- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
CBS News: 82nd Airborne preparing for Middle East deployment
Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:01 pm
Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:01 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Pentagon officials have made detailed
preparations for deploying U.S. ground forces into Iran, multiple sources briefed on the discussions told CBS News.
Senior military commanders have submitted specific requests aimed at preparing for such an option as President Trump weighs moves in the U.S.-Israel-led conflict with Iran, the sources said.
Mr. Trump has been deliberating whether to position ground forces in the region, sources said on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. It was unclear under what circumstances he would authorize the use of troops on the ground.
"No, I'm not putting troops anywhere," he told reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday when asked about ground troops, but quickly added: "If I were, I certainly wouldn't tell you."
Officials at U.S. Central Command referred questions from CBS News to the White House and Pentagon.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement: "It's the job of the Pentagon to make preparations in order to give the Commander in Chief maximum optionality, it does not mean the President has made a decision, and as the President said in the Oval Office yesterday, he is not planning to send ground troops anywhere at this time."
The military has also held meetings to prepare for how to handle the possible detention of Iranian soldiers and paramilitary operatives if the president decides to put American boots on the ground – including where the Iranians would be sent, two sources said.
The U.S. is preparing to deploy elements of the 82nd Airborne Division into the Middle East region.
The planning involves the Army's Global Response Force and the Marine Corps' Marine Expeditionary Unit.
Thousands of Marines are being moved now to the Middle East. Three warships and about 2,200 Marines from an expeditionary unit departed California earlier this week, according to two U.S. officials. It was the second such Marine unit sent since the war began, and it could be a few weeks before it's in place. The first was sent from the Pacific and is still making its way into the region.
The movements underscore the Pentagon's effort to expand military options available to the president, even as administration officials publicly decline to discuss potential next steps.

Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:04 pm to Jack Ruby
Sounds like things are winding down
Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:04 pm to Jack Ruby
Trump is 100% compromised. That assassination attempt was a message.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:05 pm to DeathByTossDive225
quote:
Sounds like things are winding down
That's what I heard.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:06 pm to Jack Ruby
Without further clarification on the depth of the planning, I will add to the discussion that generals have all kinds of plans drawn up in binders in their cabinets.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:06 pm to Jack Ruby
I have full faith in Trump and Netanyahu to do the right thing to keep America and Americans safe
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 5:07 pm
Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:07 pm to Jack Ruby
This was always going to end up with troops on the ground. Forays into the Middle East usually do
Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:17 pm to danilo
quote:
I have full faith in Trump and Netanyahu to do the right thing to keep America and Americans safe
Yes indeed. At the end of the day, we’ve got to send our boys to fight the enemy over there so that we don’t have to fight them over here.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:26 pm to gumpinmizzou
quote:
This was always going to end up with troops on the ground. Forays into the Middle East usually do
Really?
Hmmmmm....
Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:29 pm to Jack Ruby
Here we go, will have to see what happens.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:30 pm to Jack Ruby
What's wrong with being ready? Who knows what those goat frickers will do.
Almost like we are ending a 50 year terrorist regime.
Almost like we are ending a 50 year terrorist regime.
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 5:39 pm
Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:33 pm to loogaroo
quote:
What wrong with being ready? Who knows what those goat frickers will do.
We have a pretty good idea they will attack the soldiers, which will necessitate more soldiers, and then it's very likely chaos and sectarian violence begin, which wouldn't be good.
quote:
Almost like we are ending a 50 year terrorist regime.
This conflict is a lot older than that.
Copying the model that led to the revolution in 1979 doesn't seem optimal
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 5:33 pm
Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:35 pm to Stat M Repairman
quote:
Stat M Repairman
Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:38 pm to Jack Ruby
Good. While you're at it, ready three Army divisions, one Marine division and bring in an AF wing.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Copying the model that led to the revolution in 1979 doesn't seem optimal
I don’t know what it is about the Asian continent, but we refuse to learn any lessons there since September of 1945.
Every military interaction since then in that part of the world has just been the same set of wrong choices and absurdly predictable consequences.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:44 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Every military interaction since then in that part of the world has just been the same set of wrong choices and absurdly predictable consequences.
The funny part is how fricking bad the CIA is at things and how it's clear in hindsight they're reacting to each fire and trying to put them out, but people try to connect these dots post hoc to make the CIA this incredible boogeyman who perfectly creates these mass conspiracies over decades.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
The quintessential attribution of malice to that which can be more adequately explained by incompetence.
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 6:00 pm
Posted on 3/20/26 at 5:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
to make the CIA this incredible boogeyman who perfectly creates these mass conspiracies over decades.
We've been Mockingbirded for half a century into the idea that they are some infallible experts with America's best interest at heart. The CIA agent / CIA storyline trope in movies and tv been played out long ago.
Popular
Back to top

24









