- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
No more student section in collegiate stadiums in the new NIL era
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:13 am
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:13 am
I’m going to say the quiet part out loud:
There is no logical reason anymore for a “student section” in college stadiums, and students should have to purchase tickets just like the general public.
For decades we justified student sections with the idea that college athletics exist for the students, that amateurism and the “student-athlete” model made football an extension of campus life.
But that world is gone. Completely gone.
With NIL, the transfer portal, pay-for-play collectives, and roster bidding wars, we’ve all accepted—whether we admit it or not—that college athletics is now a commercial entertainment product, no different in economic structure than minor-league football with university branding.
If the fiction of “this is about the student body” has been abandoned by everyone involved—coaches, universities, media, and especially the players—then why are we still clinging to the idea that students deserve a huge chunk of free or heavily subsidized seats?
Those seats have actual value.
They are paid for by everybody except the students.
And we keep pretending that the “student atmosphere” is some sacred tradition that justifies the cost.
Meanwhile, NIL collectives are begging fans for donations to pay players multimillion-dollar deals. Universities are raising ticket prices and seat licenses on the very people who fund the sport. But students still get prime seating at a fraction of the cost because of a rationale that no longer exists.
If we’re now openly in a professionalized system:
• Why should students get better seats than paying fans?
• Why should the public subsidize their gameday experience when the entire model is now business-driven?
• Why are we pretending that football revenue exists “for the students” when university administrators themselves admit NIL is the new economic engine?
If college football is a business, treat it like one.
Let students buy tickets on the open market, the same as everyone else. If they want to sit together and create a “student-section atmosphere,” great—buy the seats and sit in the same place. But the era of free or artificially cheap student seats is out of sync with the reality of what college athletics has become.
We can keep the traditions that still make sense.
But let’s stop pretending that the old amateur-model perks apply in the NIL era.
Time to modernize: No more student sections. Open market for all seats.
ChatGPT assisted.
There is no logical reason anymore for a “student section” in college stadiums, and students should have to purchase tickets just like the general public.
For decades we justified student sections with the idea that college athletics exist for the students, that amateurism and the “student-athlete” model made football an extension of campus life.
But that world is gone. Completely gone.
With NIL, the transfer portal, pay-for-play collectives, and roster bidding wars, we’ve all accepted—whether we admit it or not—that college athletics is now a commercial entertainment product, no different in economic structure than minor-league football with university branding.
If the fiction of “this is about the student body” has been abandoned by everyone involved—coaches, universities, media, and especially the players—then why are we still clinging to the idea that students deserve a huge chunk of free or heavily subsidized seats?
Those seats have actual value.
They are paid for by everybody except the students.
And we keep pretending that the “student atmosphere” is some sacred tradition that justifies the cost.
Meanwhile, NIL collectives are begging fans for donations to pay players multimillion-dollar deals. Universities are raising ticket prices and seat licenses on the very people who fund the sport. But students still get prime seating at a fraction of the cost because of a rationale that no longer exists.
If we’re now openly in a professionalized system:
• Why should students get better seats than paying fans?
• Why should the public subsidize their gameday experience when the entire model is now business-driven?
• Why are we pretending that football revenue exists “for the students” when university administrators themselves admit NIL is the new economic engine?
If college football is a business, treat it like one.
Let students buy tickets on the open market, the same as everyone else. If they want to sit together and create a “student-section atmosphere,” great—buy the seats and sit in the same place. But the era of free or artificially cheap student seats is out of sync with the reality of what college athletics has become.
We can keep the traditions that still make sense.
But let’s stop pretending that the old amateur-model perks apply in the NIL era.
Time to modernize: No more student sections. Open market for all seats.
ChatGPT assisted.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:15 am to Triggerduckman
Why would students want to donate later on when they missed out on a key part of their college experience?
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:16 am to Triggerduckman
The LSU student section is Legendary 
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:16 am to Triggerduckman
This is some short sighted shite, right here.
You know how you build a donor base? Through the student section. We fall in love with our school, partly through those experiences. That motivates us to donate.
Taking that away for short money is the dumbest shite I’ve seen in a while. This is how you kill the cash cow.
You know how you build a donor base? Through the student section. We fall in love with our school, partly through those experiences. That motivates us to donate.
Taking that away for short money is the dumbest shite I’ve seen in a while. This is how you kill the cash cow.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:16 am to Triggerduckman
quote:
ChatGPT assisted.
Of all the things you should frick off for in your post, this is the most egregious.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:16 am to Triggerduckman
Tell me you didn't attend LSU or college without telling me you didn't attend LSU or college
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:16 am to Triggerduckman
You want to encourage home field advantage.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:17 am to Triggerduckman
quote:
students should have to purchase tickets just like the general public.
Students have had to purchase tickets at LSU for over 2 decades...
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:18 am to DeathValleyBones
The LSU student section WAS legendary..
Its still good. ,For two quarters...
Its still good. ,For two quarters...
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:20 am to ProjectP2294
quote:
Of all the things you should frick off for in your post, this is the most egregious.
Dude wasted electricity on this shite.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:21 am to Triggerduckman
quote:
ChatGPT assisted.
Horrible advertising for that.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:21 am to Triggerduckman
There should definitely be students at the game. But our students are becoming a pain in the arse. Put them up as high as you can get, that way nobody can hear them when the band plays.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:23 am to Y.A. Tittle
Alas only one downvote to give.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:24 am to Triggerduckman
And then you’ll complain about LSU and the game day experience being “too corporate.” That is what will happen if you get rid of the student section.
A good way to make sure your donor base dries up is denying the students a reason to want to donate in the first place.
A good way to make sure your donor base dries up is denying the students a reason to want to donate in the first place.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:25 am to Triggerduckman
[quote]
Those seats have actual value.
They are paid for by everybody except the students. [/quote

Those seats have actual value.
They are paid for by everybody except the students. [/quote
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:27 am to Triggerduckman
College sports would be soooo much better without the college students.
Next do away with the bands, cheer leaders and dancing teams.
Then pipe in more musical slop.
Yea that would be great. STTDB
Next do away with the bands, cheer leaders and dancing teams.
Then pipe in more musical slop.
Yea that would be great. STTDB
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:32 am to Triggerduckman
frick off...
the students should get student tickets with how much tuition costs!.
the students should get student tickets with how much tuition costs!.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:36 am to Triggerduckman
I smelled out the chat gpt right away before I even got to the bottom.
Yall gotta relax with that chat GPT crap. It’s so annoying when people use it constantly for everything in unnecessary situations like this. Nobody wants to read your AI dissertation. Piss off
Yall gotta relax with that chat GPT crap. It’s so annoying when people use it constantly for everything in unnecessary situations like this. Nobody wants to read your AI dissertation. Piss off
Posted on 12/10/25 at 11:38 am to Triggerduckman
LSU student football tickets are not free.
Popular
Back to top

33










