Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Saints pick up 5th year option on DT Bryan Bresee

Posted on 4/8/26 at 11:19 am
Posted by Chadzilla
Houma
Member since Feb 2014
702 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 11:19 am
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178545 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 11:22 am to
mr fancy pants was wrong
quote:

bonethug0180


They are going to decline it, not because they don't want Bresee but because that is going to be far above his average (unless he blows up huge this year).

More likely he gets extended this year for around $7-8 mil per. If the extension happens late in the year or after the season it will likely be closer to $10+ mil per.
Posted by jamal
Places Unknown
Member since Jan 2013
13128 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 11:28 am to
Like Bresee but hopefully he can take his game to another level.
Posted by SirWinston
Say NO to War
Member since Jul 2014
104464 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 11:34 am to
Gemmy says the following about our Bryan:


Whether Brian Bresee is "good" depends on what you value in a defensive tackle: explosive pass rushing or stout run defense.

As of April 2026, he’s viewed as a high-potential starter who is still searching for consistency. Here is the breakdown of his performance over the last few seasons:

The Stats (2023–2025)
Season Games Starts Sacks Tackles Forced Fumbles
2023 17 0 4.5 24 0
2024 17 11 7.5 25 1
2025 15 15 2.5 37 1

The Scouting Report
Pass Rush Upside: This is his calling card. In 2024, his 7.5 sacks were tied for 4th among all NFL defensive tackles. Even in 2025, when his sack numbers dipped, he still generated 30 total pressures, ranking 37th at his position.

Run Defense Struggles: This is the main knock on his game. His 2025 PFF run-defense grade was a 46.2 (96th in the league). He can be moved off the line of scrimmage, which has contributed to the Saints' overall struggles against the run.

Durability: One of the biggest concerns coming out of Clemson was his health. He has largely silenced those critics, playing in 49 out of a possible 51 games over his first three seasons (only missing two games in late 2025 due to a knee injury).

The Verdict
Is he good? He is a solid, productive starter but hasn't yet reached "Pro Bowl" or "elite" status.

The "Yes" Case: He’s an athletic interior disruptor who can collapse the pocket. In a pass-heavy league, his ability to get to the QB makes him a massive asset.

The "No" Case: He is often a liability in the run game, and his sack production was inconsistent in 2025 compared to his breakout 2024 campaign.

This post was edited on 4/8/26 at 11:36 am
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
14824 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 11:46 am to
quote:

mr fancy pants was wrong


Weren’t you shitting on Breese all last year ?
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178545 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Weren’t you shitting on Breese all last year ?


And his play substantially changed afterwards. Your welcome. And I’ve given his props that he did start being a better run defender it appeared.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
122245 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 1:17 pm to
Our Bryan
Posted by Delusional
Member since Dec 2018
6635 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 2:16 pm to
You keep young ascending talent on rookie contracts, simple as.
Posted by whodatfan
Member since Mar 2008
22081 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 2:21 pm to
quote:


Our Bryan


don't encourage this fool. it's partly your fault he keeps up with this asinine schtick.
Posted by bonethug0180
Avondale
Member since Jul 2018
5398 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Guaranteed Salary: The fifth-year salary for 2027 is fully guaranteed, expected to be roughly $13.9 million


This is not rookie salary, which is why yes, Chadboy, I also thought they would forego picking it up and sign him to a cheaper per year instead.

But given some prices I heard floating around for DTs next year (or if any get extended this year), this price is actually not as bad as it initially looked. DTs are about to start getting paid well over this.

It does make me question whether we tried to extend him and it didn't work out so we picked up the option, or if they felt being flush with cap now it wasn't as big a deal to absorb this and have 2 more years to look at him.
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
23782 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 3:34 pm to
Trade him to the giants for sexy dexy. Wonder how much additional pick compensation that would require?
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
40380 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 3:54 pm to
I didnt think they'd pick it up either.
Posted by RUFshreve
Shree'pote
Member since Jul 2016
3102 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 8:11 pm to
We need someone lile Dexter to play next to him, which is why I think getting a real game changer at NT needs to be a priority in this draft.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
32224 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 9:10 pm to
You wanna see a true anchor nt next to him.. I wonder if christen Miller (Georgia) or Lee hunter (Texas tech) would be available in the 2nd? Lots of holes to fix, it's just how we want to address it this year
Posted by LooseCannon22282
South Alabama Fan
Member since May 2008
35851 posts
Posted on 4/8/26 at 9:15 pm to
Agree.

if you aren't stopping the run then you are basically cooked as a defense.

nothing more demoralizing than a team lining up and whipping your arse and keeping the entire playbook open at the same time.
This post was edited on 4/8/26 at 9:23 pm
Posted by ForTheWin81
Member since Nov 2021
1525 posts
Posted on 4/9/26 at 1:24 pm to
That's exactly my thought. There will be very quality NG's deep into this draft, we could get one with our second 4th or our 5th round pick. We resigned Ridgeway who made a huge difference when he was healthy, I would think that if they wanna address this they do it in the 4th or 5th
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram