Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

This is how fricked up immigration law is in America. Congressional dems laughing

Posted on 2/22/26 at 11:25 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
73663 posts
Posted on 2/22/26 at 11:25 pm


What Rep Stanton doesn’t tell you:

1) the woman illegally crossed the border as an adult in *2004*
2) applied for asylum. Denied by judge.
3) she faced a final deportation order in 2005. Appealed in 2013. Lost appeal. Appealed again in 2016. Lost again.
4) Arrested by ICE *during Biden’s term*
5) for some reason, she was released recently.


There is no other area of law that functions like this. It’s an embarrassment that she is still here. It’s an insult to the rule of law. We allow unlimited appeals and I am tired of it
Posted by mwrawls
Member since May 2022
163 posts
Posted on 2/23/26 at 2:14 am to
Is she here legally? If not, then she needs to be deported without any further questions. Why is this so complicated for some people?
Posted by burger bearcat
Member since Oct 2020
10476 posts
Posted on 2/23/26 at 3:38 am to
She needs deported. Would be a nice restaurant for an American to take over and run. Just leave the recipes and we can take it from there.
Posted by BoomerandSooner
Member since Sep 2025
2169 posts
Posted on 2/23/26 at 3:57 am to
quote:

she's a mom & small business owner who donates meals to feed the less fortunate.


Translation from Democrat speak: Oh, she so horny, oh-oh, so-so horny, oh, she so horny. She love me long time. Yes Yu, those are classified documents in my pants and me very happy to show Yu.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
90073 posts
Posted on 2/23/26 at 6:59 am to
Why was she released?
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
21824 posts
Posted on 2/23/26 at 7:02 am to
That’s how the law works when authorities don’t want it to work.

People mistake leftist governments for having low functioning governments. I’d argue it functions roughly how the people running things want it to… they just don’t care about outcomes for average people and want them scared and dependent on the government for survival.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
53829 posts
Posted on 2/23/26 at 7:10 am to
quote:

Is she here legally? If not, then she needs to be deported without any further questions

Mostly true, but there a few rare exceptions to this. Mt niece married a young guy who was brought over here from Europe when he was five. His mother did the paperwork for herself but not her children. So the poor bugger has lived in America for as long as he can remember and is a first rate dude and a welder. Luckily for him he got married and legal before this immigration thing blew up. But there is no way in the world that guy should have ever been deported.
Posted by jrobic4
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
12820 posts
Posted on 2/23/26 at 7:23 am to
quote:

there is no way in the world that guy should have ever been deported


Um...yes there is! You know if you're illegal, you know there is a pathway to citizenship, and you know you need to follow it. End of story!
Posted by Sweep Da Leg
Member since Sep 2013
2656 posts
Posted on 2/23/26 at 7:35 am to
Life is so many different things, BUT the one thing life is NOT, is fair. Tough shite
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
10225 posts
Posted on 2/23/26 at 7:53 am to

follow the laws … then assimilate

Posted by USAFTiger42
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2016
3778 posts
Posted on 2/23/26 at 8:44 am to
After that 3rd denial should've been a 3 strikes and you're out. Force a cooldown period of 10 or so years. Obviously she never followed the law to begin with.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
94871 posts
Posted on 2/23/26 at 9:07 am to
quote:

she's back where she belongs: running her West Valley restaurants with her family.


Shouldn't be too hard for ICE to track her down again
Posted by deuceiswild
South La
Member since Nov 2007
4626 posts
Posted on 2/23/26 at 9:14 am to
quote:

Is she here legally?


The left has intentionally muddled the definition of legal. To a sane person, she is not here legally.

But what happens is, they apply for asylum or citizenship and are given court dates ten years out. Court date comes, and then some other loophole allows extending things another several years. The left will claim this is "legal" which I suppose is true. And while true, sane people know its BS.

Finally, a sane administration tries deporting her, and the left says she's here "legally" and has been here for 15+ years so we feel sorry for the person, disregarding the fact that she should have been deported over a decade ago.
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
36789 posts
Posted on 2/23/26 at 9:28 am to
quote:

Is she here legally?

No. She applied for asylum multiple times and was rejected multiple times dating back years ago. But she was still here. Illegally.

Deportation is the answer. It's the ONLY answer.

It's crazy that third-world crap hole countries stand so strongly against the ghey stuff with an unbreakable resolve, but we here in "the shining beacon on the summit" (USA) can't quit making commercials and television programs with poofters grotesquely sucking face.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram