- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Lonesome Dove Saga - Read in published order or in chronological order?
Posted on 10/1/25 at 11:47 am
Posted on 10/1/25 at 11:47 am
I am considering reading this series but noticed that it was not published in chronological order. For those of you who have read this series, do you have a recommendation?
FWIW here is what ChatGPT had to say:
Published Order (Recommended by many fans):
1. Lonesome Dove
2. Streets of Laredo
3. Dead Man’s Walk
4. Comanche Moon
Why this works:
Lonesome Dove was written first and is the masterpiece that won the Pulitzer. It introduces the world and characters at their peak.
Streets of Laredo follows naturally as a sequel.
The prequels (Dead Man’s Walk, Comanche Moon) flesh out the backstory later, after you already know and care about Gus and Call.
This order preserves the emotional weight and surprise of certain character arcs.
Chronological Order (Storyline timeline):
1. Dead Man’s Walk
2. Comanche Moon
3. Lonesome Dove
4. Streets of Laredo
Why this works:
You follow Gus and Call’s lives in a straight line, from young Rangers to old men.
It feels more like a “saga,” with a continuous arc.
You get their history first, so their choices in Lonesome Dove and Streets of Laredo carry more context.
FWIW here is what ChatGPT had to say:
Published Order (Recommended by many fans):
1. Lonesome Dove
2. Streets of Laredo
3. Dead Man’s Walk
4. Comanche Moon
Why this works:
Lonesome Dove was written first and is the masterpiece that won the Pulitzer. It introduces the world and characters at their peak.
Streets of Laredo follows naturally as a sequel.
The prequels (Dead Man’s Walk, Comanche Moon) flesh out the backstory later, after you already know and care about Gus and Call.
This order preserves the emotional weight and surprise of certain character arcs.
Chronological Order (Storyline timeline):
1. Dead Man’s Walk
2. Comanche Moon
3. Lonesome Dove
4. Streets of Laredo
Why this works:
You follow Gus and Call’s lives in a straight line, from young Rangers to old men.
It feels more like a “saga,” with a continuous arc.
You get their history first, so their choices in Lonesome Dove and Streets of Laredo carry more context.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 2:22 pm to When in Rome
I've only ready Lonesome Dove, and it is fantastic. I didnt read any of the others and dont plan to, because on its own Lonesome Dove is my favorite book ever. I dont want to taint that.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 8:19 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
This is the second time today I’ve seen someone say lonesome dove is their favorite book ever. I guess I will have to read that one next.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 8:59 pm to When in Rome
Great series.
All well worth reading.
Read in the order of the story line which is not the order in which they were published.
All well worth reading.
Read in the order of the story line which is not the order in which they were published.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 9:47 pm to When in Rome
Great question that I went back and forth on.
Ended up reading:
1. Lonesome Dove
2. Dead Man’s Walk
3. Comanche Moon
Have not read yet:
Streets of Laredo
Ended up reading:
1. Lonesome Dove
2. Dead Man’s Walk
3. Comanche Moon
Have not read yet:
Streets of Laredo
Posted on 10/2/25 at 12:23 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:What if it enriches the story for you?
on its own Lonesome Dove is my favorite book ever. I dont want to taint that.
Posted on 10/2/25 at 7:32 pm to When in Rome
I read Lonesome Dove first. Then the rest in chronological order.
I would recommend that way.
I would recommend that way.
Posted on 10/3/25 at 10:03 am to When in Rome
quote:
1. Lonesome Dove
2. Streets of Laredo
3. Dead Man’s Walk
4. Comanche Moon
This is what I would do. Lonesome Dove is a masterpiece.
Posted on 10/3/25 at 2:51 pm to When in Rome
I would suggest reading Lonesome Dove first. The others are good books, Lonesome Dove is a masterpiece. You should experience it with a fresh palette.
Posted on 10/4/25 at 5:49 am to Nodust
quote:
I read Lonesome Dove first. Then the rest in chronological order.
I would recommend that way
Agree 100%. And also agree LD is best American novel- only book i ever read that i was very sad it had to end
Posted on 10/4/25 at 4:42 pm to When in Rome
Lonesome Dove
Dead Man’s Walk
Comanche Moon
Read SoL if you are really bored. It’s by far the worst.
Read Shogun, Winds of War or Musashi instead of SoL.
Posted on 10/5/25 at 6:52 am to Tigertown in ATL
It’s been a long time since I’ve read any of these except Lonesome Dove. But I would revise my prior comment to agree with you on your proposed order and criticism of Streets of Laredo now that you have refreshed my recollection. I forgot how disappointed I was in that book.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:01 am to Tigertown in ATL
quote:
Lonesome Dove
Dead Man’s Walk
Comanche Moon
Read SoL if you are really bored. It’s by far the worst.
This exactly.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 11:07 am to When in Rome
I only read LD based off the amazingly high praise from this forum.
It is a little slow at first but after you get into it the book is one that is so difficult to put down.
It is also my favorite book ever. I have 3 friends I finally convinced to read it and we all still talk about how great it is. There is no other book like it, including the others in the saga.
I didn’t read SOL because my friend found it disappointing and said not really worth it.
I thought DMW was a bit simplistic, but did provide some LD nostalgia as I read it. It is also much shorter. I would say that if you read this first you may not be as willing to commit to Comanche Moon or LD as they are much longer to read.
Comanche Moon is a great book but I found it to be a little bit repetitive in parts which was unnecessary. I mainly am referring to Indian internal dialogue and communications. It has more of a LD feel than DMW. I waited years to read it bc I heard it was really good and I wanted to savor it a bit.
I would say rankings are this:
LD 6 stars out of 5
CM 4/5
DMW 3.5/5
I am not going to read sol based on my friend’s assessment.
I would 100% read LD first.
It is a little slow at first but after you get into it the book is one that is so difficult to put down.
It is also my favorite book ever. I have 3 friends I finally convinced to read it and we all still talk about how great it is. There is no other book like it, including the others in the saga.
I didn’t read SOL because my friend found it disappointing and said not really worth it.
I thought DMW was a bit simplistic, but did provide some LD nostalgia as I read it. It is also much shorter. I would say that if you read this first you may not be as willing to commit to Comanche Moon or LD as they are much longer to read.
Comanche Moon is a great book but I found it to be a little bit repetitive in parts which was unnecessary. I mainly am referring to Indian internal dialogue and communications. It has more of a LD feel than DMW. I waited years to read it bc I heard it was really good and I wanted to savor it a bit.
I would say rankings are this:
LD 6 stars out of 5
CM 4/5
DMW 3.5/5
I am not going to read sol based on my friend’s assessment.
I would 100% read LD first.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:07 pm to 0jersey
Such great feedback in this thread! Thanks to everyone. I will definitely start with Lonesome Dove.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 5:16 pm to When in Rome
Don't sleep on other McMurtry books, if you haven't read any of them. In particular All My Friends are Going to Be Strangers, Texasville and The Last Picture show. I've read everything he's ever written, and most of it is high quality. But the above are really fantastic.
This post was edited on 10/6/25 at 5:18 pm
Posted on 10/6/25 at 5:18 pm to LSUballs
Good to know!! I will add these to my list!
Posted on 10/8/25 at 10:01 pm to When in Rome
Just to add another vote that Lonesome Dove is the best book I’ve ever read.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 3:59 pm to LSUballs
quote:
In particular All My Friends are Going to Be Strangers, Texasville and The Last Picture show
I know this the book board but I'm gonna 5alk about movies anyway. The Last Picture is regarded as a great movie, (Cybil Sheppard did go full frontal on her 18th birthday), but Texasville is an entirely overlooked gem. Annie Potts is simply hysterical.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 3:16 pm to When in Rome
I've read them all and i recommend reading Lonesome Dove four times instead of the others.
Seriously, McMurtry caught lightning in a bottle with that one. I've read probably seven or eight of his books and they're all pretty mediocre except for LD which is my favorite book of all time.
Seriously, McMurtry caught lightning in a bottle with that one. I've read probably seven or eight of his books and they're all pretty mediocre except for LD which is my favorite book of all time.
Popular
Back to top


9






