Started By
Message

Vote to release the Epstein files

Posted on 11/18/25 at 8:55 am
Posted by tigerrage08
Houma,LA
Member since Feb 2008
519 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 8:55 am
Why in the hell does there have to be a vote to release the Epstein files? This makes zero sense. If this was truly criminal behavior that was taking place, as I am sure it was, this should be public record and not require any type of votes. It doesn't matter which party these sick people are tied to; they all should be exposed and prosecuted just like any other civilian.
Posted by tankyank13
NOLA
Member since Nov 2012
8189 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 8:58 am to
Because your govt. is evil and corrupt.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42242 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 8:59 am to
These people in DC love nothing more than to parade around in ceremony & rituals they believe give themselves the appearance of power and importance.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60132 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 8:59 am to
It’s a club, and you aren’t in it
Posted by Chaz95
Dallas, Texas
Member since Nov 2007
19645 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:02 am to


they ain't gonna let themselves be discovered, bruh.
Posted by justjoe906
Member since Oct 2013
2170 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:04 am to
Because it gives Congress something to do that's politically related. They don't care about trying to pass any laws that will help the American people. Just keep the political banter rolling.
Posted by Man4others
Member since Aug 2017
2458 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:07 am to
They could just read the names on the House floor since they have immunity from defamation
Posted by RAB
Member since Aug 2019
1603 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:15 am to
It's all politics. Trump/MAGA had the Epstein football for the past 10 years and squeezed it for everything they could politically. Then when the Democrats were in the minority, they called the bluff. As Dan Turrentine said yesterday, "You can't blame Democrats for having fun with this."

Like the JFK/MLK/RFK files, we're going to be sorely disappointed with whatever is in the Epstein files.
Posted by Rip Torn
Member since Mar 2020
5738 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:17 am to
I could have sworn Biden was President with Pelosi as the Speaker in there somewhere and could have easily released them but then again you Epstein bros are pretty dense
Posted by PeleofAnalytics
Member since Jun 2021
4858 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:19 am to
So everyone can go on their preferred "news" network and give an interview about how their vote proves they are a valuable representative of the voters?....
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60132 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:21 am to
quote:

I could have sworn Biden was President with Pelosi as the Speaker in there somewhere and could have easily released them but then again you Epstein bros are pretty dense


and I could’ve sworn that Bongino, Kash, Bondi, and Trump all said they would release the files when they got an office.

And I remember a picture of Bondi releasing binders

And I remember Bondi telling me there were files and videos.

And then I remember all of them telling me that there were no files or lists and this was all a hoax.

Now they’re telling me that they are files, and the Trump that demanded that they be released. But for some reason, instead of just releasing them, there has to be a vote to release them.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112422 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:21 am to
The vote would be to remove legal bars for disclosure of certain documents/information.

Almost all documents that are not currently under some sort of gag order or prohibition (grand jury testimony/evidence) has already been produced either to the appropriate Congressional committees or publicly. The ones that fall outside of these are apparently those containing victim information.
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
27572 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Why in the hell does there have to be a vote to release the Epstein files?


Because if they release them the Hoax falls flat and the democrats look like fools again.

As long as there's "speculation" they can run to CNN and call Trump a pedo all day
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
26892 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:26 am to
quote:

Why in the hell does there have to be a vote to release the Epstein files?


There doesn't, I don't think, but I'm happy to learn something new.

It seems like whatever evidence exists under our control would be in 2 categories. Grand Jury stuff and court records, which could be blocked from release by the judiciary I suppose. The GJ stuff for sure will be blocked.

But it seems like our AG/DOJ would have most of it. There are pictures of boxes of DVDs, travel records, whatever they found at the island, maybe even some financial trails. Maybe not, but we don't know, and that's the point. Whatever the prosecution side of the DOJ has is under the control of the AG, who works for the president.
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
30922 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:26 am to
quote:

Because it gives Congress something to do that's politically related. They don't care about trying to pass any laws that will help the American people. Just keep the political banter rolling.


I think Epstein was a vile piece of shite. I think the same of his clients. However, if congress spent the same amount of time they spent on this to actually do something for this country we would be in a much better place. The republicans doing this are principled and the democrats are doing it to “get” Trump.

Can a bipartisan congress do something to actually help this country?
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60132 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:29 am to
The best thing congress could do for this country is make lobbying illegal, setting term limits, making congressional insider trading illegal, actually holding people in contempt, setting and maintaining a budget, make pork bills illegal, only voting on one issue at a time, and actually controlling the purse strings while holding intel agencies accountable

If congress did its job, we wouldn't worry about the president as much
This post was edited on 11/18/25 at 9:37 am
Posted by Rip Torn
Member since Mar 2020
5738 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:30 am to
100% correct
Posted by LSUtoBOOT
Member since Aug 2012
19118 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:30 am to
quote:

Can a bipartisan congress do something to actually help this country?

Like set term limits for senators and representatives?
Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
24486 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Vote to release the Epstein files



I saw them slip a last second hemp ban into a government funding bill, eliminating the $30B THC beverage industry on behest of big alcohol with the stroke of a pen.

You as a citizen have no control. Like, at all. You have no control and you live in a country with politicians that can and will do anything they want to.

The Epstein Files will be released with redacted names to protect the GOP. Then later on, they'll be released by Dems with all those redacted names exposed. And even then, nothing will happen.
Posted by caliegeaux
Member since Aug 2004
12403 posts
Posted on 11/18/25 at 9:43 am to
because when they say they are working "for you", they mean it, but they're behind you bending you over telling you how you like it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram