Started By
Message

More LHSAA… they want to allow one free transfer again…

Posted on 2/10/26 at 6:05 pm
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
54142 posts
Posted on 2/10/26 at 6:05 pm
From the By-U sports Facebook

quote:

So much for being a Prinicpal’s Organization.

LHSAA members today were basically told in not so many words that if they do not pass legislation enacting a one time free transfer rule that the State Legislature is going to intervene and place it on them.

So it’s coming, folks.

Players WILL NOT be allowed to follow coaches, be coerced via recruiting and/or leave to become eligible because ineligible at other schools.


What they may want to look into is changing “select” and “nonselect” into “zoned” and “nonzoned”…
Posted by geauxtigers87
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2011
27177 posts
Posted on 2/10/26 at 6:27 pm to
why would the state legislature want to do this?
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
43982 posts
Posted on 2/10/26 at 6:42 pm to
Explain this to me, maybe I am misreading this.

This statement:

quote:

LHSAA members today were basically told in not so many words that if they do not pass legislation enacting a one time free transfer rule that the State Legislature is going to intervene and place it on them.


And this statement:


quote:

Players WILL NOT be allowed to follow coaches, be coerced via recruiting and/or leave to become eligible because ineligible at other schools.


Seem to be contradictory. Explain it to me like I am a two year old.
Posted by xBirdx
Member since Sep 2018
2535 posts
Posted on 2/10/26 at 7:00 pm to
I see nothing wrong with it, if they limit it to one time, unlike the ncaa.

If I, as a parent, want my kid to go to a different school, for any reason, and I can provide transportation, then so be it.
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
32531 posts
Posted on 2/10/26 at 7:18 pm to
Some Holy Cross and Brother Martin wrestlers, who left St Paul’s, started that shite..
Posted by TheBob
Metairie
Member since Jun 2005
17036 posts
Posted on 2/10/26 at 7:24 pm to
There’s plenty fricking wrong with it. This is a foot in the door to frick up high school football the same way college football got fricked up.

It starts as a one time transfer, then before you know it, the sport is completely fricked. Because this won’t be enough, and they’ll just keep adding and adding and adding.

Pandora’s box. Keep the bitch closed.

And I hit a fricking pothole this morning and almost ripped my car apart. How about fix that instead of worrying about high school sports and a private organization.
Posted by xBirdx
Member since Sep 2018
2535 posts
Posted on 2/10/26 at 7:34 pm to
Well it’s all sports, not just football.

And again/ if they keep it to one year, it will be ok.

Why the hell can’t I let my kid go to school where he wants without having to miss 25% of his high school career.

That’s absolutely retarted, bc how it is now- Karen Hoyt gets to pick and choose who sits and doesn’t. If she holds a grudge against the school you are going to, which she is known for, you are SOL.
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
89896 posts
Posted on 2/10/26 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

Players WILL NOT be allowed to follow coaches, be coerced via recruiting and/or leave to become eligible because ineligible at other schools.


so naive
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
54142 posts
Posted on 2/10/26 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

why would the state legislature want to do this?


What I’m wondering is the breakdown of where all the legislators come from… I suspect it heavily favors select schools
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
33718 posts
Posted on 2/10/26 at 8:18 pm to
The legislators are not going to turn on principals

Not if they plan on getting re-elected
Posted by blueboxer1119
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2013
9657 posts
Posted on 2/10/26 at 10:00 pm to
I know it’s an issue transferring from public to private, but what if a kid transfers from private to public?
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
62016 posts
Posted on 2/10/26 at 11:21 pm to
quote:

What I’m wondering is the breakdown of where all the legislators come from… I suspect it heavily favors select schools


I was told this is a Northshore push for sending their kids to the Catholic League.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
54142 posts
Posted on 2/10/26 at 11:25 pm to
quote:

The legislators are not going to turn on principals Not if they plan on getting re-elected


They’re going to choose the money (that wants to end the split) over the principals though
Posted by Old Man and a Porch
Member since Dec 2023
763 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 5:10 am to
Why should my tax dollars pay for a kid that does not live in my district?
Posted by TheBob
Metairie
Member since Jun 2005
17036 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 6:28 am to
I don’t know of a single Northshore school voting in favor of this.

This will absolutely wreck programs. Tampering will be out of control and how will this be policed? Attendance zones? What would be the point of those anymore?

There’s just way too many question marks that won’t be able to be answered. If they ram this through, everything is fricked. Bookmark it.
Posted by Dock Holiday
Member since Sep 2015
1887 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 6:29 am to
quote:

I know it’s an issue transferring from public to private, but what if a kid transfers from private to public?


You have to "live" in the public school district.
If you already live in that district, you are free to transfer and not sit.

Having said that I know of a kid that played varsity last season at a public school and is now playing varsity at a private school, did not sit. Not sure how they were able to get the waiver from LHSAA, but they did it.
Posted by AtlantaLSUfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2009
26885 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 6:41 am to
There should be something to allow kids at schools that receive constant transfers-in that would let the kids losing their spot to shenanigans leave without penalty.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
37216 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 7:24 am to
quote:

There’s plenty fricking wrong with it. This is a foot in the door to frick up high school football the same way college football got fricked up.

It starts as a one time transfer, then before you know it, the sport is completely fricked. Because this won’t be enough, and they’ll just keep adding and adding and adding.

Pandora’s box. Keep the bitch closed.

And I hit a fricking pothole this morning and almost ripped my car apart. How about fix that instead of worrying about high school sports and a private organization.



how about you dont own the mother fricking kids and their skills....if you dont want the kids to leave....provide better facilities, better coaching, more support


this isnt the NCAA where boosters are going to pay for a kids. GTFO acting like you own the kid.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
37216 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 7:26 am to
quote:


I see nothing wrong with it, if they limit it to one time, unlike the ncaa.

If I, as a parent, want my kid to go to a different school, for any reason, and I can provide transportation, then so be it.


% but all the people who feel like they own a kids skills are going to be pissed. How dare he leave us and go somewhere else...who the frick does he think he is? I mean do his parents think they are better than us?


for all the ones bitching....here is a simple solution...learn to fricking compete and invest in your schools and programs instead of just complaining that things are unfair!!!

kids dont leave if you are providing a better learning environment, better teachers, better coaches, better facilities, better fan support, better support to get them to the next level etc etc
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
37216 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 7:30 am to
quote:

Having said that I know of a kid that played varsity last season at a public school and is now playing varsity at a private school, did not sit. Not sure how they were able to get the waiver from LHSAA, but they did it.


private schools have actual districts too, could be the case. lots of ways he could have gotten the waiver though


but i love the hypocrisy.... start at a private school and then transfer to your in zone public school....oh thats ok. but god forbid you go to a public school and realize its dog shite with class disruptors all over the place and overall bad learning environment. and you transfer to a private school......well we cant have that, must sit a year



in the end....the kids should be able to go to whatever school they want in that school boards area. and LHSAA should allow a kid to transfer


why is it ok for adults to transfer jobs? wtf is the difference?

lets say a kid is a bad arse QB....but he has the #1 qb in the country in front of him in the same class.....should he never get to play because he lives inside some imaginary lines? thats stupid as shite.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram