Started By
Message

What is Kelly hiding?

Posted on 11/11/25 at 3:15 pm
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
36202 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 3:15 pm
He sends an email to wanting to start negotiations on a lump sum trying to start the 7 day timer. He negotiates in bad faith to get past the “cure period” then exits negotiations and sues.


Bad form.


What is he hiding that he chose to try to run out the clock?
Posted by DrEdgeLSU
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2006
8566 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

He sends an email to wanting to start negotiations on a lump sum trying to start the 7 day timer. He negotiates in bad faith to get past the “cure period” then exits negotiations and sues.


Bad form.


What is he hiding that he chose to try to run out the clock?


I've seen a lot of weird interpretations of this situation, but this one is pretty out there.
Posted by Tboy13
Member since Oct 2015
146 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 3:19 pm to
Poor clock management IMO
Posted by sabanisarustedspoke
Member since Jan 2007
5534 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 3:19 pm to
He knows that no company in its right mind is gonna have $54million on the line without paying a chainsmoking ex-cop to follow said subject around for a few grand/yr or perhaps a recovery percentage in hopes of catching said coach "slipping". We are no different than any other company. I assume..
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
8791 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 3:20 pm to


The contract calls for a firing with cause to be given to Kelly and then he would have 7 days to cure it.

Nothing he did would affect that. It was LSU's responsibility to notify him of cause.

And, if they were firing him for cause, there would be no negotiations as the buyout would be null and void.

Posted by RanchoLaPuerto
Jena
Member since Aug 2023
1731 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 3:20 pm to
A smart legal move would be:

—Reinstate
—Send notice
—Wait out cure period
—Fire him again
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
36202 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

The contract calls for a firing with cause to be given to Kelly and then he would have 7 days to cure it. Nothing he did would affect that. It was LSU's responsibility to notify him of cause.


His email day 1 was to have a paper trail for timing.

He wanted the clock to start


quote:

And, if they were firing him for cause, there would be no negotiations as the buyout would be null and void.



Just because they CAN fire him for cause may not be the best for both parties. LSU doesn’t want its dirty laundry in public either and doesn’t want the long litigation that would follow with bad PR hits.


Kelly knows this hence him trying to start the clock with an email saying he had been informed of being fired and wanted to start negotiations all the while just waiting for the 7 day window to end.
Posted by TigerGrad03
Member since Dec 2024
521 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 3:25 pm to
I think he had conversations with Woodward about negotiating the buy out and then Woodward got fired.

The attorneys on the BOS decided to throw out a lowball offer. Kelly refused and threw out a higher anchor. LSU countered with $30M and here we are.

Kelly feels he has leverage, LSU is trying to gain leverage by threatening "for cause". Kelly thinks they are bluffing and is calling. We'll find out in the next couple weeks if LSU was or not.

Moscona made a comment on the Locked on Podcast today about if Kelly were to win, the money would have to be appropriated by the state legislature since the suit is against the state. He said there is apparently $300M of awards owed by the state to people that are just hung up becasue the state hasn't or can't budget them in. This could be another leverage point from LSU. If Kelly doesn't take a lower buy out amount they will let it go to court, Kelly will probably win, and then the state will take it's sweet time appropriating the funds.

In the end, I think this still gets settled out of court. We are just in the middle of the penis measuring part of negotiations. LSU doesn't want to go to court and neither does Kelly.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
22468 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 3:25 pm to
He isn't hiding anything. He was not doing his job well, got himself fired, pretended he was part of the problem so there would be negotiations, is nonresponsive to negotiations and sues for the full amount the moment he thinks he can.

I don't think that timer means what they think it means though, this will get interesting. I'm hoping there is more documentation than Kelly's team thinks there is.
Posted by K Baw
W Monroe
Member since Jun 2019
527 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 3:26 pm to
He should settle for 25 and call it a victory just like he has done all year.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
87513 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

I don't think that timer means what they think it means though,


funny thing about suing is once you get it in front of a judge you never know what might happen, it could blow up in his face, or LSU's
Posted by BearCrocs
Member since Aug 2013
7840 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 3:27 pm to
Pussy is undefeated.
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22781 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

7 day timer


What 7 day timer?

quote:

to run out the clock


What clock?

LSU is not required to fire him with cause after the 7 day notice and cure period lapses. They simply cannot do it before then. You're suggestion makes zero sense in this context.
Posted by DrEdgeLSU
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2006
8566 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

His email day 1 was to have a paper trail for timing.

He wanted the clock to start


What on earth are you talking about?

It's not on the employee to "start a clock."

That's not how any of this works...at all.
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
41708 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 3:33 pm to
Man, you post some stupid stuff.
Posted by Amused Lurker
Atlanta
Member since Dec 2015
2104 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 3:36 pm to
Why does the Rant think Kelly is sitting in his home scheming this stuff? His agents and their lawyers are the ones filing the lawsuits, writing the letters, etc. It’s Trace Armstrong & Co. it’s laughable to see the Rant lose its mind about visualizing BK conspiring.
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
8791 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 5:09 pm to
The 7 day window starts “IF” he was fired for cause, not just if he was fired.

Thats where your entire theory collapses
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
36202 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

The 7 day window starts “IF” he was fired for cause, not just if he was fired. Thats where your entire theory collapses


And LSU maintains he has not been formally fired yet so cause is on the table.

He is trying to backdate the official termination date so that LSU doesn’t have the negotiation chip of a “cause” firing
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
49763 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 5:20 pm to
It would be the most Louisiana thing ever for Woodward to “fire” Kelly only for him not to be officially fired until 2+ weeks later.
Posted by Russianblue
Member since Nov 2007
1525 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

It would be the most Louisiana thing ever for Woodward to “fire” Kelly only for him not to be officially fired until 2+ weeks later.


NO kidding. So embarrassing.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram