- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Democrats hell-bent on expanding the Supreme Court
Posted on 11/29/25 at 11:56 am
Posted on 11/29/25 at 11:56 am
"Crockett did not argue for an impartial Supreme Court. She argued for a Supreme Court that supports Democrat policy preferences, and when it does not, she labels it “trash” and demands expansion. By aligning herself with Democrats like Schiff and Warren, Crockett made clear that court-packing is no longer a fringe position but a central goal for her party."
So, the Democrats are lining up to pack the court with FOUR more "Jacksons" when they control the three branches again?
Should Trump say, "I agree with the Democrats. Have the House and Senate send me the bill. I'll sign it". The constitution allows this, but I'm not sure enough Rinos would vote for it. At least it would expose the Dems who support it as the hypocrites they are by voting it down now or causing enough outrage that it doesn't get to a vote.
This may be the only sure opportunity the Republicans have to do it. We know the Dems would if they were in this position.
So, the Democrats are lining up to pack the court with FOUR more "Jacksons" when they control the three branches again?
Should Trump say, "I agree with the Democrats. Have the House and Senate send me the bill. I'll sign it". The constitution allows this, but I'm not sure enough Rinos would vote for it. At least it would expose the Dems who support it as the hypocrites they are by voting it down now or causing enough outrage that it doesn't get to a vote.
This may be the only sure opportunity the Republicans have to do it. We know the Dems would if they were in this position.
15
Posted on 11/29/25 at 11:57 am to ATCTx
quote:
So, the Democrats are lining up to pack the court with FOUR more "Jacksons" when they control the three branches again?
That's not true...
They want four more Crocketts on the court...
Posted on 11/29/25 at 11:59 am to ATCTx
Trump could try packing it himself just to engineer some court rulings against it.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 12:01 pm to shinerfan
Trump should say "Ok, if that's what you want: We're bumping it to 13 right now. I'll pick four more conservative justices right now. Thank you for your attention to this matter."
Posted on 11/29/25 at 12:01 pm to ATCTx
There's zero reason for this other than a naked power grab. "We don't have a majority to advance our agenda so we need to add more justices on our side." frick off.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 12:02 pm to Narax
IMHO, the Dems must and will move on this issue as soon as they have the power to do so.
Total conquest of the US Judiciary should be their goal. It's been amply demonstrated during these Trump years that the best way to stop any future Trump or MAGA-man is through the Judiciary.
Criminal proceedings against any future MAGA-man will be administered by the US Judiciary, which makes Leftist complete conquest of that entity to be all the more useful.
Any future MAGA-man with hopes of saving the USA will know that a Conquered Judiciary will not only block all of his efforts, but, also, will thrust him into federal prison for a very long time.
That should be enough to snuff out the Right Wing Resistance.
Total conquest of the US Judiciary should be their goal. It's been amply demonstrated during these Trump years that the best way to stop any future Trump or MAGA-man is through the Judiciary.
Criminal proceedings against any future MAGA-man will be administered by the US Judiciary, which makes Leftist complete conquest of that entity to be all the more useful.
Any future MAGA-man with hopes of saving the USA will know that a Conquered Judiciary will not only block all of his efforts, but, also, will thrust him into federal prison for a very long time.
That should be enough to snuff out the Right Wing Resistance.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 12:02 pm to ATCTx
Terrorists will stop at nothing to accomplish their end goals. They do not abide by rules or norms or historical precedent. There is only one way to defeat them.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 12:03 pm to shinerfan
quote:
Trump could try packing it himself just to engineer some court rulings against it.
The GOP won't support Trump on this.
In fact, the mainstream GOP will be glad if the Dems take Congress in the med terms.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 12:17 pm to Champagne
quote:
Criminal proceedings against any future MAGA-man will be administered by the US Judiciary, which makes Leftist complete conquest of that entity to be all the more useful.
Sondergericht time!
Posted on 11/29/25 at 12:19 pm to shinerfan
quote:
Trump could try packing it himself just to engineer some court rulings against it.
I like this idea
Posted on 11/29/25 at 12:25 pm to ATCTx
"How to become a 'Banana Republic's with just one simple step."
Posted on 11/29/25 at 12:36 pm to HubbaBubba
Banana Republic politicians want a Banana Republic. It's not difficult to understand.
I tend to agree with Thomas Jefferson who wrote to William Stephens Smith in a letter dated November 13, 1787 that “the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." If the non-thinking politicians push things then history could repeat itself. If not in our lifetimes then certainly down the road.
I tend to agree with Thomas Jefferson who wrote to William Stephens Smith in a letter dated November 13, 1787 that “the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." If the non-thinking politicians push things then history could repeat itself. If not in our lifetimes then certainly down the road.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 12:39 pm to ATCTx
Does that surprise anybody really and some will deny it
Posted on 11/29/25 at 12:42 pm to ATCTx
Once you get into the spiral of expansion and counter expansion, SCOTUS will eventually become another legislature.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 12:49 pm to TrueTiger
What is to stop the next Congress from reducing from 15 to 9 for example example and just eliminating those job so much for a lifetime appointment there's no job
Posted on 11/29/25 at 1:15 pm to dafif
quote:
What is to stop the next Congress from reducing from 15 to 9 for example example and just eliminating those job so much for a lifetime appointment there's no job
Who decides which seats are eliminated, the Chief Justice?
Posted on 11/29/25 at 2:41 pm to Champagne
quote:
IMHO, the Dems must and will move on this issue as soon as they have the power to do so.
Which is why any republicans who refuse to go scorched earth now are just useful idiots for the democrats.
Refusing to take drastic measures isn't going to stop the democrats from taking them.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 3:17 pm to ATCTx
Trump ought to do it
Posted on 11/29/25 at 3:21 pm to ATCTx
Why just four more? Can they justify the number? I would like it to be 4 million more so that every neighborhood will be well presented.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 3:37 pm to ATCTx
Crockett is so ignorant that she isn't capable of seeing the Marxist true intentions. If and when they regain power, packing the Supreme Court will be the lesser of evils they enact.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News