- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Kelly would have settled for $43 Million, LSU rejected...
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:19 pm
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:19 pm
LSU should have taken that when they could. That would at least have relieved them $10M...
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 1:23 pm
10
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:20 pm to jasonbr1975
Have we learned exactly what it is that LSU is claiming against Kelly?
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:20 pm to jasonbr1975
They’ll settle for like 38m
This isn’t a big deal like this board thinks. Just two parties meeting in the middle
This isn’t a big deal like this board thinks. Just two parties meeting in the middle
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:20 pm to jasonbr1975
What incentive would LSU have to pay up-front $43m versus the contracted $800k/mo til 2031?
None.
That’s why the final settlement will be about $35m
A lot of our fans on this board don’t understand present value. LSU will only pay less than the PV. Anything equal or greater than the PV LSU will simply continue paying the $800k/mo.
None.
That’s why the final settlement will be about $35m
A lot of our fans on this board don’t understand present value. LSU will only pay less than the PV. Anything equal or greater than the PV LSU will simply continue paying the $800k/mo.
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:20 pm to jasonbr1975
They are going to settle. If you are Kelly you have to sue for leverage in negotiations. They will come to a number.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:21 pm to jasonbr1975
LSU doesn't have that laying around to give out. That's why they offered the $30m in two installments.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:21 pm to jasonbr1975
I'm so tired of lsu fans being a bunch of pussies over money that is not even ours or affecting us. Brian Kelly is a fricking a-hole that was stealing his pay check, checked the frick out, was obviously a fricking alcoholic, acted like an a-hole in press conferences, hardly ever had his team prepared accordingly nor actually coached jack fricking shite in games. frick him. If there's shite to rub on his face, rub it all on his fricking face in court. frick his coaching reputation forever.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:22 pm to cajuntiger1010
quote:
This isn’t a big deal like this board thinks. Just two parties meeting in the middle
While making LSU look like a bunch of clowns to the nation and potential future coaching hires.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:23 pm to SG_Geaux
quote:
While making LSU look like a bunch of clowns to the nation and potential future coaching hires.
This is actually completely normal precedent.
this board is just sky screaming from recent trauma
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:25 pm to jasonbr1975
No offense but I find it amazing the percentage of grown adults that don’t understand $53 million today is not the same value as $53 million paid monthly for the next 6 years. There’s probably a million things I should know that I don’t but this one is pretty simple.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:25 pm to jasonbr1975
Wrong. $43MM upfront and no offset isn’t as good as the current payout over the next 5 years. There’s a time value of money, plus if BK goes to work elsewhere every dollar he earns is $1 less to pay him.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:26 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
Have we learned exactly what it is that LSU is claiming against Kelly?
Sauces say it’s not the affair that’s doing him in. It’s the fact that he’s a very selfish lover. That’s where they’re going to get him.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:27 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
Wrong. $43MM upfront and no offset isn’t as good as the current payout over the next 5 years.
You’ve got this backwards
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:32 pm to RB10
Moscona lol
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:34 pm to JPLSU1981
quote:
What incentive would LSU have to pay up-front $43m versus the contracted $800k/mo til 2031?
None.
That’s why the final settlement will be about $35m
A lot of our fans on this board don’t understand present value. LSU will only pay less than the PV. Anything equal or greater than the PV LSU will simply continue paying the $800k/mo.
I posted this in another thread, but approximate PV of the buyout at various annualized rates of return:
4%: $47.2 million
6%: $44.5 million
8%: $42.4 million
10%: $40.1 million
12%: $38.3 million
You could argue that $43m is a lot closer to PV than $35m. Of course there’s also value associated with the elimination of offsets/duty to mitigate.
Your point about the PV isn’t wrong though.. contrary to popular belief, this is basically a zero-sum game. There aren’t really any win/win settlements here.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:35 pm to jasonbr1975
$43 - tmv and no offset clause they were right to say no
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:35 pm to covtgr
quote:
No offense but I find it amazing the percentage of grown adults that don’t understand $53 million today is not the same value as $53 million paid monthly for the next 6 years. There’s probably a million things I should know that I don’t but this one is pretty simple.
You have to explain it to them using the example of taking the lower lump sum amount if they win the lottery. They speak power ball language.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:36 pm to Gings5
quote:Hookers?
Sauces say it’s not the affair that’s doing him in. It’s the fact that he’s a very selfish lover. That’s where they’re going to get him.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:38 pm to SG_Geaux
quote:
While making LSU look like a bunch of clowns to the nation
Lot of motivation to “pile on”
quote:
and potential future coaching hires.
Not in the least
Posted on 11/11/25 at 1:38 pm to cajuntiger1010
quote:How often do fired coaches have to sue their former school for their buyout? This feels unprecedented.
This isn’t a big deal like this board thinks. Just two parties meeting in the middle
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News