Now that mUh Epstein has fizzled out

That’s the way I have come to look at all of this. The left just throwing a steady stream of shite at the wall. They already know none of it will stick, but it will catch your attention for a moment.

Thomas Massie was on Face the Nation this morning. He is not letting Bondi off the hook.

I stand with Massie.

Did you just crawl from under a rock?

quote:

---

What hoax will the TDS crowd manufacture next?

---

The speed that about half this board stopped caring about the Epstein files is honestly impressive.

quote:

---

Now that mUh Epstein has fizzled out
What hoax will the TDS crowd manufacture next?

---

I's just glad the mods have weeded out the trollers.

Next will be why Jared Kushner is making so much money in international deals. Or some girl from Cali that has never been in the same state as Barron, will holler #metoo with him as the target. When questioned, she will know no details, cannot remember a thing, but must be believed.

quote:

---

Thomas Massie was on Face the Nation this morning. He is not letting Bondi off the hook.

---

Why?? The Bill itself gave the DOJ the duty and responsibility to redact what was necessary to redact. They passed the Bill in that form.

Why didn’t he make them release everything unredacted? Why didn’t he press to change the Bill?

Because it’s all political theater…

quote:

---

Muh redactions.

---

Muh disappearing photos....

It's always the same shite with these people. No matter what gets put out there, the smoking gun tying Trump to all this has mysteriously disappeared (according to them).

quote:

---

Off the hook for what?

Redactions that she was expressly authroized to make in the law?

---

FIFY

quote:

---

Why?? The Bill itself gave the DOJ the duty and responsibility to redact what was necessary to redact. They passed the Bill in that form.

Why didn’t he make them release everything unredacted? Why didn’t he press to change the Bill?

Because it’s all political theater…

---

He said he's not going to let up until the victims are satisfied.

He said Bondi failed to follow the rules of the new law and she will be held to account. Something having to do with redactions that were not authorized by the new law. Something called "inherent contempt".

Read this:

Massie threatens Bondi with "inherent contempt"

Republican Rep. Thomas Massie and Democrat Rep. Ro Khanna told CBS's "Face The Nation" that the DOJ is not fully complying with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which gave them 30 days to publish every remaining document the government has regarding Jeffrey Epstein.

"Todd Blanche is the face of this, but it's really the attorney general's office, Pam Bondi, who is responsible," Massie said. "There are several ways to get at this. Some take longer, some shorter."

"The quickest way, and I think most expeditious way to get justice for these victims, is to bring inherent contempt against Pam Bondi. That doesn't require going through the courts. And basically Ro Khanna and I are talking about and drafting that right now," Massie said.

"We only need the House for inherent contempt, and we are building a bipartisan coalition. And it would fine Pam Bondi for every day that she is not releasing these documents," Khanna added.

The House or Senate can vote to hold someone in inherent contempt, which gives them the ability to impose fines or have the Sergeant-at-Arms detain the person. Congress hasn't detained anyone this way in more than a century. It differs from "contempt of Congress," which refers the case to the DOJ for prosecution in federal court.