George Washington U admin says Charlie Kirk's murder was "fair" since he supported the 2A

Charlie would probably agree that even his death is part of the cost to keep our ability to defend our freedom.

But the left using children is so disingenuous.

They don't care about kids killed in urban areas, or otherwise, they would support Trump sending in the NG to reduce crime.

They don't care about kids dying from drugs, or else they would support closing the border and going after cartels.

They don't care about the kids trafficked to the US by the cartels because of unsecured borders.

They don't care about kids in the womb aborted out of convenience, or else they would admit that even those lives, no matter how small and undeveloped, are still worth saving.

Nope, they only ever seem to care about the kids killed in schools by guns. Pretty convenient how those deaths that they actually do pretend to care about just happen to be the ones easiest to use for their political quest to remove the Second Amendment.

Classic Soy Beard. Underneath that is fat and acne.

quote:

---

Believing in the right to bear arms to prevent tyranny is not some fringe belief. It’s a constitutional right.

---

Yes. But owning slaves was a Constitutional right before it wasn't. And the 2nd was never about protection from our own Executive branch. That was supposed to be the other 2 branches.

I hope everyone believes in the second Amendment, but even if you do or don’t; you don’t deserve to be murdered for that belief. The sick left is justifying their actions is just sick, they are mentally insane, and that’s a fact. They are taking snippets of his comments and spreading false equivalence. Charlie stated that he believes in the second Amendment, even if there are deaths from widespread adoption, and they are using that statement to justify their actions by murdering him.. sick bastards. What Charlie was probably meaning, my speculation, is that to him, having the Second Amendment gives us a chance that the left doesn’t try to kill us all…

quote:

---

And the 2nd was never about protection from our own Executive branch. That was supposed to be the other 2 branches.

---

Oh really now?

(from LINK just from a quick search but I am familiar with all of these quotes from other sources)

"What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Stephens Smith, son-in-law of John Adams, December 20, 1787

"To disarm the people...[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them."
- George Mason, referencing advice given to the British Parliament by Pennsylvania governor Sir William Keith, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adooption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788

"...the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone..."
- James Madison, Federalist No. 46, January 29, 1788

"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
- William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons, November 18, 1783

"The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them."
- Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, 1833

"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair."
- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28

"[I]f circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist."
- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 28, January 10, 1788

"As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms."
- Tench Coxe, Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789

quote:

---

Charlie would probably agree that even his death is part of the cost to keep our ability to defend our freedom. But the left using children is so disingenuous. They don't care about kids killed in urban areas, or otherwise, they would support Trump sending in the NG to reduce crime. They don't care about kids dying from drugs, or else they would support closing the border and going after cartels. They don't care about the kids trafficked to the US by the cartels because of unsecured borders. They don't care about kids in the womb aborted out of convenience, or else they would admit that even those lives, no matter how small and undeveloped, are still worth saving. Nope, they only ever seem to care about the kids killed in schools by guns. Pretty convenient how those deaths that they actually do pretend to care about just happen to be the ones easiest to use for their political quest to remove the Second Amendment.

---

Very well said! Charlie would be proud of how you stated you point!

Murder isn't "fair", dude is a complete tool

quote:

---

Yes. But owning slaves was a Constitutional right before it wasn't. And the 2nd was never about protection from our own Executive branch. That was supposed to be the other 2 branches

---

Huh...I guess the Ukrainian girl deserved to get her neck slashed, because The Constitution gave women the right to sit where ever they wanted on the train.

quote:

---

mmcgrath and froman

---

You people are legit sick and evil.

quote:

---

By that logic rape is fair for those who have … yep.

---

Pretty sure I've seen lots of posters hoping the worst things for the shooter. I don't think the difference in thought is that much.

How ignorant do you have to be to think the the Founders who risked all to have a revolution against an oppressive govt. didn’t intend for the 2nd Amendment to enable citizens to stand up against an oppressive govt?