- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Did the Judge just Win this For Letitia James? Some people think so.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:06 pm
quote:
On Friday, Judge Jamar Walker granted Letitia James’ request to consolidate her motion with Comey’s similar motion so the Clinton judge can decide whether Lindsey Halligan will be disqualified in both cases.
The fix is in.
“This judge, Jamar Walker, has decided that he is going to grant a request by James’ attorneys to have her motion essentially to disqualify Lindsey Halligan on the grounds that she was not lawfully appointed consolidated with that of Jim Comey, who also brought a similar motion,” MSNBC reported.
Is The FIX In?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 
18
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:12 pm to Timeoday
Makes it easy for SCOTUS to reverse the 2 decisions at the same time.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:12 pm to Timeoday
This is up there with I can’t be racist because I’m black.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:15 pm to Timeoday
What is the theory behind this showing the fix is in, exactly?
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
Oh hey its the groomer, showing up to ruin another thread.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:18 pm to YumYum Sauce
quote:
Oh hey its the groomer,
Wut in tarnation?
quote:
showing up to ruin another thread.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:21 pm to Timeoday
If Halligan is disqualified that simply means next man/woman up. That doesn't dismiss the indictment.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
It is simply stated in the link. Regardless, eventually Letitia James and James Comey will be prosecuted for their criminal activity.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:23 pm to Timeoday
Judges have declined to dismiss indictments for other "improper" appointees (see Habba decisions).
They may be able to get her barred from trying the the cases, but they won't be dismissed.
They may be able to get her barred from trying the the cases, but they won't be dismissed.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:24 pm to udtiger
I cannot see how she will not be found guilty.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:29 pm to TDTOM
quote:
I cannot see how she will not be found guilty.
It will go something like this....
They did not charge schiff for the same thing so its targeting me. The judge will agree and dismiss.
Then schiff will be charged and he will say, they dismissed her for the same thing, mine should be dismissed, and the judge will agree.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:31 pm to Timeoday
I heard if you need these kinds of motions granted then you have to go before Aileen Cannon 
This post was edited on 10/24/25 at 2:32 pm
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:32 pm to Timeoday
quote:
It is simply stated in the link
Not really. It's some Gateway Pundit bullshite, which is why I asked.
quote:
eventually Letitia James and James Comey will be prosecuted for their criminal activity.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:32 pm to Timeoday
Not a big deal. If judge is going to approve or deny on same issue, wants to be done with it at once.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:35 pm to prplhze2000
quote:
Not a big deal. If judge is going to approve or deny on same issue, wants to be done with it at once.
Correct.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:35 pm to Timeoday
quote:
disqualify Lindsey Halligan on the grounds that she was not lawfully appointed
Seems the last thing they should want is to have Halligan removed from the case. They should be seeking an Order that Halligan must try the case. That gives the defendants the absolute best chance of winning.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:36 pm to Timeoday
I could be wrong, but there seems to be an enormous difference in the potential CONSEQUENCES of granting these motions.
If the disqualification is granted in the Comey case, that will end it. A defective indictment doesn't stop the statute of limitations from running. The only charges against Comey (so far) occurred more than 5 years ago.
That's not true with James. Even if Halligan isn't the lawful US Attorney for EDVA, another prosecutor can start fresh against James.
If the disqualification is granted in the Comey case, that will end it. A defective indictment doesn't stop the statute of limitations from running. The only charges against Comey (so far) occurred more than 5 years ago.
That's not true with James. Even if Halligan isn't the lawful US Attorney for EDVA, another prosecutor can start fresh against James.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:39 pm to boosiebadazz
Which is why I am so confused. You would think they would want to try this in front of Cannon to erase any doubt among so many others.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:39 pm to Timeoday
No chance
She's not getting away with this. This fish eyed fool is going down.
She's not getting away with this. This fish eyed fool is going down.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 2:40 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
That's not true with James. Even if Halligan isn't the lawful US Attorney for EDVA, another prosecutor can start fresh against James.
I'm pretty sure you're right. I haven't looked at the dates but I think she's well within the SOL.
It would be egg on the face of the admin if they bumbled this easy indictment for Comey, though. Just typical Trump admin chaos.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News