- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Simulated Game between 2019 LSU Tigers and 2025 Indiana Hoosiers (Claude AI)
Posted on 1/20/26 at 6:21 am
Posted on 1/20/26 at 6:21 am
Projected Final Score: LSU 38, Indiana 31
Here’s my reasoning:
Why LSU would win:
1. Unmatched offensive firepower - That 2019 LSU offense is considered one of the greatest in college football history. Burrow’s 60 TDs broke records, and they had TWO future NFL Pro Bowl 1,500-yard receivers.
2. Elite competition tested - LSU beat SEVEN top-10 teams, including five top-5 teams by an average margin of 20 points. They faced defenses much better than what Indiana saw in 2025.
3. Playoff experience edge - In the actual playoffs, Burrow threw for 956 yards and 12 TDs in two games (63-28 vs Oklahoma, 42-25 vs Clemson).
4. Explosive plays - LSU averaged 7.89 yards per play with multiple 50+ and 60+ point performances.
Why Indiana would keep it close:
1. Defensive dominance - That 10.3 PPG allowed is elite. They’d create turnovers and force LSU into longer drives.
2. Mendoza’s efficiency - While his volume stats are lower, his decision-making (6 INTs in 16 games) would prevent catastrophic mistakes.
3. Complete team - Indiana went 16-0 for a reason - balanced, well-coached, clutch in big moments.
4. Modern scheme advantages - Six years of defensive evolution could slow LSU’s passing attack somewhat.
The Game Flow:
* LSU would jump out to an early lead (17-7 at halftime) with big plays to Chase and Jefferson
* Indiana would methodically grind back in the third quarter, using Mendoza’s mobility and smart play-calling (24-21 LSU after three)
* Fourth quarter shootout with both QBs making Heisman-worthy plays
* LSU’s superior weapons would make the difference in crunch time - a late Burrow-to-Jefferson touchdown connection seals it
* That 2019 LSU team is simply regarded by many as the greatest college football team of the modern era. While Indiana’s 2025 squad was magnificent in their own right, LSU’s offensive juggernaut combined with facing tougher competition gives them the edge in this dream matchup.
Here’s my reasoning:
Why LSU would win:
1. Unmatched offensive firepower - That 2019 LSU offense is considered one of the greatest in college football history. Burrow’s 60 TDs broke records, and they had TWO future NFL Pro Bowl 1,500-yard receivers.
2. Elite competition tested - LSU beat SEVEN top-10 teams, including five top-5 teams by an average margin of 20 points. They faced defenses much better than what Indiana saw in 2025.
3. Playoff experience edge - In the actual playoffs, Burrow threw for 956 yards and 12 TDs in two games (63-28 vs Oklahoma, 42-25 vs Clemson).
4. Explosive plays - LSU averaged 7.89 yards per play with multiple 50+ and 60+ point performances.
Why Indiana would keep it close:
1. Defensive dominance - That 10.3 PPG allowed is elite. They’d create turnovers and force LSU into longer drives.
2. Mendoza’s efficiency - While his volume stats are lower, his decision-making (6 INTs in 16 games) would prevent catastrophic mistakes.
3. Complete team - Indiana went 16-0 for a reason - balanced, well-coached, clutch in big moments.
4. Modern scheme advantages - Six years of defensive evolution could slow LSU’s passing attack somewhat.
The Game Flow:
* LSU would jump out to an early lead (17-7 at halftime) with big plays to Chase and Jefferson
* Indiana would methodically grind back in the third quarter, using Mendoza’s mobility and smart play-calling (24-21 LSU after three)
* Fourth quarter shootout with both QBs making Heisman-worthy plays
* LSU’s superior weapons would make the difference in crunch time - a late Burrow-to-Jefferson touchdown connection seals it
* That 2019 LSU team is simply regarded by many as the greatest college football team of the modern era. While Indiana’s 2025 squad was magnificent in their own right, LSU’s offensive juggernaut combined with facing tougher competition gives them the edge in this dream matchup.
This post was edited on 1/20/26 at 6:41 am
Posted on 1/20/26 at 6:22 am to tigertracts
Assimilated game? So, we like uhhh …mixing the 2 rosters together?
This post was edited on 1/20/26 at 6:23 am
Posted on 1/20/26 at 6:22 am to tigertracts
It will be interesting to see how many IU players are drafted compared to LSU’s 2019 team.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 6:29 am to tigertracts
quote:
Assimilated Game

Posted on 1/20/26 at 6:33 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Assimilated?
A simulated - - - spellcheck takes another scalp
Posted on 1/20/26 at 6:42 am to tigertracts
Assimilated.
Like the BORG.....
Like the BORG.....
Posted on 1/20/26 at 6:46 am to Koolazzkat
Nebraska played three ranked teams, 8,9 and 10.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 6:46 am to tigertracts
Indiana has five starting players who graduated high school the same year as Bryce Young, let that sink in how old some of them MF’s are
Posted on 1/20/26 at 6:51 am to tigertracts
I just don't think Indiana's defense, which was quite good, could stop LSU's offense for very long. Too many weapons on offense and the quarterback distributing the ball is the best to ever do it at the college level.
This post was edited on 1/20/26 at 6:52 am
Posted on 1/20/26 at 6:52 am to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
Some of Indiana players should be doctors by now
Posted on 1/20/26 at 7:19 am to tigertracts
Burrow and company wouldn’t score under 50 against this Indiana team.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 7:25 am to tigertracts
quote:
Modern scheme advantages - Six years of defensive evolution could slow LSU’s passing attack somewhat.
This is the only hope of that Indiana team, but modern schemes might not be enough to overcome the significant difference in talent level. Jefferson and Chase are already two of the best in the NFL with the talent they bring to the table. Toney and Daniels are great WRs for Miami, but they aren't generational as Jefferson and Chase.
I think LSU wins because Clyde would do a good enough job out of the backfield to make sure Indiana has to respect the run or screen pass, and that would often mean some one on one mismatches with our studs.
LSU 41 - Indiana 24
Posted on 1/20/26 at 7:52 am to tigertracts
quote:what a complete waste of time and energy.
Simulated Game between 2019 LSU Tigers and 2025 Indiana Hoosiers (Claude AI)
Those two teams will never play each other. All these comparisons are absurd.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 9:06 am to sportsaddit68
I got Chapgpt to factor in player stats vs the average along with team averages and it spit out 41-27 LSU so not far off from you.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 9:27 am to tigertracts
Indiana took away Miami's best receiver (a freshman). We saw what happened when teams tried to take away 1 of LSU's receivers. Jefferson, Chase or Marshall pick your poison. Oh and Burrow is way better than any QB that they faced this year.
This post was edited on 1/20/26 at 9:29 am
Posted on 1/20/26 at 9:27 am to tigertracts
quote:The NFL doesn't slow Burrow, Chase, and JJetts. 3 star college dudes, no matter how disciplined, aren't going to stop the 2019 LSU offense from putting up 50+. IMO, 2019 Clemson, Bama, and Auburn were MUCH better than Indiana's D, and all 3 of those teams plus Oklahoma beat them.
4. Modern scheme advantages - Six years of defensive evolution could slow LSU’s passing attack somewhat.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 10:22 am to tigertracts
Both Clemson and Georgia had defenses that were averaging 11 and 9 points per game going into the LSU game, and we saw how that turned out.
Also, none of these models account for how dominant the defense was playing by the end of the year once they got healthy, or that they played 5 current NFL starting QBs throughout.
Also, none of these models account for how dominant the defense was playing by the end of the year once they got healthy, or that they played 5 current NFL starting QBs throughout.
Popular
Back to top
15









