Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

In the NIL era, coaching shouldn't be a priority for head coaches

Posted on 10/21/25 at 9:56 am
Posted by gizmoflak
Member since May 2007
11829 posts
Posted on 10/21/25 at 9:56 am
As a HC, these aspects are all more important than actually coaching:

Recruiting
Raising money / keeping boosters happy
Luring transfers
Managing a roster
Hiring coordinators and staff
Attending PR events and press interviews


Perhaps in-game situational decisions is the most important coaching function. But otherwise, all of the X's and O's can (and should) be delegated to coordinators. A HC at a big-time program perhaps has too much on their plate to be heavily involved in the nitty gritty of coaching and should instead be focused on GM-esque tasks.
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
85763 posts
Posted on 10/21/25 at 9:57 am to
quote:

coaching shouldn't be a priority


Cristobal heard you loud and clear
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
38368 posts
Posted on 10/21/25 at 9:58 am to
You've got it backwards.

Coaching becomes way more important. The recruiter/CEO head coach is dead.

All of these tasks are getting offloaded to general managers
Posted by OKBoomerSooner
Member since Dec 2019
4735 posts
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:00 am to
Counterpoint—many programs have created a “general manager” role to delegate the NIL-specific duties.

I think it’s more important than ever for a head coach to know what he’s good at and surround himself with people that complement his strengths and mitigate his weaknesses. If he’s great at working boosters and recruiting, awesome, that’s a big deal in NIL. Get some awesome Xs and Os guys for coordinators and stay out of their way. If he’s a sharp Xs and Os guy himself, cool, make sure the GM is good at working boosters and roster management. The head coach has to do all these things, but he doesn’t do any of them alone. So delegate the weaker areas more and stick to the stronger areas.
Posted by JimTiger72
Member since Jun 2023
15397 posts
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:03 am to
You don’t think coaching matters in the NFL?

CFB has become more like the NFL where you pay for talent.

What you’re describing sounds more like what Texas Tech/LSU/Miami are doing just trying to buy success
This post was edited on 10/21/25 at 10:04 am
Posted by TheePalmetto
Member since Aug 2025
1012 posts
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:09 am to
You’re 100% right btw. They spend more time fundraising for recruiting and less time directly recruiting guys than before. The GMs handle the payments from collectives and all but anyone telling you the recruiter/ceo is gone/less important is kidding themselves. Can it work everywhere? No. But is it what national champions use? Absolutely. Look at recent National Champions for proof.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
35725 posts
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:10 am to
quote:

You've got it backwards.

Coaching becomes way more important. The recruiter/CEO head coach is dead.


100%, the talent gap is closer than ever making coaching more important. This season is a perfect example of that. Clemson, Penn State, LSU, Texas. All supposed to have “elite” rosters and lose on gameday
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
12416 posts
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:11 am to
Is that you Brian? That resembles what we have now. How’s it working out?
Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
69589 posts
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:16 am to
But at some point do you really need continued coaching?
Posted by real turf fan
East Tennessee
Member since Dec 2016
11005 posts
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:17 am to
Books are going to be written and TV series inspired by the antics of paying immature teenagers big money.
It's what no-longer-amateur sports have become. We are just along for the ride.
Posted by JimTiger72
Member since Jun 2023
15397 posts
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:19 am to
Absolutely. While these kids are getting paid like pros, they are still 18-19 year olds. They are talented but they don’t know everything

That is true for most young NFL players too.

Do NFL vets really need continued coaching? Not really, but that’s not happening with CFB
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
89355 posts
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:23 am to
quote:

In the NIL era, coaching shouldn't be a priority for head coaches. As a HC, these aspects are all more important than actually coaching:

Recruiting


how in the hell is it possible to be this wrong? Like, couldn't possibly be more wrong.

Back in the day I'd agree with you. since people couldn't just transfer willy nilly at the drop of a hat, you could assemble top talent, develop them, and most years you'd have a lights out roster. Bama and UGA did it for years. But now? No. For starters, a guy can leave after his freshman year if he feels like it, so simply recruiting 5* HS talent every year doesn't really mean what it used to. Furthermore since whichever school has the deepest pockets can just buy who they want, there is a lot more talent spread out amongst the country. Which means if the talent gap is a lot more evened out, you need a coaching advantage.


Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
39480 posts
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:24 am to
I think you're way off.

You raise money and keep boosters happy by winning. You win by acquiring talent and coaching them up.

"Recruiting" success is graded by where you rank on the major publications. I'd go further and say that now more than ever, scouting is paramount. You can't pay every signee like a top 25 5 star player. So you have to be really good at spotting the kids that are underrated by the services because they don't cost as much.

Two of Alabama's best freshmen players this year were both 3 stars, Lotzier Brooks and London Simmons. There was minimal competition for their services. The eventual highest rated signee was flipped from SMU when he was rated as a low 4 star. You need to be able to identify talent early and not rely on the websites to do it
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
35725 posts
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Books are going to be written and TV series inspired by the antics of paying immature teenagers big money. It's what no-longer-amateur sports have become. We are just along for the ride.


These threads always reveal the socialists parroting around as republicans
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
463718 posts
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:25 am to
quote:

You've got it backwards.

Coaching becomes way more important. The recruiter/CEO head coach is dead.

All of these tasks are getting offloaded to general managers

Zacktly
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
463718 posts
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:29 am to
quote:

This season is a perfect example of that. Clemson, Penn State, LSU, Texas. All supposed to have “elite” rosters and lose on gameday


Well Texas doesn't belong on that list. Sark runs that offense and is involved D2D. He's not a CEO/recruiter. He can actually perform coaching and scheming duties at a high level.

Arch just isn't that good in 2025.

James Franklin used to, but I'm not sure if he's more of a CEO now.

Clemson and LSU are true CEO situations. The shitty part about LSU's situation is our offense is Kelly's offense, but he's not involved in the D2D stuff and just shits on his coordinators for not running it well. He's been doing that since his ND tenure.
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
7206 posts
Posted on 10/21/25 at 3:08 pm to
I think you need an offensive coach who can call plays. Someone who will keep up with the times and not be too stubborn to adapt. Having your head coach call plays insulates you from issues when you lose an OC.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram