- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Bunky's mostly peaceful fishermen
Posted on 12/10/25 at 6:59 am
Posted on 12/10/25 at 6:59 am
17
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:01 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:05 am to cajunangelle
Those “fishermen” have helped contribute to the deaths of more Americans including children than AQ, Saddam Hussein and the NVA combined.
I think we need to deal with other facets of the equation as well, but they’ve been declared as terror related groups and if they continue to push products that will destroy Americans whatever occurs as they attempt to continue doing that is on them.
I think we need to deal with other facets of the equation as well, but they’ve been declared as terror related groups and if they continue to push products that will destroy Americans whatever occurs as they attempt to continue doing that is on them.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:07 am to cajunangelle
Genuine question: why not hit them there...in port...or at their destination?
If they are an imminent threat to the United States in international waters, aren't they a threat in port? I don't think the strikes are illegal, but I would like to see an explanation.
ETA: this location doesn't seem to be Venezuela.
If they are an imminent threat to the United States in international waters, aren't they a threat in port? I don't think the strikes are illegal, but I would like to see an explanation.
ETA: this location doesn't seem to be Venezuela.
This post was edited on 12/10/25 at 7:16 am
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:08 am to cajunangelle
The most insane part of this to me is the left, once again being opposed to an 80/20 issue because orange man bad.
They’d be much more successful recognizing the vast majority of Americans aren’t on the drug cartel’s side and working with Trump on this.
They could then say “see where reasonable on issues that he is reasonable on”.
They’d be much more successful recognizing the vast majority of Americans aren’t on the drug cartel’s side and working with Trump on this.
They could then say “see where reasonable on issues that he is reasonable on”.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:09 am to cajunangelle
That just bags of rice and flour for the poor in the U.S. It’s humanitarian aid boats. Nothing to see here.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:09 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Genuine question: why not hit them there...in port...or at their destination?
Because there’s a whole big arse fricking ocean in which nobody else is harmed.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:09 am to cajunangelle
I’m waiting for the narrative to shift to: “gunning down drug boats is poisoning fragile oceanic ecosystems”
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:12 am to IvoryBillMatt
That could be seen as an act of war against Venezuela and a violation of sovereign waters and airspace. The target is cartels, many Colombian smuggling through Venezuelan ports. That’s why you hit them in international waters. Also, as the other poster noted, it’s safer.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:15 am to tide06
quote:
Those “fishermen” have helped contribute to the deaths of more Americans including children than AQ, Saddam Hussein and the NVA combined.
The Biden Administration, MSM and the Democrat party tower over all of them as they let us be invaded by land, air and sea. We should put all of them on fishing boats and let Hegseth start playing Nautical Missile Command. Go for the high score Pete!
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:21 am to grizzlylongcut
quote:
Because there’s a whole big arse fricking ocean in which nobody else is harmed.
The legal argument is that this is war, though. When we killed Houthi leaders in their homes along with innocent civilians, the civilians were considered just to be justifiable collateral damage.
This is why I think publishing the legal memo that justifies the bombings is necessary.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:22 am to IvoryBillMatt
Not sure, but you may have answered your own question. Striking in international waters is key. Striking in ports is war.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:24 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
Anti war-on-drugs Rand Paul not on board with this tactic either, huh?
Decades of failed gov policy, Trump tries something new &… the establishment reeee’s.
Shocked face.
It’s almost like they want perpetual drugs flowing into the country.
Wonder why.
Decades of failed gov policy, Trump tries something new &… the establishment reeee’s.
Shocked face.
It’s almost like they want perpetual drugs flowing into the country.
Wonder why.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:24 am to cajunangelle
Get those internet nerds on this video that can find a location from a piece of grass and a shadow on the ground 
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:25 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Genuine question: why not hit them there...in port...or at their destination?
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh… because that is foreign sovereign soil. That would unquestionably be a direct act of war.
The “fishing boats” are unflagged vessels in international waters.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:26 am to cajunangelle
I definitely am not showing this video to Rog and Bunk at our weekly Bad Orange Man Narco Boat Bros potluck dinner next week. Really, we’d appreciate if you’d take that down.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:26 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
If they are an imminent threat to the United States in international waters, aren't they a threat in port? I don't think the strikes are illegal, but I would like to see an explanation.
Careful what you wish for. Trump alluded to possibly doing just that.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:27 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
The legal argument is that this is war
Currently, against whom?
In a legal sense of course.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:30 am to tide06
quote:Isn't it interesting that terrorists, narco- or otherwise, only come from countries that aren’t dealing oil in U.S. dollars?
they’ve been declared as terror related groups
And it seems more than just simple coincidence when you consider that the dollar, which used to be backed by gold, is now backed largely by the Petro Dollar.
Posted on 12/10/25 at 7:31 am to cajunangelle
I view the drug dealers as pirates and it has always been open season on pirates.
Page 1 of 8
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News