- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I don’t understand why LSU would want Lane to coach Ole Miss playoff run…
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:35 am
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:35 am
Outside of Kiffin wanting to do it. Get the argument that Ole Miss should let him, but how would this benefit LSU?
21
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:36 am to Crimson K
It wouldnt and they don't
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:36 am to Crimson K
I guess it wouldn’t other than Lane having more time to raid OM’s roster.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:36 am to Crimson K
Maybe it was an agreement to get him here in the first place? North Texas and tulane are going to do it depending on which one goes to the playoff
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:37 am to Crimson K
Well they certainly don’t, but they don’t hold the cards, Lane does
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:37 am to Crimson K
I mean it’s a pretty big dick move to have your new coach leading another team through a playoff run, knowing he chose your program.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:37 am to Crimson K
What cards do LSU hold?
This post was edited on 11/29/25 at 9:38 am
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:37 am to Crimson K
quote:How would it adversely affect LSU?
but how would this benefit LSU?
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:37 am to Crimson K
It would be better for LSU at least short term if he did finish at Ole Miss. But long term it could help his image if nobody can use that against him that he "quit" on his team. If nothing else, he can say he wanted to finish but was pushed out by OM.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:37 am to Crimson K
quote:
Outside of Kiffin wanting to do it. Get the argument that Ole Miss should let him, but how would this benefit LSU?
Because if Lane says yes I’ll come but I have to see this out first, and you tell him no way, you risk losing him. It won’t hurt LSU because our recruiting class is already finished and you can get to work on approved players in the portal knowing Lane would be the coach as soon as they lose in the playoffs.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:38 am to Crimson K
Isn’t him coaching an extension of recruiting on national television
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:39 am to Crimson K
They don’t want him too, but they will allow it if it’s one of lane’s demands for taking the job now
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:39 am to FearTheFish
quote:
How would it adversely affect LSU?
Transfer portal opens in early January where Ole Miss could presumably still be playing. So he would need to be spend a lot of time game planning for the rebels instead of assembling his staff and portal players for LSU.
Some of you are shockingly ignorant
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:40 am to Crimson K
I don't want coaching any more at miss. Get your arse to BR.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:40 am to Crimson K
quote:
how would this benefit LSU?
Well if it was a condition of Lane coming, that would be a pretty big benefit, no?
I’d honestly be fine with it. He is clearly trying to do right by the team and school he’s coached for six years. I find that commendable.
Assuming Frank is staying on as recruiting coordinator, we likely can manage while he FaceTimes where needed.
As long it’s signed and announced having him coaching in the playoffs actually does benefit us imo.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:40 am to FearTheFish
quote:
How would it adversely affect LSU
With signing day, portal window and needing to assemble a staff in coaching change season, I’d want a coach focused on the task at hand. If it was part of the agreement to get him to come, then I can see it.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:44 am to Crimson K
I am sure they would prefer not, but they aren't going to tell him no and risk him not coming here.
This post was edited on 11/29/25 at 9:45 am
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:45 am to Crimson K
quote:
Outside of Kiffin wanting to do it. Get the argument that Ole Miss should let him, but how would this benefit LSU?
The benefit to LSU is that if they refuse to allow it he won’t come.
And if LsU REALLY wants him, that’s what they let him do.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:46 am to Crimson K
Kiffin probably wants to coach in the playoffs for obvious reasons. There is nothing wrong with him wanting to.
LSU doesn't have the power here. If they want Kiffin and he is willing to announce he will be coaching LSU next year but wants to finish the season, then they either have to be ok with that or move on.
Ole Miss is the one who would probably not allow it.
LSU doesn't have the power here. If they want Kiffin and he is willing to announce he will be coaching LSU next year but wants to finish the season, then they either have to be ok with that or move on.
Ole Miss is the one who would probably not allow it.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:47 am to Hold That Tiger 10
quote:
Ole Miss is the one who would probably not allow it.
And Ole Miss
Being the one not allowing it helps LSU
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News