenue is divided, and other states do not have to do this, it will put LSU at a competitive disadvantage.
Sucks for LSU, guess they’ll has to figure out how to overcome it. There’s 0 reason for public funds to not be tracked.
Posted on 4/16/26 at 9:50 am to brass2mouth
quote:
There’s 0 reason for public funds to not be tracked.
There's 0 reason for LSU's athletic revenue to be labeled "public funds".
It's not public funds in reality. LSU earned that money thru ticket sales and tv contracts, donations, etc. Taxpayers did not pay for any of their earnings. Why should the public care what % of those earnings go to the QB?
This post was edited on 4/16/26 at 9:54 am
Posted on 4/16/26 at 10:09 am to ragincajun03
Now try this at the public universities in Louisiana that have a track record of not always being the best stewards of money.
Posted on 4/16/26 at 10:33 am to SouthEndzoneTiger
quote:
t's not public funds in reality. LSU earned that money thru ticket sales and tv contracts, donations, etc. Taxpayers did not pay for any of their earnings. Why should the public care what % of those earnings go to the QB?
It isn't but when you have buyouts for coaches that should be coming out of the fund but instead the state is paying part of that buyout so salary can be met every month then that is an issue citizens should be aware of.
Posted on 4/16/26 at 10:34 am to ragincajun03
quote:
seems to me LSU or any other state university can simply draw I direct line from revenue generated from ticket sales, media contracts, etc to payout for those sports, and just say, “Hey, if you think these other sports should receive more money, then start buying tickets and sponsorships”. I know that wouldn’t be enough for single digit IQ idiots, but should be enough of an explanation and response for anyone with a functioning brain.
I agree. However you have to realize in actuality that isn’t how it’s going to play out. I can already see the articles being written on how LSU doesn’t prioritize female athletes, now with line item data to support it?
Do you really need to see the accounting at a GL detail level?
Posted on 4/16/26 at 10:39 am to kengel2
FACT!
Just sent a FOIA request to find out what these state senators are hiding with their NDAs.
The 2 sent, thru my lawyer, we believe is the CCS scam and the initial email response we received was as it was to provide more transparency. I am unsure how signing an NDA makes transparency possible when you're hiding something from your constituents that are spending your tax money on shite they dont want.
Just sent a FOIA request to find out what these state senators are hiding with their NDAs.
The 2 sent, thru my lawyer, we believe is the CCS scam and the initial email response we received was as it was to provide more transparency. I am unsure how signing an NDA makes transparency possible when you're hiding something from your constituents that are spending your tax money on shite they dont want.
Posted on 4/16/26 at 10:41 am to ragincajun03
Public dollars need public accountability
Popular
Back to top

11










