- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
In the NIL era, coaching shouldn't be a priority for head coaches
Posted on 10/21/25 at 9:56 am
Posted on 10/21/25 at 9:56 am
As a HC, these aspects are all more important than actually coaching:
Recruiting
Raising money / keeping boosters happy
Luring transfers
Managing a roster
Hiring coordinators and staff
Attending PR events and press interviews
Perhaps in-game situational decisions is the most important coaching function. But otherwise, all of the X's and O's can (and should) be delegated to coordinators. A HC at a big-time program perhaps has too much on their plate to be heavily involved in the nitty gritty of coaching and should instead be focused on GM-esque tasks.
Recruiting
Raising money / keeping boosters happy
Luring transfers
Managing a roster
Hiring coordinators and staff
Attending PR events and press interviews
Perhaps in-game situational decisions is the most important coaching function. But otherwise, all of the X's and O's can (and should) be delegated to coordinators. A HC at a big-time program perhaps has too much on their plate to be heavily involved in the nitty gritty of coaching and should instead be focused on GM-esque tasks.
Posted on 10/21/25 at 9:57 am to gizmoflak
quote:
coaching shouldn't be a priority
Cristobal heard you loud and clear
Posted on 10/21/25 at 9:58 am to gizmoflak
You've got it backwards.
Coaching becomes way more important. The recruiter/CEO head coach is dead.
All of these tasks are getting offloaded to general managers
Coaching becomes way more important. The recruiter/CEO head coach is dead.
All of these tasks are getting offloaded to general managers
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:00 am to gizmoflak
Counterpoint—many programs have created a “general manager” role to delegate the NIL-specific duties.
I think it’s more important than ever for a head coach to know what he’s good at and surround himself with people that complement his strengths and mitigate his weaknesses. If he’s great at working boosters and recruiting, awesome, that’s a big deal in NIL. Get some awesome Xs and Os guys for coordinators and stay out of their way. If he’s a sharp Xs and Os guy himself, cool, make sure the GM is good at working boosters and roster management. The head coach has to do all these things, but he doesn’t do any of them alone. So delegate the weaker areas more and stick to the stronger areas.
I think it’s more important than ever for a head coach to know what he’s good at and surround himself with people that complement his strengths and mitigate his weaknesses. If he’s great at working boosters and recruiting, awesome, that’s a big deal in NIL. Get some awesome Xs and Os guys for coordinators and stay out of their way. If he’s a sharp Xs and Os guy himself, cool, make sure the GM is good at working boosters and roster management. The head coach has to do all these things, but he doesn’t do any of them alone. So delegate the weaker areas more and stick to the stronger areas.
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:03 am to gizmoflak
You don’t think coaching matters in the NFL?
CFB has become more like the NFL where you pay for talent.
What you’re describing sounds more like what Texas Tech/LSU/Miami are doing just trying to buy success
CFB has become more like the NFL where you pay for talent.
What you’re describing sounds more like what Texas Tech/LSU/Miami are doing just trying to buy success
This post was edited on 10/21/25 at 10:04 am
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:09 am to gizmoflak
You’re 100% right btw. They spend more time fundraising for recruiting and less time directly recruiting guys than before. The GMs handle the payments from collectives and all but anyone telling you the recruiter/ceo is gone/less important is kidding themselves. Can it work everywhere? No. But is it what national champions use? Absolutely. Look at recent National Champions for proof.
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:10 am to usc6158
quote:
You've got it backwards.
Coaching becomes way more important. The recruiter/CEO head coach is dead.
100%, the talent gap is closer than ever making coaching more important. This season is a perfect example of that. Clemson, Penn State, LSU, Texas. All supposed to have “elite” rosters and lose on gameday
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:11 am to gizmoflak
Is that you Brian? That resembles what we have now. How’s it working out?
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:16 am to JimTiger72
But at some point do you really need continued coaching?
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:17 am to SloaneRanger
Books are going to be written and TV series inspired by the antics of paying immature teenagers big money.
It's what no-longer-amateur sports have become. We are just along for the ride.
It's what no-longer-amateur sports have become. We are just along for the ride.
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:19 am to lsucoonass
Absolutely. While these kids are getting paid like pros, they are still 18-19 year olds. They are talented but they don’t know everything
That is true for most young NFL players too.
Do NFL vets really need continued coaching? Not really, but that’s not happening with CFB
That is true for most young NFL players too.
Do NFL vets really need continued coaching? Not really, but that’s not happening with CFB
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:23 am to gizmoflak
quote:
In the NIL era, coaching shouldn't be a priority for head coaches. As a HC, these aspects are all more important than actually coaching:
Recruiting
how in the hell is it possible to be this wrong? Like, couldn't possibly be more wrong.
Back in the day I'd agree with you. since people couldn't just transfer willy nilly at the drop of a hat, you could assemble top talent, develop them, and most years you'd have a lights out roster. Bama and UGA did it for years. But now? No. For starters, a guy can leave after his freshman year if he feels like it, so simply recruiting 5* HS talent every year doesn't really mean what it used to. Furthermore since whichever school has the deepest pockets can just buy who they want, there is a lot more talent spread out amongst the country. Which means if the talent gap is a lot more evened out, you need a coaching advantage.
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:24 am to gizmoflak
I think you're way off.
You raise money and keep boosters happy by winning. You win by acquiring talent and coaching them up.
"Recruiting" success is graded by where you rank on the major publications. I'd go further and say that now more than ever, scouting is paramount. You can't pay every signee like a top 25 5 star player. So you have to be really good at spotting the kids that are underrated by the services because they don't cost as much.
Two of Alabama's best freshmen players this year were both 3 stars, Lotzier Brooks and London Simmons. There was minimal competition for their services. The eventual highest rated signee was flipped from SMU when he was rated as a low 4 star. You need to be able to identify talent early and not rely on the websites to do it
You raise money and keep boosters happy by winning. You win by acquiring talent and coaching them up.
"Recruiting" success is graded by where you rank on the major publications. I'd go further and say that now more than ever, scouting is paramount. You can't pay every signee like a top 25 5 star player. So you have to be really good at spotting the kids that are underrated by the services because they don't cost as much.
Two of Alabama's best freshmen players this year were both 3 stars, Lotzier Brooks and London Simmons. There was minimal competition for their services. The eventual highest rated signee was flipped from SMU when he was rated as a low 4 star. You need to be able to identify talent early and not rely on the websites to do it
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:25 am to real turf fan
quote:
Books are going to be written and TV series inspired by the antics of paying immature teenagers big money. It's what no-longer-amateur sports have become. We are just along for the ride.
These threads always reveal the socialists parroting around as republicans
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:25 am to usc6158
quote:
You've got it backwards.
Coaching becomes way more important. The recruiter/CEO head coach is dead.
All of these tasks are getting offloaded to general managers
Zacktly
Posted on 10/21/25 at 10:29 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
This season is a perfect example of that. Clemson, Penn State, LSU, Texas. All supposed to have “elite” rosters and lose on gameday
Well Texas doesn't belong on that list. Sark runs that offense and is involved D2D. He's not a CEO/recruiter. He can actually perform coaching and scheming duties at a high level.
Arch just isn't that good in 2025.
James Franklin used to, but I'm not sure if he's more of a CEO now.
Clemson and LSU are true CEO situations. The shitty part about LSU's situation is our offense is Kelly's offense, but he's not involved in the D2D stuff and just shits on his coordinators for not running it well. He's been doing that since his ND tenure.
Posted on 10/21/25 at 3:08 pm to gizmoflak
I think you need an offensive coach who can call plays. Someone who will keep up with the times and not be too stubborn to adapt. Having your head coach call plays insulates you from issues when you lose an OC.
Popular
Back to top
9









