Started By
Message

Help me understand the phrase ‘Last but not least’

Posted on 10/12/25 at 6:36 pm
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
1616 posts
Posted on 10/12/25 at 6:36 pm
I get that it is trying to say that an entry in a list isn’t implied to be the least just because it is last.

However, does that mean another entry somewhere in the list is least? Or something not even on the list is least?

People say ‘last but not least’ all the time, but I wonder if it is more a reflex than a conscious choice.
Posted by LsuTool
Member since Oct 2009
35731 posts
Posted on 10/12/25 at 6:37 pm to
It’s not that deep
Posted by IT_Dawg
Georgia
Member since Oct 2012
26161 posts
Posted on 10/12/25 at 6:40 pm to
Pretty simple, imagine rambling off something on a list….you simply want the people listening to realize that just because you are mentioning them last, doesn’t mean they are less important/valuable/etc than the rest
Posted by Happygilmore
Happy Place
Member since Mar 2009
1827 posts
Posted on 10/12/25 at 6:42 pm to
He should date that chick that takes herself serious
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
1616 posts
Posted on 10/12/25 at 6:42 pm to
But doesn’t the wording imply that something is least?
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
66924 posts
Posted on 10/12/25 at 6:45 pm to
Auburn is a perfect example of "last. but not least" for 2025.

Thanks,
refs
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
1616 posts
Posted on 10/12/25 at 6:46 pm to
Auburn is a great example of last and least this year
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
13335 posts
Posted on 10/12/25 at 6:49 pm to
Have an upvote... I like weagle musings.

Furthermore, people should begin their list with "first, but not foremost".
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
24370 posts
Posted on 10/12/25 at 6:50 pm to
One fell swoop.
Posted by MRTigerFan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
6284 posts
Posted on 10/12/25 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

It’s not that deep

Posted by Nuts
Michigan
Member since Oct 2011
1129 posts
Posted on 10/12/25 at 7:06 pm to
You're thinking about it too much. Don't hurt yourself.
Posted by Pizza Dan
Member since Apr 2023
643 posts
Posted on 10/12/25 at 7:12 pm to
It means everything he said was important. Also lets you know he’s finally almost finished rambling. Didn’t everyone have a professor like this?
Posted by Jebadeb
Member since Oct 2017
5646 posts
Posted on 10/12/25 at 7:12 pm to
It implies there is a least. Especially occurs when listing or introducing multiple people.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
73109 posts
Posted on 10/12/25 at 7:53 pm to
Last point I'm making but it's not the least important point.
Posted by pussywillows
Member since Dec 2009
6427 posts
Posted on 10/12/25 at 10:13 pm to
you're certainly no jack handey...
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
194193 posts
Posted on 10/12/25 at 10:16 pm to
it originates in biblical principle
Posted by RolltidePA
North Carolina
Member since Dec 2010
4991 posts
Posted on 10/12/25 at 10:33 pm to
It’s inferring that you are not using a ranked or ordered list. None of the things are more important than the other.

It’s not a phrase typically used regarding competition.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
37335 posts
Posted on 10/12/25 at 11:06 pm to
Don’t overthink it. It’s just a consolation for the last thing mentioned.
Posted by windmill
Prairieville, La
Member since Dec 2005
7678 posts
Posted on 10/12/25 at 11:10 pm to
But doesn’t the wording imply that something is least?"

No, it does not. You're workin' too hard. PERIOD.
Posted by Fe_Mike
Member since Jul 2015
3693 posts
Posted on 10/13/25 at 6:39 am to
quote:

However, does that mean another entry somewhere in the list is least? Or something not even on the list is least?


Yes, yes it does mean that.

Why is that a problem?

It masks who or what is 'least' in the list.

If you list off a hundred names and say "last but not least" all it does it eliminate the last name from being least out of hundred. If you hadn't said that, one might assume the last person is indeed least. But since you had said that, nobody can possibly guess who is least, therefore nobody listed is under suspicion of being least.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram