- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
So why now? Why the left decided to take Kirk out.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:35 am
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:35 am
Let's discuss. Charlie has always been an easy target if someone wanted him dead. I mean he had his security guys around him but honestly it wasn't like the secret service was involved with snipers and high tech stuff. I mean a open mic and college kids doesn't sound like a lock it down occassion.
I will begin I will throw this around I think the left knew that their illegal immigrant vote would definitely take a hit in the 2026 mid terms coming around due to deporation and Trump trying to pass citizenship to vote. No more you don't need ID to vote. They will not have the bodies this election cycle. Seeing what Charlie did in registering young Republicans last election he definitely became a threat and needed to be taken out.
I will begin I will throw this around I think the left knew that their illegal immigrant vote would definitely take a hit in the 2026 mid terms coming around due to deporation and Trump trying to pass citizenship to vote. No more you don't need ID to vote. They will not have the bodies this election cycle. Seeing what Charlie did in registering young Republicans last election he definitely became a threat and needed to be taken out.
This post was edited on 9/11/25 at 6:36 am
23
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:37 am to FLBooGoTigs1
Mental illness is hitting a high.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:38 am to FLBooGoTigs1
Kirk essentially won the election for Trump. He was THE most influential and inspirational leader in MAGA, second only to the aging and problematic Trump.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:39 am to FLBooGoTigs1
My first thought was to take attention off of all the black fatigue that's been stirred up and they somehow see this as less harmful because it involves "gun violence" as something they can counter with. Wild speculation by my part by the way.
Also they'd want to take him out far enough away from mid terms to not have as much of an effect on voting...at least I think that would be the line of thinking.
Also they'd want to take him out far enough away from mid terms to not have as much of an effect on voting...at least I think that would be the line of thinking.
This post was edited on 9/11/25 at 6:49 am
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:40 am to FLBooGoTigs1
They’ve always had motive, they just needed opportunity. Maybe it’s as simple as that as to the timing.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:40 am to FLBooGoTigs1
quote:
Seeing what Charlie did in registering young Republicans last election he definitely became a threat and needed to be taken out.
If it was an organized hit by the left this is the reason. Charlie was reaching FAR too many young people. Those votes are supposed to go to the Dems. He was also a sincerely driven individual. He wasn't going to just ride off into the sunset when he reached a certain level of wealth and fame. A guy that young, intelligent and determined was going to smash the shite out of the left every chance he got.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:41 am to FLBooGoTigs1
That’s the correct question.
He was effective at swaying the vote in their core cauldrons of progressive indoctrination. He was having a much bigger effect than just debating kids….he was moving the needle on the vote counts in swing states and the progressives can’t allow this. My fear is this is bigger than some crazy tranny…it was a move in the board to take out one of the most effective activists on our side.
He was effective at swaying the vote in their core cauldrons of progressive indoctrination. He was having a much bigger effect than just debating kids….he was moving the needle on the vote counts in swing states and the progressives can’t allow this. My fear is this is bigger than some crazy tranny…it was a move in the board to take out one of the most effective activists on our side.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:42 am to FLBooGoTigs1
From a political standpoint (this was an obviously evil and heinous act), there is no way that I can see how anyone on the left would believe that murdering Charlie Kirk (or anyone else in his position) could possibly help in any type of election format. Election results have always been about motivating people to get out and vote - this awful and evil act will lilely motivate more conservatives to get out and vote than anything else that could have happened. This murder was not about anything more than evil terrorists on the left deciding that they hated Charlie Kirk and that they had to kill him.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:43 am to FLBooGoTigs1
quote:
Seeing what Charlie did in registering young Republicans last election he definitely became a threat and needed to be taken out.
But instead, like always, they over stepped and way over corrected with their strategy. Charlie was changing the minds of the open minded kids on these campuses. Now hundreds of thousands of these open minded kids are gonna see that a man was shot for having different political views and that if they wanted to silence him maybe he’s been onto something along. I feel like they just sped up the work Charlie was trying to accomplish faster than he ever could have himself.
Charlie Kirk was one in a million, but they may just created a million more Charlies.
This post was edited on 9/11/25 at 6:46 am
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:45 am to FLBooGoTigs1
Charlie was exposing to conservatives, the appearance and lack of intelligence the Democratic Party is morphing into. He also was exposing how uneducated college going liberals truly are..
This post was edited on 9/11/25 at 7:48 am
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:47 am to FLBooGoTigs1
Someone has been planning this since election night. Not something you decide to do 2 weeks out. This guy was probably cherry picking his location to give him the best chance to shoot Charlie and escape.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:48 am to 615tider
quote:
If it was an organized hit by the left this is the reason
If is not even a question here. This was a professional hit. It was planned and carried out by the the left. No doubt.
Trump's was too but by the grace of god Trump turned his head.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:48 am to FLBooGoTigs1
They took out Charlie because they cannot overcome his ideals.
Thats it, period.
Thats it, period.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:49 am to SquatchDawg
quote:
That’s the correct question.
He was effective at swaying the vote in their core cauldrons of progressive indoctrination. He was having a much bigger effect than just debating kids….he was moving the needle on the vote counts in swing states and the progressives can’t allow this. My fear is this is bigger than some crazy tranny…it was a move in the board to take out one of the most effective activists on our side.
This is the correct answer.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:49 am to RCDfan1950
quote:
Kirk essentially won the election for Trump. He was THE most influential and inspirational leader in MAGA, second only to the aging and problematic Trump.
Kirk's influence was massive but it wasn't near as big as Elon Musk's influence.
I would say
1. Trump
2. Musk
3. Kirk
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:52 am to Stidham8
Musk essentially has navy seals following him around at all times.. Good luck taking him out.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:53 am to NineLineBind
He was the clear successor to MAGA after Trump.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:53 am to FLBooGoTigs1
This is about 2026 and more long-term 2028 and the 2030 census.
TPUSA has been a major catalyst in shifting Zoomer and older Alpha men to the red column. Perhaps the most significant generational figure for young folks since RFK senior.
#Facts
TPUSA has been a major catalyst in shifting Zoomer and older Alpha men to the red column. Perhaps the most significant generational figure for young folks since RFK senior.
#Facts
This post was edited on 9/11/25 at 6:55 am
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:55 am to Zap Rowsdower
quote:
Charlie Kirk was one in a million, but they may just created a million more Charlies
I sure hope you are correct on this. I was wondering who would step up in his place and carry his message but hopefully Charlie created something that each young person touched by him will pass it along.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 6:57 am to FLBooGoTigs1
There is simply no way a rational person could conclude that publicly taking him out would help their cause.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News