Started By
Message

Is Kiffin truly handcuffed at Ole Miss?

Posted on 11/13/25 at 2:35 pm
Posted by Adam4848
LA
Member since Apr 2006
19623 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 2:35 pm
The 2024 roster was their first “all in move” as a collective group. Had an incredible transfer class, the OL and DL was finally stocked, Dart was a veteran SEC QB who’s starting in the NFL…but they still lost Judkins to Ohio State and ended up with 3 loses.

Flash forward this year and Kiffin and Ole Miss are outperforming their expectations….barring a collapse will be hosting a playoff game.

And yet with the backing of Ole Miss and promises to do whatever possible the recruiting classes are averaging about 18-19 in the country which has been proven to fall short actually winning titles even with good to great transfer portal classes.

If Kiffin doesn’t make it past the first round of the playoffs this year is the writing on the wall?
Posted by cajuntiger1010
Member since Jan 2015
13534 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 2:39 pm to
Compared to LSU? Yes.

LSU has a national championship brand and instate talent galore to go with spender boosters
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
74580 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

instate talent
Irrelevant in the NIL and transfer portal era
Posted by LSUminati
Member since Jan 2017
3959 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 2:50 pm to
If Transfer Portal is equal, being as generous as you can to Ole Miss. LSU arguably has better transfer portal potential.

LSU still has the potential to recruit a class 10-15 spots higher than Ole Miss can on a regular basis. Not to mention the money and clout to attract top staff on a regular basis (see Austin Thomas).

It all comes down to what Lane wants from a personal standpoint. It's not that complicated.
Posted by BootyFett69
6969 W High Street
Member since Jan 2021
1796 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

Irrelevant in the NIL and transfer portal era


You don’t think in state kids want to play for the hometown school?
Posted by LSUminati
Member since Jan 2017
3959 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

Irrelevant in the NIL and transfer portal era


it's still very relevant
Posted by clamdip
Rocky Mountain High
Member since Sep 2004
20039 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 2:51 pm to
bullshite. The stud players have always had schools bidding on them. It's just out in the open now. All things equal, most will play for the in-state schools they've dreamed of playing for if pursued.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
35722 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

If Transfer Portal is equal,


Transfer portal hasn’t been equal though. As recent as two years ago BK said he doesn’t buy players. Was that him or was that there was no money? I don’t know the answer to that.

Even so, LSU did spend more this year and they still didn’t really hit on any transfers they needed. O line still sucks and they’re incredibly thin at RB. They got a couple of mid receivers though.
Posted by OleVaught14
Member since Jun 2019
9392 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

The 2024 roster was their first “all in move” as a collective group. Had an incredible transfer class, the OL and DL was finally stocked, Dart was a veteran SEC QB who’s starting in the NFL…but they still lost Judkins to Ohio State and ended up with 3 loses.


If we're being honest, he had a top 2-3 roster in the country last year and shite the bed against horrible Kentucky and Florida teams. He's definitely out-performed expectations this year though.

And we didn't lose Judkins because of money - Kiffin told him to find a new team.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
74580 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

You don’t think in state kids want to play for the hometown school?
Nowhere near as much as they used to. And if they do, the great ones will go there, sit a year on the bench, get upset and transfer for more playing time.

“Playing for the home team” is becoming an antiquated selling point
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
64146 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

quote: instate talent Irrelevant in the NIL and transfer portal era


Instate players are more likely to take less money to stay closer to home. Very relevant
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
87605 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 2:55 pm to
Yes.

Ole Miss and Florida fans telling themselves LSU is out of it for Lane are delusional.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
74580 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

And we didn't lose Judkins because of money - Kiffin told him to find a new team.
Are there really morons that still think he left because of money?

He took almost half of what he was getting at Ole Miss when he went to OSU. Then in the spring he reached back out trying to come back and Kiffin told him no again.
Posted by tigerbait2010
PNW
Member since May 2006
32629 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 2:56 pm to
Look at Oregon, Ohio State, Alabama, Georgia…their rosters are built on high school evaluations and making sure the guys stay and development. Only after do you hit the portal to patch things up.

LSU is less about the “hits and misses” in the portal and needs to revamp the culture and talent development. Kelly’s first two classes were absolutely worthless for us and it showed having almost zero depth prior to the portal patching things up.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
74580 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Yes. Ole Miss and Florida fans telling themselves LSU is out of it for Lane are delusional.
Better tell your AD to call Sexton about him then because outside of one of your boosters, nobody has called his office regarding Kiffin since Woodward did 2 days before the A&M game
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
35722 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Look at Oregon, Ohio State, Alabama, Georgia…their rosters are built on high school evaluations and making sure the guys stay and development. Only after do you hit the portal to patch things up.


Correct, build through high school, supplement through the portal.
Posted by IM_4_LSU
Savannah, GA
Member since Mar 2014
11619 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

bullshite. The stud players have always had schools bidding on them


It was not EVERY player. It is a completely different animal than what it used to be. The numbers are also not even remotely similar fyi.
Posted by The Eric
Member since Sep 2008
23888 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:02 pm to
Pipeline recruiting will always be a thing. It may not be like pre NIL but it will still exist.

Not often that Mississippi has good talent.
This post was edited on 11/13/25 at 3:03 pm
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
87605 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:02 pm to
Posted by IM_4_LSU
Savannah, GA
Member since Mar 2014
11619 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Nowhere near as much as they used to. And if they do, the great ones will go there, sit a year on the bench, get upset and transfer for more playing time.

“Playing for the home team” is becoming an antiquated selling point


Two things can be true. The NIL era has made it more likely a player leaves home even in Louisiana. While it also true that in-state players in Louisiana still want to play for LSU. They take smaller deals/discounts.

Is it the advantage it was 10 years ago? No but its still relevant. Its very ignorant to assume otherwise.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram